On 13-10-23 11:59 AM, pkc_mls wrote:
> Le 23/10/2013 17:15, Gabriel Blanchard a écrit :
>> are the ciscos configured with a distributed port-channel as well? (On a
>> rethx from the SRX i'm assuming)
> Hi,
> Can you please indicate what a distributed port channel is ?
are the ciscos configured with a distributed port-channel as well? (On a
rethx from the SRX i'm assuming)
On 13-10-23 11:12 AM, pkc_mls wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running a cluster of srx 240 connected to a pair of cisco 2960
> switches with a port channel.
>
> ESXi servers are also connected to the
I'm attempting to turn up an VPLS circuit and it appears that only one
side is showing as Up while the other is showing as VC-Dn
I turned on a trace and seeing this error message
Jul 16 10:46:59.190366 [vc_intf_vc_status_update] Recomputing the status
of the VC for interface: vpls-7.2.3, flags 0x
We run pretty much exactly what you describe in the 100Gbps+ scale using
MX480s with RE-S-1800 and don't have any problems.
Contact me off list if you need any tips.
On 13-07-02 04:58 AM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've only really dealt with traffic levels under 20Gbps. I have a client
> tha
chard Hesse [mailto:richard.he...@weebly.com<http://weebly.com>]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 5:52 PM
To: Gabriel Blanchard
Cc: Drew Weaver; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Inline jflow AS Lookup Failures
Did you report the crash to Junip
I tried 12.3. Crashed within 24h
On 2013-06-28, at 2:59 PM, Drew Weaver
wrote:
> How much of a disaster (vs 11.4) are we guessing that 12.3R3 is going to be?
>
> From: Richard Hesse [mailto:richard.he...@weebly.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:58 PM
> To: Drew Weaver
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck
Same thing here, that or I had to
deactivate security vpn
commit
and reactivate.
commit
On 13-03-20 02:03 PM, Bjørn Tore wrote:
> As I mentioned offline - I once had to reboot an SRX 240 after changing IPSEC
> config, to make things come up. Might not be the case here, but with the code
> qual
If it's for a lab...why not run greatest and latest? if not, run the
recommended.
On 13-02-07 03:08 PM, Steve Feldman wrote:
> I have a couple of shiny new MX40s in my lab, and need to do some testing
> before we deploy them.
>
> They will be doing fairly vanilla BGP (~2 full feeds), IS-IS and/o
On 12-11-26 10:05 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> This is very new feature to JunOS. I think 12.1 for T4k. And maybe 12.2 for
> MX, unsure.
>
Thanks, I just got confirmation from Juniper that this is indeed
supported as of 12.2 on MX.
-Gabe
___
juniper-nsp
Has anyone on this list been able to implement uRPF to work in a
multi-homed environment? I'm trying to implement it so that it black
holes traffic based on source address and so far what I've read tells me
this is not supported.
-Gabe
___
juniper-nsp ma
We have simple filters configured on our 10Gbps as well on our DPCs and
can definitely push more than 8gbps. Though mostly in one direction. Are
you saying it's limited to 8gbps in both directions?
I'm curious to know which Junos version you are running.
Gabriel Blanchar
/techpubs/en_US/junose9.3/information-products/topic-collections/broadband-access/service-definition-examples.html
Only thing is, you will need the service management license.
Gabriel Blanchard
Director, Information Technology
TekSavvy Solutions
On 11-10-20 01:40 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Thanks fo
mlppp
On 08/21/2011 08:11 PM, Martin T wrote:
Is it possible to load-balance traffic between a Juniper M10i and
Cisco 1812 using two different last-mile(ADSL2+) providers? Topology
should be like this:
http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/8766/loadb.png
Idea is to use both ADSL2+ links simultane
considering that the ERX series is being decommissioned soon and
"replaced" by the expensive E series I'm also very interested.
Somehow I doubt that the MX80s are as capable as the ERXes when it comes
to BRAS stuff.
-Gabe
On 08/18/2011 02:49 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
We are just heading down
We have a very similar setup (for some obvious reason) and it works just
fine. We use Framed-IP-Address. No other attributes are required.
What I suggest is that you try the "test aaa" command in the ERX and try
to test the login that way from the console and see what's going on.
-Gabe
On 08
try turning on BGP debugging on the ERX. It's likely a timer expiry like you
pointed out but at least that way you'll be able to tell where the problem lies.
-Gabe
On 2011-05-02, at 7:19 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi there.
>
>
>
> Turning up an ERX-310 for a customer - it's multihomed to 2 d
The policer is dropping packets in order to slow down your connection to
10mbps. In my opinion this is working perfectly.
On 2011-04-04, at 8:30 AM, "Martin T" wrote:
> With such configuration: http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/3162/iperftest.png
>
> ..there is still packet loss present:
>
How much if I may ask?
-Gabe
On 2011-03-24, at 12:41 PM, Giuliano Medalha wrote:
> You can take more advantage with MX80-5 new promotional bunde.
>
> It supports 20 x SFP Interfaces, came with ADC-R License , TRIO3D chipset
> and 2GB DRAM (4m rib routes).
>
> It came with 4 x XFP slots (blocke
flow-tools
On 2011-03-22, at 2:03 PM, Michael Lee wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to eval netflow collector for multi-vendor hardwares, anyone
> could suggest any good commercial netflow collector running on Linux?
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~mike
> ___
> junip
I had the same problem... I couldn't figure it out a few years back
What you need to do is just feed it with the appropriate .rel file and the ERX
will automatically pull all the other required files on it's own via ftp.
-Gabe
On 2011-01-07, at 3:17 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
>
>
Hey,
I'm attempting to dynamically tunnel switch some of our users.
The requirement is that the tunnel is initiated from a different virtual router
and it appears that the radius attribute that I'm using simply doesn't work.
t...@teksavvy.com Cleartext-Password := "test123"
On 2010-10-25, at 5:05 PM, Richard Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is
> similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then
> considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad.
> The DRAM may be upgra
>
>
> to use a DHCP-server to do the address-management should work in
> general. The docs say so:
>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose82/swconfig-broadband/html/dhcp-server-config6.html
>
Thanks. I happen to have found this information just today.
>
>
> and I've heard about it
We are trying to configure multiple ERXs 310 to share a Pool of IPs to
assign to DSL customers. These ERXs are acting as LNSes.
The problem is that right now we are statically configuring each of
the ERXs with different Pools of IPs. We would like all of them to be
able to share the same Poo
24 matches
Mail list logo
