Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Mark Tinka
On 14/Aug/18 12:22, Gert Doering wrote: > Which is sort of what stuck after our Arista POC: it's like IOS with > lots of useful enhancements, and without the annoying "I refuse to > do things, because I am right and you are wrong" attitude of JunOS. The t-shirt is going to print :-)... Mark.

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > Do they have commit capability? Yes, optional. You either do "conf term" just like on IOS, or you do "conf session" which needs commit. Which is really really nice - if I do troubleshooting, I want a "interface foo / sh

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread adamv0025
> Of Saku Ytti > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 9:31 AM > > Perhaps in future it's all very small (<5 0M) net install image, then DEB/RPM > all packages via local proxy to have functioning install for specific target, with > specific forwarding engines. > Cisco is certainly on the right track wit

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Pavel Lunin
> > > But if I'm honest, I don't put a lot of stock in this. If you remember, > this was Juniper's line back in the day, "One Junos to rule them all". > Well, things obviously took another turn when they introduced the MX and > EX platforms around 2007/2008. > Moreover, as we've discussed a few we

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Tobias Heister
On 14.08.2018 08:34, Mark Tinka wrote: On 14/Aug/18 08:26, Gert Doering wrote: Mailman claims "there isn't yet", but if Jared would add one, I'd subscribe :-) https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/ As would I... +1 -- regards Tobias ___ juni

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Saku Ytti
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 11:38, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > Do they have commit capability? Yes, and it works. In IOS-XR commit doesn't inherently work, because of how it's designed. In JunOS commit inherently works. In IOS-XR BGP team owns commit for BGP config, tunnel team owns commit for GRE,

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Mark Tinka
On 14/Aug/18 10:37, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > Do they have commit capability? https://eos.arista.com/config-sessions-tips/ Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Mark Tinka
On 14/Aug/18 10:30, Saku Ytti wrote: > I know what you mean, but 'code is Cisco-like' may not be read as > positive by every recipient. I think you more accurately mean 'CLI is > like classic IOS'. This... as in, "it's not much to learn". Very different under the hood, obviously, but on top, i

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Saku Ytti [2018-08-14 10:31]: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 09:35, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > The Arista code is so Cisco-like, and in our use-case, has done > > everything as advertised in the manuals and in the "Arista Warrior" > > O'Reilly publication. So we haven't had to struggle... but then agai

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vs Arista

2018-08-14 Thread Saku Ytti
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 09:35, Mark Tinka wrote: > The Arista code is so Cisco-like, and in our use-case, has done > everything as advertised in the manuals and in the "Arista Warrior" > O'Reilly publication. So we haven't had to struggle... but then again, > our deployment is very simple - Layer