Just to verify, the /28 isn't a sub-set of the /27 is it? Junipers tend not to
like setting up multiple netblocks(like a /28 that's inside a
previously-configured /27) within the same interface, especially if you attempt
to set them both using the same virtual-address.
Network Engineer, JNCIS
4-642-4075 (cell)
> jbrash...@hq.speakeasy.net
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eu...@imacandi.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:48 AM
To: Jonathan Brashear
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] M7i compact flash card
Jonathan Bras
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-642-4075 (cell)
> jbrash...@hq.speakeasy.net
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brendan Mannella
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:48 AM
To
-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of sth...@nethelp.no
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:43 AM
To: Jonathan Brashear
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] M7i compact flash card
> With the caveat that Juniper doesn't support CFs you
With the caveat that Juniper doesn't support CFs you buy elsewhere, I believe
the 'Juniper' CFs are re-branded Sandisk CFs.
Network Engineer, JNCIS-M
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-642-4075 (cell)
> jbrash...@hq.speakeasy.net
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp
My JNCIA-M is nearing expiration so I've got to get back on the saddle to
re-up. I'm curious how much the test has changed in the last 2 years. I know
the book I have was at a premium for awhile, have they updated the test much in
the last 2 years?
Network Engineer
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 2
I'll agree with this, though in my experience I've gotten to that
2nd/3rd level much more quickly with Juniper than I ever did with Cisco.
Maybe I've just been lucky or I've been with companies whose contracts
were big enough that I got better than average treatment, but on average
I get the answer
In my experience, Juniper doesn't allow the same subnet to be assigned
to multiple _physical_ interfaces.
Network Engineer
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-642-4075 (cell)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
I've heard many good things about Cariden's products, but haven't used
it myself.
http://www.cariden.com/products/
Network Engineer
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-642-4075 (cell)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
From: E.S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:13 PM
To: Jonathan Brashear
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Bulk config migration between interfaces?
Hey Jonathan,
You actually have two options:
1. rename the interface, e.g:
rename interfaces ge-0/0
I have a facility(3, actually) I'm upgrading and part of this upgrade
involves moving a circuit from one PIC on a M20 FPC to a new PIC on the
same FPC. I have a few dozen VLANs that will be migrated as well.
Obviously I could do this one by one, but I was curious if anyone knew a
way within JunOS
l Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Brashear
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:01 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] JunOS Bug list?
I'd like to keep up with the JunOS bugs that are discovered. Is there a
list similar to
I'd like to keep up with the JunOS bugs that are discovered. Is there a
list similar to this one where Juniper bug releases(both hardware &
software, I guess) are released and/or discussed? Thanks in advance.
Network Engineer
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-642-4075 (cell)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
The context: We have a pair of M7s that are the main connection to the
outside world for our data center. The DC is segmented into 2
spaces(one space being brand new), each space having a connection to a
1xgig-e PIC on the M7s. We have a shared firewall in the old space(I'll
call it PIC 1), but a
Seconded. Depending on what type of Juniper you're using, VRRP issues
can heavily tax a router and cause it to drop bgp with other routers if
enough problems pop up. Dropping the fast-interval time will only
hasten these problems. It's your call, but imo it's a
high-risk/low-reward situation tun
Show | compare
Network Engineer
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-868-8567 (cell)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne
Lansdowne
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:06 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.ne
You could also try "request chassis pic fpc-slot 1 pic-slot 3 online" as
well I believe.
Network Engineer
> 214-981-1954 (office)
> 214-868-8567 (cell)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.speakeasy.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Bal
http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200012.pdf
I've been reading up on this solution and it seems very plausible &
scalable, but we haven't tried to set it up in our lab yet. Has anyone
deployed this service, and if so what's your feedback on it?
Network Engineer, Managed Se
I'm considering picking up O'Reilly's 'JunOS Cookbook', but figured this
is as good a place as any to ask for reviews. :) Has anyone bought this
and used it?
For those who may not be familiar with the title:
http://www.amazon.com/JUNOS-Cookbook-Cookbooks-OReilly-Garrett/dp/059610
0140/ref=pd_bbs_
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here(it wouldn't be the first
time), but telnet is a tcp application and thus has to communicate in
both directions regardless of the port involved. If you're blocking tcp
on any non-telnet port(including port 80), I would imagine it's being
discarded on the w
20 matches
Mail list logo
