Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MVPN and tunnel interfaces.

s > Total 0 displayed, Up 0, Down 0 > > misak@MX80-HRAZDAN> > > > > Bikram Singh wrote: > > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:28:56 +0400 > > > From: m.khachatr...@gnc.am > > > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > > Subj

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MVPN and tunnel interfaces.

> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:28:56 +0400 > From: m.khachatr...@gnc.am > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper MVPN and tunnel interfaces. > Is this PE also acting as a transit to other PE for Multicast traffic ? can u share below show mpls lsp p2mp ? -bs

Re: [j-nsp] SRX100 LDAP

> From: sbik...@live.com > To: xamalon...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:14:31 +0530 > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX100 LDAP > > > > > tried everything nothing helps... i`m begining to think that i have broken > > srx =)) or something like that. it did no

Re: [j-nsp] SRX100 LDAP

tion . Only define ldap-options under profile and delete it from global level . What ldap server are you using ? The Configuration I shared earlier are the working ones . Bikram 2014-03-20 1:30 GMT+06:00 Bikram Singh : á > set access ldap-options base-distinguished-name DC=tp,DC=

Re: [j-nsp] SRX100 LDAP

> set access ldap-options base-distinguished-name DC=tp,DC=ru > set access ldap-options search search-filter sAMAccountName= > set access ldap-options search admin-search distinguished-name > cn=junos,dc=tp,dc=ru > set access ldap-options search admin-search password > "$9$k.TFtu1RcyAtWLX7VbfTQ3

Re: [j-nsp] move routes from VRF to inet.0

> > There might be a couple of alternate solutions coming to mind: > 1. move all internet Routes to the CE1 table and use static routes to point > back at the VRF with next-table from inet.0 which will not really scale > beyond a single l3vpn. > 2. use a separate VRF for the internet routes and

Re: [j-nsp] Procedure for upgrade routing engines.

Below link demonstrates the upgrade process http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/task/configuration/64-bit-junos-upgrading.html Bikram From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu To: m.khachatr...@gnc.am Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:24:38 +0200 CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Mx5 bgp export terms

one thing i forgot to mention the BGP route which is inactive still needs to be a best bgp route only then it will be advertised . From: sbik...@live.com To: rodr...@1telecom.com.br; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Mx5 bgp export terms Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:47:55 +0530 I

Re: [j-nsp] Mx5 bgp export terms

If you want to advertise inactive BGP routes then you can use below knob to do it. advertise-inactive http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/reference/configuration-statement/advertise-inactive-edit-protocols-bgp.html > From: rodr...@1telecom.com.br > Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013

Re: [j-nsp] ISIS authentication issue

have you configured authentication on interface(in ISIS) as well on mx960? - B > From: jneiber...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:08:54 -0600 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] ISIS authentication issue > > We've got an MX960 connected to a Cisco CRS, both of which are co

Re: [j-nsp] Multicast - interop with Cisco

check if your mt- tunnel is up between these 2 PEs show pim neighbors instance iptv and also please check the reachability issues in the vrf as its in vpn -B . > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:14:43 +0100 > From: pederb...@gmail.com > To: st...@acm.org > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subje

Re: [j-nsp] J-Flow Configuration on MX5

have you enabled NTP ? because this is the requirement for jflow v5 to work in junos. -B > From: molas...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:20:26 +0700 > To: ns.ha...@gmail.com > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J-Flow Configuration on MX5 > > Hi Nikita, > > *I believe