[j-nsp] Juniper MPC2E-3D-NG-R-B vs MPC2E-3D-R-B

Hi list, Can anyone tell me the differences in scaling or features of the MPC2E-3D-NG-R-B vs MPC2E-3D-R-B. I know the NG requires an SBCE2. Thanks, Kevin ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listin

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS equivalent of Cisco show interface idprom

00 00 00 - 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 > 0xd0: 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 - 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 > 0xe0: 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 - 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 > 0xf0: 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 - 00 00 00 00 . 00 00 00 00 > > HCFPC0(r21.labxtx01.us.bb vty)# > > O

[j-nsp] JunOS equivalent of Cisco show interface idprom

I’m trying to find an equivalent JunOS command (T Series) to dump the idprom info from a XENPAK adapter. I have found “show chassis hardware extensive” and from the PFE “show ideeprom scan verbose” but those don’t appear to grab the info from the XENPAK itself. If anyone has any suggestions pl

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 Power Options

Hi Colton, Do you already have the MX960 or a similarly configured one? If so, the easiest thing to do is fire it up and issue “show chassis power”. It will show you how much power is required for the running configuration and you can then do the math to size your circuits accordingly. In a

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 with 3 RE's?

So what are any bandwidth limitations of an all DPCE-R system with original SCB? Thanks, Kevin > On Jan 15, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Christopher E. Brown > wrote: > > > The MPC2-Q is an advanced per unit queueing card and has QX, it also > runs against the lower/original fabric rate. > > The 16XG

Re: [j-nsp] DPCE-R-4XGE FIFO errors

As a follow-up to my own question; I suppose I should ask if it would be expected for the MX240 with the original SBC and DPCE-R should be able to do "wire rate" on a port at 68 byte packets at layer3? On 10/28/2015 12:31 PM, Kevin Wormington wrote: Hi, I was playing around with

[j-nsp] DPCE-R-4XGE FIFO errors

Hi, I was playing around with a 10G test set and sending 68 byte packets at layer3 to a 10G port on a DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP and I'm seeing receive FIFO errors incrementing and packet loss above about 7.1gb. The docs says if that counter is ever non-zero it could be a bad PIC but I've tried two dif

Re: [j-nsp] Breaking an EX cluster?

PM, Scott Granados wrote: Ah very interesting. I didn’t think of that. The switches all have what ever they were shipped and manufactured with. 13.2X51 but not sure if the sub version matches. I will give that a look and match them up if they aren’t a matching set. On Aug 17, 2015, at 2:29

Re: [j-nsp] Breaking an EX cluster?

Are these units all running the same version of JunOS? If the lab units have a new version or vice-versa it could spell trouble. I ran into a similar issue with 4300's and zeroing them and upgrading JunOS to the latest recommend version with no VCP modules/cables installed and then forming th

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

2 tags Otherwise have you checked the mac-address-table of routing instance VPLS1 if you are at least learning the mac addresses of incoming frames? adam -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Wormington Sent: 08 March 2

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

Chris, Thanks, I just tried it and this works...guess I was making it more difficult that it needed to be. I haven't tested spanning tree through it or other layer2 control protocols but you are thinking they should pass through just like and l2vpn? Thanks again, Kevin On 03/08/2015 05:52

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

oedler wrote: Probably is your encapsulation on ingress port. -- Eduardo Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington mailto:kw...@sofnet.com>> escreveu: Hi, On MX (Specifically MX80 w/12.3R9.4) is it possible to pass all c

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

Shouldn't the vpls connection be down with MM instead of LD/RD if MTU were an issue? On 03/08/2015 10:25 AM, Linder, Todd wrote: Possible MTU issue? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Kevin Wormington wrote: Eduardo, I have tried the following for encapsulation o

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

; } } } } } On 03/08/2015 01:37 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote: Probably is your encapsulation on ingress port. -- Eduardo Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington mailto:kw...@sofnet.com>> escreveu: Hi, On MX (Specifically MX80 w/12.3R9.4) is it possible to pass all customer CE t

[j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

Hi, On MX (Specifically MX80 w/12.3R9.4) is it possible to pass all customer CE traffic whether it's tagged or untagged from a port on PE1 to a port on PE2 using VPLS (BGP/RSVP)? I have a lab system using logical systems with ports looped back and I can get untagged traffic to work fine, but

Re: [j-nsp] Activating FPC's on an EX8208

en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/specifications/calculating-power-requirements-mx480.html On 03/05/2015 12:48 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: On 4/Mar/15 18:21, Kevin Wormington wrote: I don't have any experience the the large EXs, but is there a chance you don't have enough power

Re: [j-nsp] Activating FPC's on an EX8208

I don't have any experience the the large EXs, but is there a chance you don't have enough power to the chassis to bring the line cards online? I know the larger MXs require a certain number of supplies and IIRC certain supplies power certain slots. So if you just have one supply plugged into

[j-nsp] SSD on RE-A-2000

Hi, I was wondering if anyone on the list has had success replacing the hard disk on the RE-A-2000-4096 with a small SSD? If so, any tips or gotchas? Thanks, Kevin ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mai

[j-nsp] MX80 TPIDs

Hi, Would anyone care to share a config example that would allow outer TPID translation between two different ports on an MX80? The scenario is receiving q-in-q traffic from a carrier that only supports a TPID of 0x9100 on the outer tag (inner tag is still 0x8100). Our internal network is a

Re: [j-nsp] loop detection on EX4200

Could you not use MSTP or VSTP instead of RSTP? On 04/21/2014 11:03 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Chuck Anderson wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:20:42PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: Dave Bell wrote: You could try enabling bpdu-block-on-edge. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/topi

[j-nsp] SRX MPLSoGREoIPSec

Hi, I am interested in hearing from any on the list that are doing MPLS over GRE over IPSec on the SRX platform with l2circuit/ccc. I have done this in the lab with SRX100Hs and it works quite well even fragmenting to carry the simulated customer MTU of 1500. The performance of these units

Re: [j-nsp] AC->DC

We use Eltek-Valere. Work very well and reasonably priced. On 02/26/2013 11:45 AM, Rutger Bevaart wrote: Hello list, Anybody have some good advice on AC to DC converters to power a Juniper T640 with dual input DC power supplies? I found a few vendors that do 4x50A in 1U (TDK for example) and

Re: [j-nsp] mx-class units now advertisement management interface networks in BGP

I haven't tested this but I think: term term1 { from { protocol [ direct static ]; interface fxp0.0; } then reject; } in your export policy would be a "generic" way to prevent any routes from the fxp interface from being injected into BGP. In our policies we explic

[j-nsp] MX80 MPLS config example

Hi, I'm wanting to transport a layer2 VLAN via MPLS between two MX80s (Trio based) and on PE1 the customer traffic is coming into the PE interface as tagged traffic some of which are terminated directly to layer3 as units on the MX80s interface. PE2 the traffic will be untagged toward the cu

[j-nsp] MX80 Power

Curious if anyone has used one AC and one DC power supply in an MX80? Yes, I know the docs say it's not supported but we all know how that goes. Thanks, Kevin ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/lis

[j-nsp] MX80 clksyncd CPU usage

We just received some MX80 modular systems and they came in with 11.2R1.10. I noticed right off the bat that there was continuous CPU usage of 5-7% by the clksyncd process with nothing transiting the system and just my laptop connected to the console port. Since there is no way I was going to

Re: [j-nsp] IS-IS routes not installed

em. On Feb 24, 2012, at 13:55 , Kevin Wormington wrote: Thanks to all that replied. Adding point-to-point on all the IS-IS interfaces seems to make it work in the lab anyway. Kevin On 02/24/2012 11:51 AM, sth...@nethelp.no <mailto:sth...@nethelp.no> wrote: This is a single level (level2 o

Re: [j-nsp] IS-IS routes not installed

Thanks to all that replied. Adding point-to-point on all the IS-IS interfaces seems to make it work in the lab anyway. Kevin On 02/24/2012 11:51 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: >>> This is a single level (level2 only) single area setup. As to why the >> >> if I remember my ISIS correctly, you need

