[j-nsp] Fwd: q-pic-large-buffer SRX550

e-buffer { ## ## Warning: statement ignored: unsupported platform (srx550) ## large-scale; } } } Regards, Gabriel Farias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] health-monitor as the cause?

Please not response, Publishing again? 2016-06-16 16:18 GMT-03:00 Gabriel Farias : > Message: health-monitor as the cause? > > Hello members, > > > There are many options to monitor the health of Juniper equipment with > Junos, the record of events usually are via snmp and l

[j-nsp] health-monitor as the cause?

onitor: RE 0 CPU utilization crossed falling threshold 30 (value: 23), (variable: jnxOperatingCPU.9.1.0.0) Jun 16 13:20:14 RT0001AMZ snmpd[923]: SNMPD_HEALTH_MON_THRESH_CROSS: Health Monitor: RE 0 CPU utilization crossed rising threshold 40 (value: 44), (variable: jnxOperatingCPU.9.1.0.0) Regards

[j-nsp] SRX550 packet-mode

size bytes per packet. I thank those who have the information. Gabriel Farias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] JFlow configuration with logical systems

interface lo0.501; protocols { bgp { log-updown; group PEER-1 How we set it in logical systems, or it is done globally? Gabriel Farias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@p

[j-nsp] Traffic Engineering via LSP

Hi members, I need to do traffic engineering in backbone IP/MPLS from point A to point B, but just need some prefixes, part of the traffic is sent via TE and I'm seeing all traffic exiting via TE from point A to B. *What do I need to send only the prefix 10.152.42.0/25 via TE and not all traffic*

Re: [j-nsp] Logical-Systems Management SNMP

gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jun 17 16:35:32 snmpd[5709] >>> Get-Next-Request Jun 17 16:35:32 snmpd[5709] >>> Source: 10.31.0.236 Jun 17 16:35:32 snmpd[5709] >>> Destination: 10.251.42.230 Jun 17 16:35:32 snmpd[5709

[j-nsp] Logical-Systems Management SNMP

needed? Thanks, Gabriel Farias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Logical-Systems serie M and MX

oups etc can be used) > > If you have tunnel capabilities in the chassis (check for presence of lt-* > interface) you can interconnect LS's in this way. > > Alan > > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Gabriel Farias < > gabrielfaria...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [j-nsp] Logical-Systems serie M and MX

Thanks this would be the only option? Best regard, Gabriel Farias 2010/5/28 Mohan Nanduri > you can configure bgp session between the logical systems, as they are like > a true separate router. > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Gabriel Farias > wrote: > >> Hel

[j-nsp] Logical-Systems serie M and MX

with J-net and also in part of Juniper support site and found much documentation, but nothing talking about this specific issue. Thanks, Gabriel Farias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

Gabriel Farias 2010/4/5 Serge Vautour > Hello, > > eBGP shouldn't come into play here. Your physical interfaces are bundled as > 1 logical interface (ae0). Load balancing over L3 LAG interfaces works the > same as ECMP links. You have to configure this: > > > ht

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

Stefan, This configuration has no effect, because the connection (PE x CE) uses EBGP routing within the VRF dados. What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces of RT110, you have any other suggestions? Thanks Gabriel Farias 2010/4/5 mail-list > try this and see

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

Stefan, Any suggestions to correct this imbalance? Thanks, Gabriel Farias 2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias > Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration: > > *Interfaces*: > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0 > description "*BA* G2/47 - SW001"; > gigether

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

alance. > > Thanks, > > > Stefan Fouant > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > -- > *From: * Gabriel Farias > *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0300 > *To: * > *Cc: *; > *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos > > I'm not using E

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

I'm not using EBGP external type in PE (M120) Reagards, Gabriel Farias 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant > Do you have multi-path enabled on your EBGP sessions? > > Stefan Fouant > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > ---------- > *From: * Gabriel

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

configuration routing-instance not have all the options. Thanks Gabriel Farias 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant > You need the following: > > 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance' > > and > > 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then load-bal

[j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

-balance { indexed-next-hop; } hash-key { family inet { layer-3; layer-4; } } Thanks, Gabriel Farias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp