On 3/Jul/18 22:29, Gert Doering wrote:
> Since side A does not know that side B is actually a "MC-LAG" (if
> side B does things right) not sure where you expect problems.
>
> A proper MC-LAG is not really that much different from "a LAG across
> a stacked set of switches" or "a LAG across diffe
Timur Maryin writes:
>On 18-Jun-18 20:40, Phil Shafer wrote:
>> "!" and "not" are identical. The "!" is just syntactic sugar that
>> turns "! x " into "not(x)", as you can see in the code:
>Was it always like this?
Yup. SLAX is all about syntactic sugar. Well, mostly, anyway.
There are extensio
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:19:56PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 3/Jul/18 16:45, Doug McIntyre wrote:
>
> > Overall, they do the same general function, allow a pair of switches to
> > port-channel/aggregated-ethernet a connection in a redundant fashion.
> >
> > The main difference with Junipe
On 3/Jul/18 16:45, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> Overall, they do the same general function, allow a pair of switches to
> port-channel/aggregated-ethernet a connection in a redundant fashion.
>
> The main difference with Juniper it is one of a variety of ways to
> solve the same problem, between virt
Please forgive the confusing strayed statement I left in there about "seems
like you might blah blah" I meant to delete that...
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-ns
lot of info here...
https://www.packetmischief.ca/2012/07/20/4-types-of-port-channels-and-when-t
heyre-used/
seems like you might also want to ask the question ...
Here's some info on interop between cisco vpc and juniper mc-lag
https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/other-data-center-subjects/nexu
Hi Scott
Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite recent.
Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route with
fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher chance to
overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset limitat
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:06:14PM +0530, Mehul Gajjar wrote:
> Need to know what is the difference between Cisco VPC and juniper Mc-lag.
Overall, they do the same general function, allow a pair of switches to
port-channel/aggregated-ethernet a connection in a redundant fashion.
The main differen
Need to know what is the difference between Cisco VPC and juniper Mc-lag.
On Tuesday, July 3, 2018, Tomasz Mikołajek wrote:
> Hello. You want to Configure mc-lag between Cisco and Juniper?
>
> W dniu wt., 3.07.2018 o 15:43 Mehul Gajjar
> napisał(a):
>
>> Hello experts,
>>
>> Can someone pls und
Hello. You want to Configure mc-lag between Cisco and Juniper?
W dniu wt., 3.07.2018 o 15:43 Mehul Gajjar napisał(a):
> Hello experts,
>
> Can someone pls understand me how is different between Cisco VPC and
> Juniper Mc-LAG.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers !!!
> Mehul
>
Hello experts,
Can someone pls understand me how is different between Cisco VPC and
Juniper Mc-LAG.
--
Cheers !!!
Mehul
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any issues?
I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in regards to what they
won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet our needs… just
curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented issues with th
Hi Phil,
On 18-Jun-18 20:40, Phil Shafer wrote:
"!" and "not" are identical. The "!" is just syntactic sugar that
turns "! x " into "not(x)", as you can see in the code:
Was it always like this?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.neth
13 matches
Mail list logo