[j-nsp] IS-IS routes not installed

Hi, I have a lab setup with three nodes (2 M7i and 1 EX4200) in the following topology (forgive the bad ascii art): M7i1 <--> EX \ / \ / M7i2 The links between them are all gige going through layer2 switches with a VLAN 302 t

Re: [j-nsp] Double-tagging on EX

I have never tried this in a q-in-q application, but what if you put "native-vlan-id" on the access ports...will that add the inner tag when it goes out a trunk port? Might be worth a shot if you haven't tried it. Kevin On 02/22/2012 11:44 AM, Alexander Frolkin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at

Re: [j-nsp] Mounting MX80 at an angle

I haven't done this with an MX80, but over the years we have done this with qutie a bit of equipment to keep within a telco style narrow bay arrangement. We have never had any issue with doing it. I can't imagine anything would be different for an MX80 as long as the airflow remains intact.

Re: [j-nsp] Whitebox 10Gb/s capture challenge

For something between an off-the-shelf server and a purpose-build appliance there are hardware capture cards from companies like Napatech that can get wire speed into system memory and can also do filtering in hardware to just get the packets you are interested in to system memory. On 01/12/

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

CT-JFLOW-IN-5G licenses. Power-supply cable to be ordered separately Sure looks to me like the specifications are the same too. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Kevin Wormington wrote: I'm looking at the above two MX bundles and other than ti

[j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

I'm looking at the above two MX bundles and other than timing support on the MX5 they seem to have the same specs. Is there something that I'm missing? Does anyone on the list know why one might want the MX80-5G-DC-B vs the MX5-T-DC? Thanks Kevin

[j-nsp] M7i IQ2 tpid translation or tag manipulation

Hi, I was wondering if it's possible to take in q-in-q traffic with outer tpid 0x9100 on an iq2 gige interface and be able to make a cross-connect (layer 2) to another iq2 gige interface but using tpid 0x8100 on the outer tag? Or, alternatively, strip/rewrite the 0x9100 outer tag and send it o

[j-nsp] Remove EX-4200 stack member

I'm running a production stack of 3 EX-4200s using the stacking ports on 9.6R1.3. I would like to remove the 3rd member (no ports in use or configured) which is just in line-card mode without effecting the other two. The units were all pre-provisioned. I'm curious if anyone has attempted thi

Re: [j-nsp] Need suggestions..

I think cleupon has some 3rd party modules that are known to work. Running 9.6 mine looks as follows with 128M on the CFEB: show chassis cfeb CFEB status: State Online Intake temperature 14 degrees C / 57 degrees F Exhaust temperature

Re: [j-nsp] Need suggestions..

I agree about the services. We just hang an EX4200 off of ours for more density - won't help you if you need more than 6GB of throughput though. Mark Tinka wrote: On Friday 05 February 2010 12:26:09 am TCIS List Acct wrote: We have 4 M7i's with RE-400's and 768M RAM and have never had a pro

Re: [j-nsp] Need suggestions..

Here is ours on 9.6R1.3, two full feeds, approx 500 logical interfaces inet.0: 305813 destinations, 604735 routes (305813 active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden) Routing Engine status: Temperature 19 degrees C / 66 degrees F CPU temperature 16 degrees C / 60 degrees

Re: [j-nsp] Need suggestions..

ve said we may run out of CFEB RAM first? Excuse the newbie question, but what is the CFEB RAM used for -- we have one router with one full feed and the CFEB is at 42% RAM, another with two full feeds and the CFEB is at 42% also... Kevin Wormington wrote: We also have a few M7is with RE-400s and

Re: [j-nsp] Need suggestions..

I seem to remember some discussion about how memory usage was reported changing between the 8.x and 9.x releases. ie, it would report much higher usage in newer releases but was still using basically the same amount of memory. Perhaps a change in the underlying freebsd. Brendan Mannella wrote

Re: [j-nsp] Need suggestions..

