Re: [j-nsp] EX2300 Supply Delays?

Harald What kind of bugs did you find in EX2300 ? Is it critical ? Some basic functions not working at all ? Thanks a lot Giuliano Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Aug 2016, at 13:59, Harald F. Karlsen wrote: > >> On 26.08.2016 15:31, Skeeve Stevens wrote: >> Does anyone know if the EX2300 has

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN/VXLAN on QFX5100

Joe Qfx5100 does not supoort vpls at least in last 14.1 release Only L2circuit point to point !!! I will double check but it is almost sure ... The correct equipment would be ACX5048 for it EVPN with VXLAN is supoorted but this is a datacenter features that will not transport protocols bpdu .

Re: [j-nsp] juniper router reccomendations

Hello James What do you mean with turbo fib ? Is a new config from 15.1 ? Thanks a lot Giuliano > > > I saw test results from the latest 15.1 with "turbo fib" on RE-1800 that can > do convergence of multiple feed full table in about 55 seconds. And that is > still a single core RPD proc

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Very good !!! Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 98112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/ ​ WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. Copyright © 2016 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. IMPORTANTE: As inf

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

iting configuration mode > > > > {master:0} > > agould@blcn-h-5048> show interfaces ge-0/0/36.0 | grep pack > > Input packets : 18232 > > Output packets: 2 > > > > {master:0} > > agould@blcn-h-5048> show interfaces ge-0/0/36.0 | grep p

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Hum ... I think in ACX you will need to explicit use statistics command ... set interfaces xe-0/0/1 statistics Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 98112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/ ​ WZTECH is registered tra

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5048 - Virtual Chassis

Think this think is not available yet for acx5048 Only september ... I will check for you Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2016, at 18:22, Aaron wrote: > > Anyone ever try to virtual chassis (2) ACX5048's together into one ? > > > > -Aaron > >

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 base model

It is an excelent option We are testing it like metro router righ now It has a lot of good mpls/vpls implementation ( packet mode ) and works fine Good interfaces layout But the problem is related to the business unit ... Of this box The main function is ng firewall and not metro router When

Re: [j-nsp] B-RAS services

Would be better to buy MX104 instead of MX80. Do you need 10G interfaces or not ? If you need only 20 x 1G SFP is better option to use MX104 (MX5 option) because of 4GB DRAM option. Do not forget the to buy SSM license (for CoA) optional ok ? Att, Giuliano Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002 as P Router

Qfx10002 uses Q5 it is a juniper asic not ? Take a look https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Data-Center-Technologists/Juniper-QFX10002-Technical-Overview/ba-p/270358 It is a small monster !!! > On Apr 16, 2016, at 13:40, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > >> On 16/Apr/16 17:58, Richard Hicks wrote: >> >>

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?

Are you going to receive full routing ? Maybe mx104 could be better ... 4GB dram ( important ) with better RE 1.83GHz I think ... ppc ( redundant RE optional) Buy mx104 with 4 sfp+ onboad ports and buy mic modules Same specs i think ... 80 gbps with 55 mpps But you can populate with 4 x mics

Re: [j-nsp] Acx5048 ecmp feature and usage

Engineering team for QFX5100 BU (same Tridend2 box as ACX5048) released a new version with ECMP for MPLS: See the release notes bellow: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.1/information-products/topic-collections/ex-qfx-series/release-notes/ex-ocx-qfx-series-junos-release-notes-14.1X53-

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

The PS are in high power mode ? Position 0 Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 26, 2016, at 17:19, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > 4 High Output AC supplies, only 3 16x10Gbps cards installed with no > optics in them yet > > Power is okay, it's not doing anything yet :P Good idea though! > >> On Fri, Feb

[j-nsp] BGP session down MX104

People Do you have any recent problems with BGP sessions ( going down ) using MX104 and redundant routing engines ? We have a couple of mx104 and from 30 days ago ( simce we changed the mx80 for mx104 on our network) we have suffering with some oscilations on the network ... because the bgp se

Re: [j-nsp] Throughput testing tools on Juniper?

But for MX240, MX480 and MX960 you will need to combine SCB, MPC and MIC to test the chassis ... There is a lot of combinations and possibilities ... SCBE, SCBE2, MPC1, MPC2, MPC3, MPC4, MPC5, NG-MPC-2 and NG-MPC-3. A lot of MIC types ... gig, 10gig, 40gig and 100gig ... Are you going to test per

Re: [j-nsp] Acx5048 vpls vlan-id

10.101.12.250 rmt Up Feb 5 05:59:29 2016 1 >10.101.12.251 rmt Up Feb 5 05:59:29 2016 1 > > Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Gi

[j-nsp] Acx5048 vpls vlan-id

People We are trying to configure vpls routing-instance in a ACX5048 box But the following command does not work after commit ... Routing-instances { VPLS-1 { instance-type vpls; ## ## Warning: statement ignored: unsupported platform (acx5048) ## vlan-id all

Re: [j-nsp] licence keys for MX104

You will need to install the license to use the onboard SFP+ ports (2 o 4 options) Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 98112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/ ​ WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. Cop

Re: [j-nsp] licence keys for MX104

The keys came together with the box inside a letter in a box. Did you check the manuals ? Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 98112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/ ​ WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORK

Re: [j-nsp] Question about 100 Gbps MPC4E

on you are running? > > Thanks, > Paul > > > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Giuliano Medalha > Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 4:35 AM > To: Adam Vitkovsky > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net &g

Re: [j-nsp] Question about 100 Gbps MPC4E

s not coming up? Is the LACP not coming up? Or you can't pass > frames between the VLANs? > > adam > > -Original Message- > > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > > Of Giuliano Medalha > > Sent: 30 January 2015 01:

[j-nsp] Question about 100 Gbps MPC4E

​People, We have a router (MX960) with the following MPC4E board (with SCBE2): http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/mpc4e-2x100ge-8x10ge.html ​ We are using it configured as aggregated ethernet AE3 (with LACP) connecting to a CISCO ASR9000

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 question

Joe, Starting with 14.1X53-D10, QFX5100 supports L2VPN, but only the Martini draft(LDP based), not Kompella(BGP based). See the release notes: Ethernet-over-MPLS (L2 circuit) (QFX5100)—Starting with Junos OS Release 14.1X53-D10, Ethernet-over-MPLS is supported on QFX5100 switches. Ethernet-ove

Re: [j-nsp] QinQ in QFX5100

Not possible. We have a J-TAC case about it ... You will need to change the way you configure the trunk port ... only in a new BRIDGE way ... will work. We did the same think using EX4300 here ... same ELS software and new way to configure: Topology: X__CE1__X ge-0

[j-nsp] Q-in-Q - QFX5100 [ new ELS CLI ]

​P ​eople, We have a simple environment where we need to configure q-in-q using QFX5100 boxes: T TT QFX5100(A) QFX5100(B)--QFX5100(C) - QFX5100(D) T = trunk (interface-mode) 802.1Q A and D elements need to push and p

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper ex9200

Santiago we have a pair of EX9200 working very well with virtual chassis mode. The new SF2 can provide 460 Gbps per slot but there are no modules capable yet to provide it for you (I think) Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 98112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE gi

[j-nsp] JUNIPER L3VPN MPLS LAB - MTU

​Hello everyone, Doing some lab tests with JUNIPER SRX100H2 equipments (packet-mode). Basically we have: --- P3 --- P4 --- - - PE-1 - - PE-2 - - ---

[j-nsp] ACX Series Routers (BGP MPLS L3 VPN RFC 2547bis)

​People, Does anyone using ACX Series considering BGP MPLS L3 VPN (RFC 2547 bis) ? It has some limitation ? Any feature not available ? And about the scalability ? It works fine ?​ Could you please share some practical and real experience ? How many VRF ? Max PPS ? The ASX does use any

[j-nsp] DWDM SFP+ Finisar

People, Does anyone has some experience using SFP+ (10G) DWDM Finisar (3 party optics) in JUNIPER products ? For 40Km or 80 Km ? Following: http://www.finisar.com/sites/default/files/pdf/FINISAR_WDM_Reference_Guide_Jun2008.pdf It works normally in MX240/480/960 or EX4550 ? Did you test it ?

Re: [j-nsp] SRX PPPoE experience and scaling values.

I think that is not possible until now to use SRX as a BRAS element, only MX family. You could use MX5 with SM license for PPPoE users. Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 8112-5394 JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE giuli...@wztech.com.br http://www.wztech.com.br/ WZTE

Re: [j-nsp] VLAN's on EX4300 with 13.2X50-D15.3

I think the following link can answer it for you: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/task/configuration/getting-started-els.html Enhanced Layer 2 Software EX4300 switches 13.2X50-D10 EX9200 switches 12.3R2 QFX3500 switches 13.2X50-D15 QFX3600 switches 13.2X50-D15 QFX5

[j-nsp] MX960 - Release 12.3R4

​People, Does anyone used JUNOS 12.3R4 on MX960 gear ? Is this a stable release ? Could you please send some feedback about it ? We have a recommendation of using it but we need to know if is stable or not in production environment ... considering BGP and MPLS. Thanks a lot, Giuliano

Re: [j-nsp] EX8200 EoS / EoL ?

Much better to spend more $$$ in 9200 because it scales to 40G and 100G and because it uses a king if TRIO ASIC (other name and limited FIB/RIB only) ... and it is prepared to SDN ... integrated to QFX5100 ... so on ... Giuliano Cardozo Medalha Systems Engineer +55 (17) 3011-3811 +55 (17) 8112-5394

Re: [j-nsp] AFL license for EX8200 VirtualChassis

Robert, We did a bad experience buying only EX-XRE200-AFL. After the installation and after a commit ... the system continues to ask the EX8208 licenses showing warning messages at console. We bought the licenses and we need to install it by hand using shell ... The JUNOS version was 12.3R3.

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 Route table Size

Luca, The information we have he is: ~4M RIB - (1 BGP session test only) ~1M FIB We have some cases here with 6 full routing tables from 6 different carriers Other cases include more than 60 sessions with 4 routes each. The number of sessions itself can change the numbers too. Att, Giuliano

Re: [j-nsp] EX8208 - Virtual Chassis with AFL License

ate the entire BGP configuration, does your problem get solved > ? > > Thanks > > On Friday, 6 September 2013, Giuliano Medalha wrote: >> >> People, >> >> We have a virtual chassis environment using: >> >> 2 x XRE200 (routing engines) >> 2 x EX8208 (

[j-nsp] EX8208 - Virtual Chassis with AFL License

People, We have a virtual chassis environment using: 2 x XRE200 (routing engines) 2 x EX8208 (linecards) We have bought AFL license for XRE200 boxes, following the JUNIPER recommendation for this environment: You do not need additional license keys for Virtual Chassis member switches that are i

[j-nsp] L2Circuit VLAN-CCC EX4550

People, We have an issue when implementing vlan-CCC in JUNIPER EX4550 switches. When we put the port like the following mode: set interfaces xe-0/0/10 encapsulation vlan-ccc set interfaces xe-0/0/10 vlan-tagging set interfaces xe-0/0/10 unit 600 vlan-id 600 When we close L2Circuit with non-JUNI

Re: [j-nsp] Netconf for VCP - EX4550

ose. > > What about getting the pps and bps from the show interface queue vcp-x/y/z > ? > > Thanks > > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Giuliano Medalha wrote: > >> People, >> >> We are doing a custom management system for VCP interfaces monitoring >> using

[j-nsp] EX8208 Virtual Chassis Protection

People, Someone on the list have implemented virtual chassis using EX8208 before ? We are looking for some sample of configuration related to a firewall filter (Ex. PROTECT-RE) for EX8208 in a Virtual Chassis Environment ? Is it possible to use the same loopback address ? It will protect the ex

[j-nsp] Netconf for VCP - EX4550

People, We are doing a custom management system for VCP interfaces monitoring using NETCONF in JUNOS. The following stats are the only one reported to us: T2 3966099 3985901 T1 3966000 3985850 How is possible to calculate the input rate and the ouput rate ? The MTU for the interface is 1514.

[j-nsp] JUNOS CLI

People, When you start using configuration mode on JUNOS it shows the following output: user@ROUTER# set ? Possible completions: > access Network access configuration > access-profile Access profile for this instance > accounting-options Accounting data configuration > appli

[j-nsp] RIB and FIB - Memory for MX with LR

People, Thinking about configuring 2 Logical Systems in a MX480 box with RE1800X4, how can we provide control for memory allocation ? The box has the following configuration: 2 x RE1800X4-16GB 1 x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B 2 x SCBE-MX Is it possible to control the RIB and the FIB size using JUNOS f

[j-nsp] SRX550 Mode Packet Based for BGP Full Routing

People, Has anyone used the SRX550 in packet based mode for border router with BGP ? Considering the datasheet it only supports 712k BGP routes. I would like to know if this data is the amount of RIB or the converged routes. Is it possible to install 2 full routing using this box ? Thanks a l

[j-nsp] RPM Probes with Event Options

Hi All, We need to create a test condition to integrate JUNIPER with a PeerAPP proxy appliance. The server has 4 giga interfaces (four IP blocks /30) and we need to test them (using rpm ping probes) to generate the conditions for a event-options script. Is there some way to generate an event-opt

[j-nsp] EX4550 MPLS CCC

Hello, Good evening, We bought some JUNIPER EX4550 and put in a simple topology and simple configuration, trying to use MPLS CCC togheter with tagged Vlans (ethernet switching). We come with JUNIPER and they said not to be possible in this case, use two encapsulation types on the same interface (l

