Re: [j-nsp] Juniper authorization with tacacs+

to strip the access ...request, restart, configure, etc. Thanks, Eduardo Eduardo Barrios, EIT, JNCIP-SP Telecommunications Specialist Lower Colorado River Authority  | 3505 Montopolis Dr. |  Austin, TX 78744 -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.neth

Re: [j-nsp] PIC Oversubscription Show Commands

but you have to scroll down to the section: Packet Forwarding Engine Chassis Queues: Queues: 8 supported, 8 in use . . . This from KBs. http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB27400 Eduardo Barrios, EIT, JNCIP-SP Telecommunications Specialist Lower Colorado River Autho

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF Confusion

ospf database external detail"), use only external cost and not take into account the link-state metric in your diagram. * You might have to write an export policy: from protocol static + any route-filter that you need, then accept and also add metric xx Thanks, Eduardo Eduardo Barrios,

Re: [j-nsp] PIC Oversubscription Show Commands

ueues and knowing the loss was due to the traffic flow oversubscribing the PIC. Thanks, Eduardo Eduardo Barrios, EIT, JNCIP-SP Telecommunications Specialist Lower Colorado River Authority | 3505 Montopolis Dr. | Austin, TX 78744 512.730.6332 ph -Original Message- From: junipe

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP neighbor sequence changes

gorithms though. Not sure how RSVP path refresh messages are sent across LAGs. Thanks, Eduardo Eduardo Barrios, EIT, JNCIP-SP Telecommunications Specialist Lower Colorado River Authority | 3505 Montopolis Dr. | Austin, TX 78744 512.730.6332 ph -Original Message- Fr

Re: [j-nsp] [External] Another SRX240 VPLS question - "trunking" multiple VLANs through single VPLS

xible-ethernet-services; aggregated-ether-options { lacp { active; } } ... unit 980 { description Customer-data-vlan980; encapsulation vlan-vpls; vlan-id 980; family vpls { <<< filter { input Customer-mf; } } }

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX240 to Alcatel SAS-M epipe

@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX240 to Alcatel SAS-M epipe On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 09:01:46AM -0500, Eduardo Barrios wrote: > Tom, > > We have a couple of VPLS instances b/t a Juniper M10i and an Alcatel7705. The > difference seems to be 14. Unfortunately Alcatel does

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX240 to Alcatel SAS-M epipe

uardo -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 9:14 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Eduardo Barrios; Tomasz Mikołajek Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX240 to Alcatel SAS-M epipe On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 04:01:46 PM Eduardo Ba

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX240 to Alcatel SAS-M epipe

sap 1/1/7:1 create ingress qos 70 exit egress qos 70 exit exit mesh-sdp 3:981 vc-type vlan create exit no shutdown exit Good Luck, Edu

Re: [j-nsp] LN2600: an 8SFP Branch SRX

olar flare theory. ;-) Also utilities are beginning to run their protective relay protocols through IP networks so they are looking for reliability or risk blowing out $2mil transformers. I've been testing the LN2600 and yes it does run the SRX code. HTH, Eduardo Eduardo Barrios, EIT, J

Re: [j-nsp] MTU problems over VPLS

We use RSVP LSPs and set the Adspec attribute to autodiscover the LSP MTU hop by hop during the path setup. We also set the MTU on the PE-CE facing interface. Finally set the VPLS mtu in the routing-instance --- It has to match on all PEs that we run the VPLS instance, we do this to interop with

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS and QoS at penultimate hop ?

Just looking at the output on the PHP router the S bit is set to 0, so this means there is at least one additional label present - most likely the VPN label? I too would echo what others have that the classification is done before the POP action. Once the transport label is popped, then the VP

[j-nsp] MPLS FRR and EXP bits

Hello List, I was told that the EXP bits do not carry over during a fast reroute event that is configured for Facility many-to-one (ie a bypass tunnel). So essentially the third label in the stack is the RSVP tunnel setup by the point of local repair and it does not carry the EXP QoS markings

[j-nsp] QoS - to share a network control queue or not?

Greetings, I work for a company in the utility industry and we are building out a small MPLS network. Concerning QoS, we will offer our internal customers queues with different levels of service along with a network control queue (NC) for their own needs. Is it ok to mix a customer's NC with o