I have it deployed in "enterprise-style" deployment (dual-stack for
the office users), on a SRX240-H cluster running 10.2R3. It works just
as expected so far.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 21:39, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hmmm.. interesting - I thought I had reviewed 10.2 for this support... will
> dig dee
10 Port scan! source-address 12 172.16.10.23
> source-port 5 54326 destination-address 13 172.16.10.254 destination-port 3
> 712 source-zone-name 3 LAN interface-name 7 vlan.10 action 4 drop
>
>
>
> On 08/09/2010, at 5:41 AM, Jérôme Fleury wrote:
>
>> Hi Fahad,
>>
&g
Hi Fahad,
that's a good question. I've been searching for a long time, and could
not find neither... I'm not even able to see them on my STRM, which
defeats completely the purpose of this appliance.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:02, Fahad Khan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Can some body tell me that how ca
Hi Laurent,
and what is the issue exactly ?
You don't strictly need a ssh key on the switch for it to work.
Also please note that this command can take a long time to achieve if
your resolver on the switch does not work. The switch tries to resolve
each IP address on the list.
Regards,
Jerome.
Hi there,
I think I'm experiencing the same issue here:
SRX 3600 in cluster mode, running 10.1R2.8
1 SPC / 1 NPC per chassis
VPN in policy based mode with a remote CheckPoint
I can clearly see packet loss in the way SRX -> Checkpoint, resulting
in very poor performances in the tunnel
We'll try
Hi,
does anyone know where I can the Juniper price list ? Their website
speaks about "published" price list, but it seems to be nowhere
downloadable.
Thanks for help.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailm
It's printed in the limitations section of the release notes actually.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:37, OBrien, Will wrote:
> We ran into an interesting case where we can't terminate tunnel interfaces
> on virtual routers on a SRX - only the primary. Has anyone else run into
> this? It's pretty cr
7 matches
Mail list logo