[j-nsp] Switch Log Message

Hi, Does anyone has seen this type of log before (EX2200 switches ?) Mar 23 03:01:02.204 SW-CORE /kernel: tcp_timer_keep: Dropping socket connection due to keepalive timer expiration Do you think is something critical ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano ___ j

[j-nsp] CoS Configuration

Hi, Does anyone has some experience implementing CoS using Radius for MX Series with PPPoE License ? We are looking for a specific solution that: - Can allocate bandwidth of 1 Mbps for a subscriber user (PPPoE dynamic interface) for the first 1MB. - After the first 1MB we will need to redu

[j-nsp] Q-in-Q of Untagged Frames Transport

People, Is it possible to transport untagged ethernet frames using Q-in-Q in EX2200 switches ? The client port is ever untagged ... but we would like to transport untagged frames, like a direct computer frames from one side to other side (access client port) Is it possible to do it using EX2200

[j-nsp] New MX Product Family - Is it true ?

Hello, Does anyone knows something about the new MX family ? I have been read on this list about the new products to replace MX80, MX5, etc. Is it true ? Juniper will release the new family this year ? Something new ? More RE CPU ? More RE memory ? More PFE performance ? Thanks a lot, Giu

Re: [j-nsp] Lab gear to mimic MX80?

Hi Saku, Considering the previous discussion ... do you know the correct capacity of ACX series routers ? Juniper said that it will support 7000 MAC Address and 60 Gbps with 35 Mpps. How is it possible without TRIO ? Is it asic based router for MPLS ? ACX1100 has a very good price and it has a

[j-nsp] MX5 BGP Problems (BGP and/or IPFX)

People, We have read the last messages of this list related to problems with MX80 routers. We have twi open cases with J-TAC for 2 different routers. - One of the MX5 routers has the same problem reported on this list: is takes too slow to start forwarding packets. (only 3 full routing table a

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS version for MX40?

we are using here 11.4R6.6 and it was a good choice. WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. Copyright © 2012 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain conf

[j-nsp] SFP+ Cooper Option (not DAC)

People, Is there any option to use together with EX Series Switches with SFP+ using cooper CAT6 cable ? Or the only cooper option will be the DAC cable ? Do you know any available option for SFP+ with RJ45 port for 10Gig ? Juniper accepts it ? It works ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano __

Re: [j-nsp] J-Flow Configuration on MX5

A friend use the following config for 1:1 inline j-flow IPFIX set chassis tfeb slot 0 sampling-instance ifix set interfaces ge-1/1/0 unit 0 family inet sampling input set interfaces ge-1/1/0 unit 0 family inet sampling output set forwarding-options sampling instance ifix input rate 1 set services

Re: [j-nsp] MX5 with bras?

og: www.network-ceo.net > > The Experts Who The Experts Call > Juniper - Cisco – IBM - Brocade - Cloud > - > Check out our Juniper promotion website for Oct/Nov! eintellego.mx > Free Apple products during this promotion!!! > > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:29

Re: [j-nsp] MX5 with bras?

How can we get the X27 code ? We need to ask to J-TAC ? WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS. Copyright © 2012 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved. The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confide

Re: [j-nsp] R: Routing Instance BGP Full Routing High Memory persists

12 at 9:09 AM, Riccardo S wrote: > >> With m7 the only useful action solving the issue was reboot... >> >> sent with Android >> >> Giuliano Medalha ha scritto: >> >> >People, >> > >> >We are doing some BGP tests using routing-insta

[j-nsp] SRX3600 - Session Logs

People, Does anyone could set log information about sessions using SRX36xx boxes ? Could you please send this information for me ? We have tried to use the following syslog config: user@host# *set system syslog file traffic-log any any* user@host# *set system syslog file traffic-log match "RT_F

[j-nsp] Routing Instance BGP Full Routing High Memory persists

People, We are doing some BGP tests using routing-instances on MX5-T-DC routers. We have created a routing-instance to receive 3 full routing inet.0 tables. The master routing has 3 majors full routing tables too. Before the tests we check the RE percentage of using memory ... using: Router> s

Re: [j-nsp] JUNIPER AXC1100

Thanks a lot for your answer. As we can see ... version 12.2 is supporting policing (inside firewall filters) per logical unit. QoS Firewall filters (access control list -ACLs) - family inet

[j-nsp] JUNIPER AXC1100

People, Does anyone has some experience using ACX1100 or any other router from ACX family ? We are looking for an aggregate router for our network and we are thinking to use ACX only with gig ports. There is some specific questions about this router: - Is it possible to configure policers (in a

