On 18/Dec/19 19:47, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to follow up on a thread from a couple of years ago about the MX10003 > > https://lists.gt.net/nsp/juniper/63670?search_string=mx10003 > > We’ve got a bunch of MX204s that we use for peering and transit over LDP > based L3VPN pinned up with IS-IS and BFD. We’re quite happy with these boxes > from a cost, density and feature perspective. We’ve had no issues with them > at all so far in the few months that they’ve been in the field. > > Now, we’re looking for something to use in the same role, but with higher > 100G port density. The MX10003 seems like a good fit from a cost perspective > verses something like an MX240, but also from a feature and performance > perspective because it uses the same hardware as the MX204 in terms of EA > Trios and CPU on the MPC, along with the CPU and memory on the RE (except the > MX204 has 32GB on the RE as opposed to 64GB on the MX10003). > > Wondering how folks are feeling about these boxes a couple of years later.
We like the MX10003 as a 100Gbps edge router. It comes with the additional port density and hardware redundancy that the MX204 doesn't have, so it does have a role to play. For customers that want 100Gbps ports, we will dump them on the MX10003. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
