On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 17:21, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> I could be wrong, but the way I understand it, the original SCB only has
> 80Gb/s of fabric capacity. While the 16XGE MPC will technically work, it will
> only work at half capacity. For full throughput capability, you would need
> two SCBs f
On 26/Feb/20 17:03, Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp wrote:
> In general, IMHO, if looking to upgrade older MXs, you should always at least
> look at an MX204 solution too.
I was thinking about this too, but that would depend on what the OP
wants to use the router for.
The only advice I'd giv
--- Begin Message ---
I could tell you what that knob is for, but I would need to kill you afterwards
__
I believe that knob can be set to Enhanced IP even with older SCB. I have a
customer with this set, older SCB, no issues.
Just sat, this knob should always be set to Enhanced IP for best
p
On 2/26/20, 9:38 AM, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Benjamin Collet"
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:05:16PM +0100, Marcel Bößendörfer wrote:
> The MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP even works with a 710-021523 / SCB-MX :-)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:11:50AM -0500, Brendan Mannella wrote:
> We
I'd avoid the older RE-S-2000-4096-S with multiple full tables and newer code.
I have some older lab boxes that can't really handle it, but I keep them around
just for lab testing. I had to trim down the full tables with AS Path Length
filters to keep them from running out of RAM, swapping, an
--- Begin Message ---
#1, yes 16XGE module works with all varieties if SCB. I assume you already own
the equipment list. I therefore 'think' your question/concern is with such
equipment, any concern going from 16.2 to some later release, which I am
guessing might be something like 18.4R2-S3 (T
The documentation states its supported:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/enhanced-mx-scb-description-mx960.html
It doesn't support "Enhanced IP/Enhanced Ethernet mode" though
whatever that is...
Dave
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 14:37, Benjamin Coll
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:05:16PM +0100, Marcel Bößendörfer wrote:
> The MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP even works with a 710-021523 / SCB-MX :-)
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:11:50AM -0500, Brendan Mannella wrote:
> We have MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP and SCBE working in production. Haven’t noticed
> any issues.
That's
We have MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP and SCBE working in production. Haven’t noticed
any issues.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:04 AM Benjamin Collet wrote:
> Hi Alain,
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:46:42AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
> > Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL. My experience with 16.2 was
The MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP even works with a 710-021523 / SCB-MX :-)
Am Mi., 26. Feb. 2020 um 15:03 Uhr schrieb Benjamin Collet <
juniper-...@clt.tf>:
> Hi Alain,
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:46:42AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
> > Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL. My experience with 16.2 w
Hi Alain,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:46:42AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
> Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL. My experience with 16.2 was
> pretty solid.
>
> We're planning to have 3 Full Routes BGP and the MPLS alphabet soup,
> yadi yada.
>
> We don't want 2 RE since we'll use 2
The things Sebastian suggested definitely make sense. Otherwise (if it's a
really really really good offer), go for it. For the things you've
mentioned it'll do its job well. Also, JunOS 17.3 works just fine with it
btw :-)
Am Mi., 26. Feb. 2020 um 14:57 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Wiesinger <
sebast...
* Alain Hebert [2020-02-26 14:47]:
> Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL. My experience with 16.2 was
> pretty solid.
>
> We're planning to have 3 Full Routes BGP and the MPLS alphabet soup,
> yadi yada.
>
> We don't want 2 RE since we'll use 2 MX240 and there is no point to go
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of
> Saku Ytti
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 9:52 AM
> To: Jeff Haas
> Cc: Juniper NSP
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Next-table, route leaking, etc.
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 00:26, Jeff Haas wrote:
>
> > The problem and example in
Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL. My experience with 16.2 was
pretty solid.
We're planning to have 3 Full Routes BGP and the MPLS alphabet
soup, yadi yada.
We don't want 2 RE since we'll use 2 MX240 and there is no point to
go for ISSU since the RE is EOL.
1x CHAS-BP-M
15 matches
Mail list logo