Hi Dario,
furthermore, 4 GB RAM is not much nowadays. I’d recommend looking for some
1800x4’s or -X6’s.
Best regards,
Theo Voss
Von: juniper-nsp im Auftrag von Mark
Tinka
Datum: Freitag, 1. November 2019 um 20:06
An: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Betreff: Re: [j-nsp] MX480 / RE-S-2000-4096
My situation might be different than yours, but, I'm using vlan tags in
junos vMX on eve-ng... (17.4R1.16)
root@sabn-960-e> show interfaces ae161.0
Logical interface ae161.0 (Index 344) (SNMP ifIndex 546)
Flags: Up SNMP-Traps 0x20004000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.10 ] Encapsulation:
VLAN-Bridge
❦ 4 novembre 2019 11:02 -05, Jason Lixfeld :
> Running the JunOS VRR image on EVE-NG trying to get a vlan
> sub-interface working on em0:
It doesn't work when using virtio, but it works with e1000. Dunno if
EVE-NG allows you to pick which NIC device to use.
--
Don't go around saying the world
Jason, I don't think vlan sub-interfaces are supported. We used multiple
interfaces mapped to different vlans via the Hypervisor. You can map em0 to
vlan 14 and em1 to vlan 45, ...
--
Clinton Work
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Running the JunOS VRR image
Hey,
Running the JunOS VRR image on EVE-NG trying to get a vlan sub-interface
working on em0:
root@R4# show interfaces em0
traps;
vlan-tagging;
mtu 1614;
hold-time up 1 down 0;
unit 14 {
vlan-id 14;
family inet {
address 100.1.4.4/24;
}
family iso;
family inet6 {
5 matches
Mail list logo