A network I operate is going with:
bgp-error-tolerance {
malformed-route-limit 0;
}
The thoughts being that there is no real reason to retain the malformed route
and the default of 1000 is arbitrary. We haven't really seen a rash of them, so
adjusting the logging has
I'd try the 'notification-rib' chunk in the 'validation' stanza of the
routing-instance and see if setting inet.0 there pushes the DB the way you
need. Certain versions of JunOS are quite broken going the other way, so I've
had to enumerate all of the routing-instances that I want to be sure hav
+1 on a MX10008 as well running 19.4R3.11 using the Mellanox QSA and a 3rd
party optic.
Xcvr 1NON-JNPR WFEXP96L176 SFP+-10G-LR
Physical interface: xe-0/4/1:0
Laser bias current: 39.946 mA
Laser output power:
> On Jun 27, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Thomas Bellman wrote:
>
> On 2018-06-26 21:38, David Sinn wrote:
>
>> OSPF scales well to many multiples of 1000's of devices.
>
> Is that true even for Clos (spine & leaf) networks, and in a single area?
Yes for multi-tiered C
le in my
> network. the point being, different use cases, different environments. Always
> design your network to allow for forward progression else you will be wasting
> more time and dealing with more problems
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:19 AM David Sinn <mailto:ds...@dsinn.
At most networks scale you won't notice the difference, but OSPF will also
converge faster then BGP at very large scale. Adding on top the costs of
re-using AS's in a eBGP world, verses mutual-RR with iBGP, having a good
summarization plan with OSPF is a bit more trivial and retains a overall n
Stefan,
Completely agree with you. It's not just financials that want low latency.
Two other categories, off the top of my head, are anyone building HPC clusters
and anytime you have a virtual element the network is providing the
connectivity (disk being a prime example). For HPC, latency is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've noticed the same problem on my J's too. Looks to be a uniqueness
in the implementation of the DHCP server in JunOS. DHCPd under Linux
and Cisco's built-in DHCP server do not exhibit the same behavior.
What I've been able to track it to is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using a Kingston Elite Pro 4GB on my J2350 for a good while now.
Amazon's URL for the item is: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000Y0ZGS2
David
ELITE PRO CF CARD
On Jun 30, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Patrik Olsson wrote:
Hello!
I have been using S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At least for my DSL setup in the US I needed to set the VCI to be
fully qualified:
vci 0.35;
IIRC when I did just "vci 35" it did not come up.
David
On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Mike Mainer wrote:
Don't know much help this will have but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Only thing you might want to consider adding is the "log" keyword to
your discard term. Just makes things a little quicker when you add a
new protocol that you need the RE to handle that you didn't update
your control-plane filter to support (n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
interface ATM3/0.1163 point-to-point
ip unnumbered Loopback1
atm route-bridged ip SECRET SAUCE HERE
pvc 0/1163
encapsulation aal5snap
!
The above is what Cisco calls "route bridged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I was last at Juniper EBC in CA they had a stack of them at the
entrance.
They also made up a new batch that is "I [heart] JUNOS Software" with
JUNOS Software in Juniper blue. One was in my copy of JUNOS
Enterprise Routing you got free f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You may also want to check out these:
http://forums.cacti.net/about12792.html
Works for the J-series I had it pointed at at one point.
David
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:24 PM, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:
Hi,
If you are tacking about http://forums.cacti.
14 matches
Mail list logo
