Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 : Ping problem

Can you provide the following outputs from both switches? - show interfaces terse- show vlans- show route -Regards, Jared On Monday, November 28, 2016 12:55 PM, Deloin via juniper-nsp wrote: Hello, I have 2 EX4600 switchs. They have the same symetric configurations: SWITCH EX460

Re: [j-nsp] PVLAN with ELS?

Hey Per, 13.2, which is ELS-based, *does* have a reduced feature set when compared to 12.x and PVLAN *is* one of those missing features. As I understand it this is a temporary thing and the features will be added back in as they're tested, etc. Here's the feature list for QFX for 13.2: http://

Re: [j-nsp] Access Rejected

Are you using NAT? Original message Subject: [j-nsp] Access Rejected From: Mohammad Khalil To: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" CC: Hi all I got the below log message on one of my EX4200 switches Feb 23 16:00:10  B-AM022 login: LOGIN_PAM_AUTHENTICATION_ERROR: PAM authenticat

Re: [j-nsp] Windows NTP server for JUNOS client

Hi Abdullah, I have seen others experience issues when using a Windows server as their NTP server when that server does not have an external time source. Does your Windows NTP server have an upstream time source? If not, you could try to link it with one to see if that fixes the issue. If not,

Re: [j-nsp] QinQ

Hi Mohammad, Can you share your current configurations and the topology details? Also, please explain how you're testing this and what you're seeing or not seeing. -Thanks, Jared From: Mohammad Khalil To: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Sent: Tuesday, June

Re: [j-nsp] Cannot auto-configure the router interface IPv6 address?

Hi Huan, This is not currently possible on a Junos OS router. You must assign the address or at least the prefix portion of the address and then use EUI-64 to auto-generate the interface ID portion, which is based on the interface's hardware address. Hope this helps. Jared

Re: [j-nsp] IS-IS MT transition mode?

After digging into this a bit more, I believe Jeff is right w/r/t Junos OS not supporting the transition feature. From: Jeff Aitken To: Michael Sinatra Cc: Jared Gull ; "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 6:17 AM Subje

Re: [j-nsp] IS-IS MT transition mode?

Hi Michael, You can enable an IPv6 unicast topology in addition to the default IPv4 and IPv6 topology for IS-IS using the 'topologies' keyword: [edit] user@router# set protocols isis topologies ? Possible completions: + apply-groups Groups from which to inherit configuration data + apply

Re: [j-nsp] console switch to access juniper devices

Sachin, I believe you have several options available and haven't heard of many (if any) compatibility issues. We currently use Cyclades in our environment but have also used Cisco in the past. Jared From: Sachin Rai To: Juniper nsp Sent: Friday, March 30,

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP-SP latest dumps

I'm with Graham. Sack up and have some integrity, learn the material, and take the test pass or fail. From: Xu Hu To: Graham Brown Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 3:08 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP-SP latest dumps Ok, boss, no

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP help needed

Hi Vlad, Here's an example: Router 1: ge-0/0/4 { vlan-tagging; unit 200 { vlan-id 200; family inet { address 172.20.200.2/24 { vrrp-group 10 { virtual-address 172.20.200.1;

Re: [j-nsp] Required books/resources to pass Juniper exams

Hi Gokhan, Much of the study material needed for both of these certification tests is available free of charge through the fast track on Juniper's web site. The exception would be some MX-specific switching topics as well as some VPLS material. In addition to supporting CBTs and study guides yo

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS-ENT - Software to prepare for exam

Hi David, I'm not aware of any Boson or boson-like tests out there but the fast track portal does offer free routing and switching study guides and assessment tests. These study guides and assessment tests are great resources for this test. If you don't have it, the URL for the fast track is be

[j-nsp] (no subject)

http://eastcoastgreenenergy.com.au/to.html ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 virtual-chassis and vme access

Yes, those are mutually exclusive. When the vme interface is used it functions as a Layer 3 VLAN interface and the various me0 interfaces are Layer 2 switch ports. The vme and all me0 ports are associated with the mgmt VLAN. I'd recommend removing the groups config and stick with the vme approac

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS downloads busted

The download site is working fine for me. --- On Wed, 6/3/09, Tommy Perniciaro wrote: > From: Tommy Perniciaro > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS downloads busted > To: "Richard A Steenbergen" , > "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net" > Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 11:47 AM > Now the download site is >

Re: [j-nsp] EX Series Firewall Filter Configuration

figuration > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: "Juniper-Nsp" > Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 11:23 AM > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jared Gull > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stefan, > > > > Processing continues even if there is match and an &g

Re: [j-nsp] EX Series Firewall Filter Configuration

Stefan, Processing continues even if there is match and an accept/reject on a preceeding filter. Jared --- On Tue, 9/16/08, Stefan Fouant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stefan Fouant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] EX Series Firewall Filter Configuration > To: "Juniper-Nsp" > Date

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP Ifindex persist

Farhan, That's not typical. Generally speaking the snmp ifindex information remains the same between reboots and upgrades. I have seen rare situations where they have changed (e.g. upgrading between certain versions) but those situations are the exception and not the norm. Jared --- Farhan Jaffer

Re: [j-nsp] jcrypto problem

Beny, Try upgrading with a domestic jinstall image. If you haven't already, you should probably backup the config before hand. Jared --- Beny Dwi Setyawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > Does anyone have experienced when tried to install > jcrypto? > > I got this error log on m

Re: [j-nsp] Image compatibility

All M and T-series platforms use the same install images. --- Monika M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can a single image be used for both M10 and M20 > routers? > > TIA > Monika > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.

