On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 00:19, Martin T wrote:
> in PFE) could indeed be affected. On the other hand, the overall LC
> CPU usage according to "sh linux cpu usage" did not exceed 80% even
> during the route churn, but I actually do not know what exactly this
> utilization means..
Like ethernet, CP
Sorry I don't have mc-lag configs for vMX, but I did do mc-lag on vQFX...
Here is some quick outputs from my eve-ng lab...
I have mc-lag between (2) vQFX devices... and actually, the lag client side
is one vMX node...
Here's one side of the mc-lag pair... I grabbed some commands that I recall
be
Hi,
I built a setup where vMX(local-as 64512) has following 20 eBGP
neighbors over point-to-point connections:
AS64513: vmx1[ge-0/0/6.13] <-> [ge-0.0.6.13]PC
AS64514: vmx1[ge-0/0/6.14] <-> [ge-0.0.6.14]PC
AS64515: vmx1[ge-0/0/6.15] <-> [ge-0.0.6.15]PC
AS64516: vmx1[ge-0/0/6.16] <-> [ge-0.0.6.16]P
Hello all,
I tried to mount a MC-LAG between two VMXs (using EVE-NG). I note that the
lacp protocol is not operational.
I did some research (including on this forum). The explanations I find are
a little complicated. That's why I post this message. If anyone among you
has a simple solution for thi
4 matches
Mail list logo