Re: [j-nsp] proposed changes to "clear bgp neighbor"

Phil, I think what you propose sounds like a reasonable and appropriately-scoped response to a real problem. Brent Sweeny Indiana University On 2/26/2014 7:36 AM, Phil Shafer wrote: > Juniper users, > > We've been asked to make a change the "clear bgp neighbor" comman

Re: [j-nsp] ip fragmentation, different mtu sizes

u (or ip mtu for that matter), if i send out l3 packets > bigger than the protocol mtu (without seting up df bit), why didn't the > expected ip fragmentations happen? > > > > > On Tuesday, 17 December 2013 9:13 PM, Brent Sweeny > wrote: > you're correct that th

Re: [j-nsp] ip fragmentation, different mtu sizes

ckets by turning on the no-fragment flag. On JunOS, it's 'do-not-fragment'; in IOS, it depends a lot on the version but it's there.HTH. brent sweeny, indiana university On 12/17/2013 8:03 PM, snort bsd wrote: > hi, all: > > i have a genetic question regarding ip

[j-nsp] Juniper MX2020 operational experience?

now that the MX2020 has been out for a few months, can anyone share operational experience with it? how has it gone, after all? How does the short- to medium-term future look for it and its smaller sister, the 2010? thanks! Brent Sweeny, Indiana University