Re: [j-nsp] Packet Size Distribution Statistics

2010-08-24 Thread KJ
dissemination is strictly prohibited and in any > such event please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy > this e-mail and any accompanying documents and any copies. > > > > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- //kj ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Tunnel hardware redundancy

2010-08-17 Thread KJ
Hi Chris Maybe you could tie the tunnels to redundant services interfaces. (RSP's) http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-services/configuring-as-or-multiservices-pic-redundancy.html Cheers //KJ On 17 August 2010 01:12, Chris Evans wrote: > Looking for in

Re: [j-nsp] AS-path regexp clue needed

2010-07-29 Thread KJ
Take a look here: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos74/swconfig74-policy/html/policy-extend-match-config3.html On 29 July 2010 14:18, Daniel Verlouw wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [j-nsp] Force ports with only RX connected to UP

2010-07-07 Thread KJ
Hi John Just a thought, Physical interfaces operate in bidirectional mode by default, both transmitting and receiving traffic. meaning that the bidirectional nature of ports requires a port to receive data from the same port that it transmits data to. You can configure unidirectional on 10G por

Re: [j-nsp] Force ports with only RX connected to UP

2010-07-07 Thread KJ
Hi John Just a thought, Physical interfaces operate in bidirectional mode by default, both transmitting and receiving traffic. meaning that the bidirectional nature of ports requires a port to receive data from the same port that it transmits data to. You can configure unidirectional on 10G por