Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:54 PM Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
wrote:
> Nathan, I am not sure what you want to hear, or what would make you
> satisfied, but YES Juniper [IT?] did screw-up, and a restore from back-up
> was/is not possible. So this situation is now being worked on, unfortun
I cannot agree more, but unfortunately not my area to affect. BTW, in 40 years
in networking working for multiple vendors, every company has room (and
sometime great room) for improvement, . . .
Richard McGovern
Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
978-618-3342
On 5/9/19, 8:11 AM, "James C
As someone who has a P1 case open on the QFX10008 (8.4R1.8) [WMU has retreated
to 8.1R3.3] now sitting at day 15 that produced
three different types of core dumps with issues on the ULC-30Q28, ULC-60S-6Q,
and MSNOOPD, it would be really nice to go fishing
on the bugs myself. I have found th
Tom, sorry but that is way far-fetched. Nathan, if TAC will not provide you
this info, then I am sure your local SE can assist. I know I can/would for any
of my accounts.
Rich
Richard McGovern
Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
978-618-3342
On 5/9/19, 5:02 AM, "Tom Hodgson" wrote:
Nathan, I am not sure what you want to hear, or what would make you satisfied,
but YES Juniper [IT?] did screw-up, and a restore from back-up was/is not
possible. So this situation is now being worked on, unfortunately at a not so
fast pace. I hope you decide to stay with Juniper, as I feel th
https://kb.juniper.net/KB33515
If i recall correctly what i heard about it.
There is some third party(or smth) search engine which is(was) used and
it had issues. And there is no way to upgrade/fix that engine as it out
of support/development.
So i has to be replaced or re-written from scratc
Alternative solution. Keep doing route based tunnels, but use traffic
selectors. I use it to have the remote end doing policy based ipsec (old
cisco cpe as an example) while keeping the SRX as a route (st interface)
based ipsec implementation.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topi
>> And regarding PRs delta between your present release and 17.4R2-S2 release
>> , JTAC is not authorised to provide that info. I suggest you to reach out
>> to juniper accounts team who can help you on this
>
> Why? I have no idea, maybe this engineer was just lazy but I’ve had the same
> fr
8 matches
Mail list logo
