Re: [j-nsp] PE-CE issue with OSPF routes not getting into routing table

Hi, I did not read this mail. The dn bit is set indicating routing loop Regards, Jay From: Krasimir Avramski Sent: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 14:47:33 GMT+0530 To: "Raymond, Adam" Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PE-CE issue with OSPF routes not getting into ro

Re: [j-nsp] PE-CE issue with OSPF routes not getting into routing table

Hi,Did you check the igp between the p and peRegards, Jay From: "Raymond, Adam via juniper-nsp" Sent: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 07:49:35 GMT+0530 To: juniper-nsp Subject: [j-nsp] PE-CE issue with OSPF routes not getting into routing table Hi,

Re: [j-nsp] PE-CE issue with OSPF routes not getting into routing table

Hello, LSA  172.16.64.0   has DN-bit set : "Opt 0xa2" xlates to 1010 0010 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4576#page-4 As to whether You want DN bit cleared (which is possible) to fix Your problem - please carefully review Your design and make an informed decision afterwards, not before. HTH

Re: [j-nsp] PE-CE issue with OSPF routes not getting into routing table

Hi, The route from your output has DN bit set (Opt 0xa2) and it is loop prevention mechanism as described in rfc4577. More info from Juniper docs: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topics/usage-guidelines/vpns-configuring-routing-between-pe-and-ce-routers-in-layer-3-vpns.html Best