Re: [j-nsp] IPSec Tunnel across Internet

Hello, You will need an AS-PIC or ES-PIC with your M20 in order to form an IPSec tunnel (both sides will require one of these PICs). You can form GRE or IPIP tunnels with the tunnel PIC but not IPSec. -Regards, Jared --- Juniper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new at Juniper world, I

Re: [j-nsp] Filter-Based Forwarding issue

Could you provide the configuration snippets for the routing-options, routing-instances, and a 'show route summary' output. --- Gniewko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello There, > > I've exprienced weird behaviour of FBF - it doesn't > work at all :). > Suppose there is a very simple filter: >

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance

Giuliano, You can have 8 links per bundle. If you want to bundle all 12 links you'll need to configure two separate bundles. Hths Jared --- "Giuliano (UOL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > Cisco routers has a limit of 6 Serial Interfaces, > when used with MLPPP > load balance. >

Re: [j-nsp] Routing engine diagnostics

Raniery, This should not affect your routing/forwarding operations, however it should probably be done during a maintenance window just to be safe. Jared --- Raniery Pontes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > after a power failure on a M40e, I´d like to run > some diagnost

Re: [j-nsp] MLPPP link drop brings bundle down

Chris, Do you have a non-default minimum-links value configured? By default it is set to 1 so you should only require 1 member link to be active to maintain the bundle. Jared --- Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With a cisco 1600/2600 router, mlppp config and two > T1 WICs I can dro

Re: [j-nsp] Vpls-ldp signaling

Jake is right in that BGP is still required (LDP will not replaced BGP - sorry I missed that). You should be able to use LDP or RSVP for the VPN signaling. BGP will still be required for exchanging the vpn route information. --- "Bourgeois, Jacob (Jake)** CTR **" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Th

Re: [j-nsp] Vpls-ldp signaling

All, Apparently I took my stupid pills this past week. LDP is not supported yet for VPLS ;P The docs I was looking at are general VPN related docs (not VPLS specific). Sorry for confusing everyone (I'll shut up now). Jared --- Jared Gull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jake is rig

Re: [j-nsp] Vpls-ldp signaling

Hello, You need to configure the LDP protocol and add all participating (core-facing) interfaces. These will be the PE to PE and PE to P interfaces. You need to make sure that family mpls is also enabled on these same interfaces on all participating routers. Other than that it's just a matter of l

Re: [j-nsp] bandwidth limiting on 4 port Fast Ethernet

unit 0 { family inet { filter { input test; <<< filter/policer applied } address 10.1.0.1/16; } } The other format may not work depending on your version of software. Hths.. Jared Gull --- Gökhan Gümüº <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all

Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN config sample!

Mounir, Try the following: [edit] [EMAIL PROTECTED] run show ospf neighbor instance test Address Interface State ID Pri Dead 10.1.8.53fe-1/0/0.0 Full 10.1.8.5312831 If you do not follow the 'show ospf neighbor' comman

Re: [j-nsp] Problem with PB-4GE-SX

ion information: > Negotiation status: No-autonegotiation > Link partner: > Link partner: Unknown, Flow control: None, > Remote fault: Ok > Local resolution: > Flow control: Symmetric, Remote fault: Link > ok > Packet Forwarding Engine configuration: &

Re: [j-nsp] Problem with PB-4GE-SX

Oliver, Are you seeing drops and/or errors on this interface? Please provide a 'show interface extensive' for the interface you're working with. Also, how is this being tested (i.e. are you using a traffic generator)? -Regards, Jared --- "O. Notka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > we have

Re: [j-nsp] [Fwd: How to upgrade from Junos4.01]

Juan, A couple of things jump out at me. First the size of your internal flash is quite small and that's what's going to be used (not the HDD) for the upgrade process. Second you're trying to upgrade from 4.x to 7.x using a jbundle (this will not work). You should use a jinstall image when going b

Re: [j-nsp] OC12 PIC

-- > From: Erdem Sener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:20 AM > To: Josh L. Richesin > Cc: Jared Gull; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] OC12 PIC > > will something like " show interfaces terse | match > -0/1/ | match down&q

Re: [j-nsp] OC12 PIC

Josh, What is the current state of the interface (i.e. show interface so-x/y/z extensive)? If the PIC is operational and the circuit is up it should be green. -Regards, Jared --- "Josh L. Richesin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I have a Juniper m10i and I just notcied that the > status

Re: [j-nsp] uRPF

Manu, See the link below: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos81/swconfig81-network-interfaces/html/interfaces-family-config29.html Hths... Jared --- Manu Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Until now, i am using Firewall Filter in order to > control source-ip @ from > customers.