Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 filter buggy?

amic allocation of TCAM to firewall filters in EX3200 and EX4200 switches was introduced in 10.0, see the release notes. ;-) .m -- Malte von dem Hagen Teamleitung Network Engineering & Operation Abteilung Technik --- Host

Re: [j-nsp] Single Fiber SM SFP

ex-series/ex3200/#ordering (scroll down)? .m -- Malte von dem Hagen Teamleitung Network Engineering & Operation Abteilung Technik --- Host Europe GmbH - http://www.hosteurope.de Welserstraße 14 - 51149 Köln - Germany Telefon:

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 virtual-chassis and vme access

the configured ip address. If you configure both vme and me0, "inet mode" and "ethernet-switching mode" collide. Regards, Malte * That's an explanation based on the effects. I don't know for sure what

Re: [j-nsp] Finally...

Hi, Am 20.02.10 17:26 schrieb Richard A Steenbergen: > Woohoo. Now if only it didn't take several hours to download all of the > half-dozen images you need to get for every platform, at a whopping > 250KB/s, one at a time, using lynx. You're right, that suck0rz big time. In 2010, one isn't used t

Re: [j-nsp] EX 3200 - no arp entries after power failure

Hi, Am 09.02.10 07:23 schrieb Kevin Oberman: > 'S' releases are "service releases" for E-EOL versions of JunOS. 9.3 and > 10.0 (and, I think 8.5) are E-EOL. 9.5 and 9.6 got service releases as well, > The service releases are only available by opening a ticket with JTAC. At least some are avail

Re: [j-nsp] EX 3200 - no arp entries after power failure

Hi, Am 08.02.10 21:33 schrieb Paul Waller: > We have a EX 3200 running JunOS 9.2R2 release. you really should upgrade. 9.2R2 is really old, and early versions of JunOS for EX series contained lots of nasty bugs. 9.6R3 seems quite stable so far... rgds, Malte -- Malte v. dem Hagen Teamleitung N

Re: [j-nsp] read-only config account, "rancid" user

Hi, Am 04.02.10 18:14 schrieb matthew zeier: > Not clear how to create a dumbed down read-only user who can just view the > config. > > In a Cisco world I'd use "privilege exec level" . In JunOS, a read-only > class can't run "show configuration". > > What's the nugget of info I'm missing?

Re: [j-nsp] tagged traffic on EX access port

Dan, Am 23.12.09 18:32 schrieb Dan Farrell: > It's the second stipulation that I have a problem with- we have a server > with VPS's hosted that are all currently using the same VLANID- but on the > server > (win2k8-dc) since there is only a single vlan defined on the port, it remains > as > acce

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10GE XFP

Hi, Am 14.12.2009 11:20 Uhr schrieb Martin Levin: > Ah, unfortunately that's no longer exactly true. > > Juniper doesn't vendor lock, all vendors work (sort of, I had trouble > with certain XFPs in EX4200 so buyer beware!) but certain functions > might not. As of now the only thing they have loc

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10GE XFP

Hi, Am 14.12.2009 9:28 Uhr schrieb Junaid: > Can I use XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1 in my EX switch's 10GE port? > Specifically, can I use XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1 instead of EX-SFP-10GE-LR > in my EX switch's 10GE port? yes :-) rgds! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [j-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

Hi, Am 30.10.2009 15:22 Uhr schrieb Derick Winkworth: > http://networkliberationmovement.net/ > > 15 hours some big announcement? Anyone know what this is? 15 days, most likely. Looks like a commercial. rgds, .m signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [j-nsp] RE0 SNMP Problem

Hi, Am 18.10.2009 13:17 Uhrschrieb Walaa Abdel razzak: > We have M320 router, we are monitoring the router through out of band > interface on re0, when we switch the routing engine to the backup. The > monitoring stop working, the NMS can't poll interfaces. I need to know > the reason for this and

[j-nsp] time-zone fun with 'commit at'

Hi there, anybody experienced this? We see it on EX-series as well as on MX-series. JunOS seems to dislike DST... rgds, .m {master}[edit] m...@ex8208-junos9.5s1.2# show system time-zone time-zone Europe/Berlin; {master}[edit] m...@ex8208-junos9.5s1.2# set interfaces ge-0/0/0 description foo {m

Re: [j-nsp] group interface

Hi, techt...@gmail.com schrieb: > Which Junos command is parallel to IOS "interface range"? there is none, please see http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2009-July/013598.html and following for a not-so-old discussion regarding this topic. Depending on what is your goal, groups or macro

Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Interface Strangeness

Bill, Bill Blackford schrieb: > That makes sense. I'm not at all happy with it, but it makes sense. I'm am > using ge-0/1/0 which must correspond to ge-0/0/20. > > Thanks. > > -b > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Mainer [mailto:mmai...@tekinside.com] > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 throughput trouble on 10GE interface

Hi, Michael schrieb: > I use 9.5R2.7. Very interesting information about 9.3. Where did you hear > about it? we ran into several severe bugs on our EX switches, regarding different functions (aggregated ethernet, virtual chassis, spanning tree etc. etc.) and got that recommendation from our Junip

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 throughput trouble on 10GE interface

Hi, Michael schrieb: > Recentle I've installed first ex4200 to my core network with 10GE uplink > module. Now almost every day in peak time I see sudden fall of throughput on > 10GE interface. Peak load is about 4G. At the moment outbound traffic falls > to 3G and users notice upload speed downgra

[j-nsp] EX3200/4200 Uplink modules NOT hot swappable

Hi there, I just like to share with you: It may be, the one or other of you reads the datasheet of EX3200/4200 switches and runs over the following, unspectacular and expected passage with just a slight nod: "Uplink modules can be installed without powering down the switch, enabling users to add

Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)

Hi, Hendrik Kahmann schrieb: > is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple times on the > same physical interface? IIRC, the vrrp-group identifier works via the mac address of the vrrp packets, so it has to be unique for each broadcast domain. > We want to use more than 255 VLANs

Re: [j-nsp] Add vlan to multiple interfaces on EX series

Hi, Bjørn Tore schrieb: > Actually HP has a quite smooth approach there; > > HP-switch# con > HP-switch(config)# vlan 11 > HP-switch(vlan-11)# tag a5-a7,a18-b2 that's similar to the way Foundry does it. Still bad style, since VLAN tagging when talking about port-based VLANs is an attribute of th

Re: [j-nsp] Add vlan to multiple interfaces on EX series

Hi, Matt Stevens schrieb: > Is there an easy way to add a new VLAN to multiple interfaces on the EX > series switches? I'd like to be able to use a port range for both adding > vlans to trunk ports and putting access ports into a specific vlan. yes, I definitely like to have a "interface range" a

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 log message question

Cord, Am 21.05.2009 02:23 Uhr, Cord MacLeod schrieb: > Every now and again I'm seeing the following log message: > > May 20 22:23:34 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address > matching on Wrong nh nh:1499, type:Hold...? > May 20 23:08:03 gsw1 fpc1 Resolve request came for an address >

Re: [j-nsp] bgp maxas-limit - JUNOS equivalent ???

Hi, Am 20.02.2009 13:00 Uhr, Berislav Todorovic schrieb: > I'm wondering if there is a way to limit the AS path length in JUNOS. > Yeah, bgp maxas-limit is available in JUNOSe, as well as in Cisco IOS, > but I can't find any reference to it for JUNOS (M/MX/T Series). > > Any info will be greatly

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP interface index change after upgrade to 9.2

Hej, Am 13.02.2009 13:15 Uhr, Chris Adams schrieb: > Um, how about using modern software that doesn't assume static interface > IDs? Interface IDs are never guaranteed to be static, so proper SNMP > software should handle them changing. what, if not ifIndex, should be a reasonable index for Inte

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP interface index change after upgrade to 9.2

Hej, Tore Anderson wrote: It doesn't happen due to reboots, but due to JUNOS upgrades. Like I wrote in my original e-mail, after upgrading from 9.3R1.7 to 9.4R1.8 all of my graphs stopped working. (The original poster reported it happened going from 9.1R1.8 to 9.2R2.15.) The «you'll just have

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Olive Torrents Legal?

Hi, Ana Bubiak schrieb: > Has Juniper relaxed rules with regard to Olive? my understanding is that there is no such thing as "Olive". Rgds, Malte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.net

[j-nsp] getting config comments via netconf

Dear colleagues, is it possible to get the full configuration as a XML object via netconf *including the comments*? Right now I am playing around with Richard's PHP client from http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/php-netconf-0.01.tgz which obviously uses which delivers no comments. When trying I un

Re: [j-nsp] Ethernet router suggestion required

Hi, Samit schrieb: > I am looking for a L2/L3 capable ethernet router with 20Gig ports in my > core, that should do full bgp feeds from multiple upstreams w/ , IPv6 > and multicast routing, MPLS and 4byte Asn in future. I am currently > looking into 4 products from 4 vendor. > > 1. Extreme BD 12