ary 2010 04:52:30 pm Ioan Branet wrote:
>
> > I used a 6500 instead of 7600 as PE1 and connect this
> > 6500 to Juniper MX (PE1-CE1 link) and it works,it seems
> > that the problem is with this Cisco 7600,maybe a bug or
> > something like this.
>
> You probably me
Hello,
I used a 6500 instead of 7600 as PE1 and connect this 6500 to Juniper MX
(PE1-CE1 link) and it works,it seems that the problem is with this Cisco
7600,maybe a bug or something like this.
Thank you for your help,
John
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Ioan Branet wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> 1. When you ping from Juniper CE do you know where ping is getting dropped?
> If you do monitor traffic on Juniper xe-3/1/0 do you see ping going out?
>
> 2. Can you please remove accounting and sampling on xe interface and then
> try?
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:44 A
Hello group,
I have the following setup
CE1(Juniper MX480) xe3/1/0.999 -Te7/3.999 PE1(Cisco 7600)PE2(Cisco
7600)Gi2/2.999---SVI 999(7600)CE2
I configured EOMPLS between PE1 and PE2 and if I use Cisco 7600 as CE1 I am
able to ping between CE1 and CE2
If I use MX480 Juniper I cant ping betw
net/techpubs/software/junos/junos92/swconfig-policy/example-redistributing-ospf-routes-into-bgp.html
>
> Since they aren't advertised, it makes me think that BGP doesn't know to
> advertise those routes.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> --
> *From:*
Fax > 206.728.1500
> Email > ava...@hq.speakeasy.net * Web > www.speakeasy.net
>
> Voice * Data * Managed Services
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ioan
Hello Group,
I have the following setup:
R3(PE VRF X)R1---R2(PE VRF X)R5 (CE )
On R2 on the interface connecting to R5 i have a virtual-router instance and
run OSPF with R5 in this instance and also a VRF X instance.
I use rib-groups to leak the prefixes from virtual-router instance t
It will give you a hint on any mismatch that can prevent the
> connection from being Up.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Ioan Branet
> wrote:
> > Hello group,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am traying to configrure a L2circuit betw
Hello group,
I am traying to configrure a L2circuit between an MX and a 7600 as PEs
(ethernet-vlan mode).
The problem is that the ping between CE1 and CE2 works only when I use the
same vlan-ids on both PEs.
If I use different vlans ID , on Juniper side CE wont learn ARP .
I use ccc encapsula
Hello group,
I want to mark the packets on Juniper MX240 and to check on Cisco router how
the packets are received marked.
I use classifier and rewrite rules for this.
My understanding is that we can use classifier to mark packets on input
interface and rewrite-rule to remark packets as they lea
physical wiring problems on
fiber and I can't test the solution for the moment and i wonder if is is
interoperable.
Thank you,
Ionut
--
Ioan Branet
CCIE #23474 R&S
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.ne
}Hello,
Does anyone configured filter based forwarding using a filter on which you
match traffic using source-class ussage ?
I want to forward traffic matching particular source-class to a specific
routing-instance.
It seems that these 2 features do not work toghether according to:
net1.generatedAddressOffset = "10"
ethernet2.present = "TRUE"
ethernet2.connectionType = "custom"
ethernet2.vnet = "/dev/vmnet2"
ethernet2.virtualDev = "e1000"
ethernet2.addressType = "generated"
ethernet2.pciSlotNumber = "35"
etherne
0 0:c:29:bb:f:be ucst 547 4 em2.0
defaultperm 0 rjct 531 1
r...@r1>
Thank you,
--
Ioan Branet
CCIE #23474 R&S
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
14 matches
Mail list logo