We also have a few M7is with RE-400s and 768MB RAM and don't have any problems with a thousand or so logical interfaces and 2 full bgp feeds each (only 300+k routes in FIB, and full IPV6 tables). The memory usage is at 95% but they don't swap and I think I remember seeing somewhere that the me

Re: [j-nsp] RE-400 memory upgrade

mainboard. Your could check SPEC of Intel 82443BX how much DRAM it supported. And I don't think there is any limitation in JUNOS. On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Kevin Wormington <mailto:kw...@sofnet.com>> wrote: Hi, I know the official max memory on the RE-400 is 7

[j-nsp] RE-400 memory upgrade

Hi, I know the official max memory on the RE-400 is 768MB but I was wondering if anyone has tried using 3 x 512MB modules versus the 3 x 256MB modules? I assume that it could be bios limited or JunOS limited even if the hardware accepted it. Kevin ___

[j-nsp] DHCP Relay

Hi All, I'm using (or at least trying to) extended DHCP Relay on JunOS 9.6R1.3 on M7i. I have noticed that when you enable DHCP relay on an interface then it drops transit traffic that is udp port 67 on *any* interface. I have a JTAC ticket open and they are telling me this is expected beha

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS 10.0R2.10 on M7i

Oops...Yes, I was talking about 10.0R2.10 ... Paul Goyette wrote: Hi, I have a few M7i's that I'm currently running 9.6R1.3 on and am getting ready to upgrade them to see if I can get away from an issue with extended dhcp-relay effecting transit traffic on an interface that it's not config

[j-nsp] JunOS 10.0R2.1 on M7i

Hi, I have a few M7i's that I'm currently running 9.6R1.3 on and am getting ready to upgrade them to see if I can get away from an issue with extended dhcp-relay effecting transit traffic on an interface that it's not configured for. I haven't had any stability problems with 9.6R1.3 and was

Re: [j-nsp] About upgrade Junos validation error

Luis, As a follow up to my response, I believe you are supposed to do a "delete chassis redundancy" and "commit sync" on the master RE before doing the upgrade if GRES is enabled. I'm not sure if this will stop some of the bad behavior Richard mentioned or not, but I don't think it can hurt.

Re: [j-nsp] About upgrade Junos validation error

Luis, Unfortunately, I did not have JunOS based devices back that far in releases, but what that message is telling you is that something in the configuration is not going to be compatible with the newer version, so if you use the no-validate option I believe you will have to correct the conf

[j-nsp] M7i DHCP Relay

I am trying to get DHCP relay working using either [forwarding-options dhcp-relay] or [forwarding-options helpers bootp] on an M7i w/IQ2 ethernet running 9.6R1.13. I have several double-tagged and single tagged vlans on interface ge-0/0/3 and am wanting to do relay on several double-tagged uni

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Q-in-Q

dag 28 december 2009 22:37 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Q-in-Q This is not possible until 10.0 on the EX. From: Kevin Wormington To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Mon, December 28, 2009 2:29:15 PM Subject: [j-nsp] EX4200 Q-in-Q

[j-nsp] EX4200 Q-in-Q

Hi All, I'm fairly new to EX4200s and am running 9.6R1.13 on a three member stack. Unfortunately, I already have live traffic on this so it somewhat limits my ability to test. I would like to be able to configure a trunk port to have some vlan members that are single-tagged and some that ar

[j-nsp] ATM1 pvc to vlan

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has an example config for a layer2 cross-connect between and atm pvc using rfc1483 bridged encapsulation and a vlan on an IQ2 GE port? I'm running 9.6R1 currently and it's an atm1 oc-3 card. Thanks, Kevin ___ juniper

[j-nsp] Changing advertised BGP metric based on condition

Hi All, I'm fairly new to JunOS running 9.6 on M7i gear. I have two M7i's that are each connected to one particular peer (same AS) that doesn't support BFD for BGP or BFD for routes and the links also go through an intermediate layer 2 switch (not ours; on the upstream side) so a fast failov

[j-nsp] J4350 Performance

I was wondering what kind of real world performance list members have seen out of the J4350 in regards to Mbps throughput and BGP with a couple of full tables? Kevin ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mai