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Virtual chassis

You can use the following too: set virtual-chassis preprovisioned set virtual-chassis no-split-detection set virtual-chassis member 0 role routing-engine set virtual-chassis member 0 serial-number [SERIAL-1] set virtual-chassis member 1 role routing-engine set virtual-chassis member 1 serial-numbe

Re: [j-nsp] How reliable is EX multichassis? 3300 and 8200 switches

will support virtual chassis without JCS. Att, Giuliano On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Robert Hass wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Giuliano Medalha > wrote: > > Considering the MX family (240, 480 and 960 with TRIO 3D) and the new > MX-L > > Hi > What

Re: [j-nsp] How reliable is EX multichassis? 3300 and 8200 switches

site > with two 40 port 10gig cards each, no more 8XS cards. I would like to > spread the interconnections across two cards to protect against a module > failure. > > Morgan > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Giuliano Medalha > wrote: > >> Morgan, >> &g

Re: [j-nsp] How reliable is EX multichassis? 3300 and 8200 switches

Morgan, We have some cases running EX8200 as a Virtual Chassis, but you will need the XRE200 External Routing Engines: http://www.juniper.net/in/en/products-services/switching/ex-series/options/xre200/ Don't forget that you will need the 8 ports (10 gig) for chassis inter x connections - EX8200

[j-nsp] Switch EX4200 doing broadcast for all ports from multicast traffic

People, We have 4 x EX4200 (4200-24F and EX4200-48T) running 12.1R3.5 code connected using Virtual Chassis configuration. The configuration is very simple with 2 vlans. VLAN - LAN vlan id 10. The problem is related to traffic monitor software (wireshark for instance). When we connect wireshark

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Broadband Model suggestion?

On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:17:15 AM Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > Disadvantage of both PPPoE and VLAN-per-customer: no > effective multicast (unless you run that in a seperate > second shared-VLAN). In our consideration, Multicast would have been a separate shared VLAN, as it then allows yo

Re: [j-nsp] SRX 5800 cluster reports 100% of CPU through snmpget

maybe you can try using another junos release like 10.4r5 we are using here with no problems On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Alberto Santos wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'm facing difficult times with srx5800 and snmpget. > I have a cluster which reports it is running over 100% CPU for it's RE0,

[j-nsp] Multi-Chassis AE

People, Does anyone on list has some experience in running multichassis LAG using the following interface ? MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP This interface has some limitations like LAN-PHY only. Is it possible to configure virtual chassis with it ? After configuring virtual chassis it is possible to configu

[j-nsp] Juniper MX5 with MK - VPLS

People, We are trying to create some VPLS tunnel with MK equipments. Documentation shows that with some cisco routes it works fine. We need to finish the tunnel under a MX5 router and re-route the encapsulate traffic from the MX5 router to give some internet L3 (inet.0 access). For this we do t

Re: [j-nsp] Flow analysis question

Show route Show route forwarding-table On Sunday, April 8, 2012, Michael Smith wrote: > Hello: > > Is it possible on the MX series to look at the flow logs real time? In > Cisco, you can attach to the linecard and do a 'sho ip cache flow' that > shows you the Netflow data. I'm looking for some

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator

You need to ask him to add the following licensed to the QUOTE: S-SA-8K S-MX80-SA-FP S-MX80-SSM-FP It works fine for me. Att, Giuliano On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11, Remco Bressers wrote: > Hi list, > > We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following > featureset : >

Re: [j-nsp] bgp under routing instance.

are you using J-Series as a router ? http://juniper.cluepon.net/Enabling_packet_based_forwarding On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 00:05, ashish verma wrote: > Hi All, > > I am having trouble turning up BGP under routing-instance. Could someone > please help? > > Here are the relevant configuration of lab

[j-nsp] SFP Status and Conditions

People, Is it any possible to monitor the SPF status of an EX switch ? Is there some commands to see SFP or XFP or SFP+ status ? - power - model - temperature Some SFP supports DD for verification. Juniper supports it ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano ___ j

Re: [j-nsp] mitigating dos attack on Juniper M10i

You can create a RE filter to protect the control plane (apply it input in lo0): filter protect-RE { term bgp { from { protocol tcp; port bgp; } then { policer bgp-policer;

Re: [j-nsp] M7i

You can take more advantage with MX80-5 new promotional bunde. It supports 20 x SFP Interfaces, came with ADC-R License , TRIO3D chipset and 2GB DRAM (4m rib routes). It came with 4 x XFP slots (blocked by software license) On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 13:33, Doug Hanks wrote: > I would suggest th

[j-nsp] Juniper Subscriber Management

People, Does anyone on list is using JUNIPER Networks MX Series solution as a Subscriber Management Solution ? Can please contact-me in private ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/m