Re: [j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"?

Giuliano From: Catalin Dominte Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 7:26 PM To: Giuliano C. Medalha ; Gert Doering ; Richard McGovern Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"? Good Evening, >>> For example. If

Re: [j-nsp] Thanks for all the fish

ichard McGovern Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 7:16 PM To: Giuliano C. Medalha ; Alexandre Guimaraes ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Aaron Gould Subject: Re: Re: [j-nsp] Thanks for all the fish #1 jewel HPE (Aruba) is interested in is Juniper/MIST AI. MIST AI and ML is also being integrated

Re: [j-nsp] Thanks for all the fish

Alexandre, Goodnight. JUNIPER has 2 very powerful jewels that don't make any sense for HPe to throw them away. One of them is the JUNOS operating system and now the JUNOS-EVO. The other thing is related to the JUNIPER NPUs: TRIO and Express ( to compete with other vendors - cisco, arista, nok

Re: [j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"?

Good evening guys, how are you ? If I can contribute a little. Looking from a timeline standpoint... the MX204 passed: - MX204 with -IR and R licenses ( which were perpetual ) - MX204-P-BASE ( Which was the transition box from -IR and -R to Flex License ) - MX204-HW-BASE ( Advanced and Premium

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Aaron, I think the problem is related to the following: > show rout? - route - routing .. Think ... that is the problem of autocomplete that everyone is talking about. At.te Giuliano -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Aaron Gould via juniper-nsp Sent: Thursday, Oct

[j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

Good morning All good ? Anyone already running MX304 as an edge, using ipfix, flowspec and telemetry features on the same box ? Any problems related with that ? If so, what version of Junos are you using? Thanks Giuliano WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. Copyright (c) 2

[j-nsp] JUNIPER 400G ZR+ HP

Goodnight, All good ? Is anyone on the list already carrying out tests with JUNIPER's coherent optical elements ( OpenZR+ High Power) ... in PTX10001-36MR or ACX7100-32C (or 48L) ? The following bundle that is available: QDD-4C-ZRM-HP-P-B https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products/pluggable-optic

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 Port Layout

> Hello good afternoon. > > Please have a look at the following documentation: > > > https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.juniper.net%2Fblogs%2Freema-ray%2F2023%2F03%2F28%2Fmx304-deepdive&data=05%7C01%7Cgiuliano%40wztech.com.br%7Cc7b64b057b6b488bff0d08db68

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 Port Layout

Hello good afternoon. Please have a look at the following documentation: https://community.juniper.net/blogs/reema-ray/2023/03/28/mx304-deepdive It will have everything you need to do with it, including the pictures. Our first boxes are arriving this next month in Brazil. By the specs of the

Re: [j-nsp] ACX7100 route scale

Remember to check ipfix and flowspec scale and availability for acx7100 ... if you are going to use these features. Get Outlook for iOS From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Mihai via juniper-nsp Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2022 9:20:29 AM To:

Re: [j-nsp] ACX7100 route scale

Good Morning Think it is 10M RIB and 1.5M FIB ( need to check ) Juniper has published a lot of public materials about ACX7100 scale Covering the following topics: 1. EVPN MAC-VRF (E-LAN): https://lnkd.in/eWRv_VtY 2. EVPN VPWS: https://lnkd.in/eRKhnkgr 3. L3VPN and 6VPE: https://lnkd.in/ee__V

Re: [j-nsp] GRE tunnels on a QFX10002-60C

MX204 was announced at EoS We have used MX204 for last 5 years. It was a huge success for any function it was designed. Juniper only recommend to us ( about gre projects ) in mx product line Are you going to use mx304 after this year ? Even this box is more expensive ( 5x at least ) Or Junipe

Re: [j-nsp] What is the latest “securing your Juniper device document?

Hello Day One Books could help. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/day-one-books/TW_HardeningJunosDevices_2ndEd.zip Hardening Junos Devices 2nd Ed At.te Giuliano Get Outlook for iOS From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Barry Ravee

Re: [j-nsp] ACX Questions

Hello everyone. We have used the QFX5120 with L2circuit for long. Now in version 19.4R3-S2 it is possible to use this this function in aggregate interfaces. Log time effort to get this function back again. For both 48Y and 32C. The balancing feature is supported only by DLB for now (not FAT or

[j-nsp] PTX10003

Hello everyone Looking for some sharing experiences using the new PTX10003 with junos evo as LSR. We have tried the new box in lab ... but even with the last evo version ... it is showing some strange things in lab with traffic ... some vlan tag and lag problems ... very basic stuff for this k

Re: [j-nsp] How to pick JUNOS Version

Good evening everyone We have had some good experiences with the QFX5120-32C as a P router with MPLS ( 32 x 100G ) . It is running well on several clients in the last few days. We had some problems with the initial code, mainly in network convergence and null traffic in already formed tunnels,

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 vs MX10K

With the new MPC10 you can get 10 x 100G or 15 x 100G per slot in mx240 , mx480 or mx960 But you will need premium 3 chassis with scbe3 boards to have maximum capacity. Get Outlook for iOS From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Tom Beecher Sen

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

Thanks a lot Forgot to put the following on the list: TE / TE++ and auto-bandwidth We will ask them the roadmap for these features too. Get Outlook for iOS From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Saku Ytti Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 5:4

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

update again because all these features are so important to us. Thanks Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Saku Ytti Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 3:26:38 AM To: Giuliano C. Medalha Cc: jnsp list Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX7

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

Hello We did some initial lab teste using 5448 for a client and we have checked with JUNIPER. The major problems we found for our client environment: - No support for FAT (no roadmap); - No support for Entropy Label (no roadmap); - No support for Output Policer or HQOS for VPLS / L2Circuit (n

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240??

Yes MX204 is a super router !!! Very impressive about its performance *Forwarding plane and control plane performance A lot of memory for rib and fib and bng too It is the best router from the last years from Juniper. Hope that they create a new release ( sane success ) using MPC10 piz

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 or QFX5110

Hello EVPN-VXLAN in general is supported using PFL license (QFX) ... that is not too much expensive AFL license will support MPLS (L2circuit) and EVPN MPLS features in some platforms ... but is costs more. https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Enterprise-Cloud-and/Welcome-QFX5120-48Y/ba-p/329900

[j-nsp] EX4650 or QFX5120 Use Case

Hello, Does anyone uses EX4650 or QFX5120 (new products) with JUNOS 18.3 or 18.4 ? Any update for share about the product itself, features (MPLS, EVPN ... ), junos code, scaling, etc ? What kind of use cases are you using this new products ? Is it possible to share any experience ? Thanks a l

Re: [j-nsp] Interconnecting spines in spine & leaf networks [ was Re: Opinions on fusion provider edge ]

. But the main ideia is to use it with evpn/vxlan configuration and try qinq in vtep After that we can post the results here Att Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Aaron1 Sent: Friday

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

Aaron Witch version of Junos are you running in your ACX5048 boxes ? Is it possible to share it ? Thanks Giuliano From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Aaron Gould Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 1:44:59 AM To: Alexandre Guimaraes Cc: Juniper List Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Q

Re: [j-nsp] MX204

People, MX204 is a very good choice. We are using it in some clients. We are using as border BGP, P router (2 x 100 + 2 x 100), PE router in metro (together with INFINERA DCI) and BNG. For BNG we have some clients with 12k users dual stack. We have done some tests using IXIA putting 32K user

Re: [j-nsp] Experience with MX10003

with spirent testcenter. Junos 17.4 already supoorts mx204 and mx10003 and is available for download Att Giuliano Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Pavel Lunin Sent: Thursday, January

Re: [j-nsp] Understanding limitations of various MX104 bundles

Yes you will need junos license Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Josh Baird Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 1:32:12 PM To: Edward Dore Cc: Juniper List Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Understanding

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

I agree The best product in years !!! Amazing and powerfull Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Raphael Maunier Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 1:26:50 PM To: Vincent Bernat Cc

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

You must buy junos license for mx204 because its not included as BB Our SE has confirmed it. And maybe a service contract too ( checking it ) Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Raphael

Re: [j-nsp] MACsec over a service provider

check https://www.infinera.com/technology/optical-network-security/ Att Giuliano Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Alex K. Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:20:55 PM To: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Anyone uses Adaptive Load Balancing?

Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br _ From: Alex K. Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 20:37 Subject: [j-nsp] Anyone uses Adaptive Load Balancing? To: juniper-nsp Hello everyone, A customer of mine, is looking forward for a

Re: [j-nsp] Hyper visor and juniper

We use here KVM ( with contrail ) and VMWare without problems Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS giuli...@wztech.com.br<mailto:giuli...@wztech.com.br> From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Mehul gajjar Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 5:19:15 PM To: junip

Re: [j-nsp] cheapest juniper router capable of lsys

You can use JUNIPER CONTRAIL with a lot of VSRX. One per client. It is a better solution. We are using here with lots of success together with our automation tool. Att Giuliano -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Azeved

Re: [j-nsp] A wierd problem with QinQ at QFX5100

( in cloud ) to provision the vxlan tunnel on each qfx5100 interface. Hope this helps Att, Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br<mailto:giuli...@wztech.com.br> From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Andrew Osnach

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002

Some roadmap ? Giuliano C. Medalha WZTECH NETWORKS +55 (17) 98112-5394 giuli...@wztech.com.br<mailto:giuli...@wztech.com.br> From: Nitzan Tzelniker Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:49:48 AM To: Giuliano C. Medalha Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

[j-nsp] Question about QFX10K

People, Does anyone knows about QFX10K ... if it is possible to configure some kind of flow export ... like NETFLOW or IPFIX ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/ju

[j-nsp] QFX10002

People, Does anyone knows about QFX10002 ... if it is possible to configure some kind of flow export ... like NETFLOW or IPFIX ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/