outing/IPsec is
unimpacted then it's OK, or could it be that the SRX300 will now perform
slower than before in terms of routing packets/IPsec
performance/throughput? Or is that stupid of me to think? :)
Thank you!
Regards
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mail
r are not
because RFC6907 ...
> But let me publish a ROA for 194.45.183.0/24-24,AS517 ... then we know.
Still in to see if Cisco XR would not accept this.
Sorry again for the non j-nsp noise, should shift this conversation away
from here ... but I couldn't leave this wrong-with-first-sh
Markus wrote:
|Mark wrote:
|> So the validator is not even showing either /24, only the /23.
|> Could it be implementing RFC 6907?
|https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3 ...
If I'm not mistaken, the RIPE validator uses
http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/
which lists for
is RFC in Junos.
Any idea how to workaround this in JunOS other than building
filters "somewhere else"? I wouldn't know how to easily drop
paths with AS_SET in JunOS.
Markus
--
AS286 - still here ...
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juni
dation
mechanism (and even works for more specifics, which you
can't do by just "spoofing" the origin AS).
Checking lg.seacomnet.com I see both /24 accepted as with
"RPKI State not found".
Markus
[*] Well, the validator should - beside validating the ROAs
- as well en
empty as-paths
seem to both log "as-set detected, validation result unknown".)
You still can provide a disable-rfc6907 option, but don't have the
default be "unsecure".
Thanks again,
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
you seeing & accepting for example 194.45.182.0/24 and / or
194.45.183.0/24? You shouldn't ... luckily these are just test
prefixes ...
ROAs 194.45.182.0/23-23,286
ROA: 194.45.183.0/24-24,12469
194.45.182.0/24: .* 286 2858 {517}
194.45.183.0/24: .* 286 2858 {517 12469}
Thanks for your ti
ke adding communities,
changing local-pref, but even then it doesn't harm).
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-subroutines-in-routing-policy-match-conditions.html
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Am 01.10.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Martin T:
When can one use "request system software rollback"?
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/reference/command-summary/request-system-software-rollback.html
"A software rollback fails if any required package (or a jbundle package
co
nd RE-850 where I replaced the HDDs with
SSDs, so I'm only guessing, its a shot in the dark, but did you try
cable-select instead of slave?
If it doesnt change anything I would try a HDD (SSD) with the exact same
size than the original.
Rega
Am 05.08.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Michael Loftis:
You can do a transparent proxy type setup. Using the firewall filter syntax
to change the next hop to a properly configured Linux, FreeBSD, or whatever
host.
The mail gateway I want to relay through is somewhere on the internet.
In this case chang
;t seem to figure it out by myself. Not sure if I even need NAT or not.
Anyone available to do this paid & rather quickly? Please contact me
off-list.
Thank you!
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.neth
Am 25.07.2015 um 10:42 schrieb Tom Storey:
I wonder if some double sided tape would suffice to hold it in place
until it needed to be replaced?
I doubt it, and IMHO, it's not necessary. When you plug the HDD into the
connector, the tail of the HDD will lift up, just like on the picture.
And t
Am 23.07.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Colin Baker:
Recently had a hard drive fail on one of our RE-850 in an M7i. Does
anyone have a known working (preferably SSD) replacement they can
recommend? I seem to remember something on juniper.cluepon.net that
certain models don't fit on the RE board all that
gards
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
them. Only one looking glass showed
me my-upsteam my-asn 23456, so I'm thinking maybe everything is fine and
only this particular LG cannot display 4-byte ASN and uses 23456 instead?
Sorry for the noise in that case. :)
Am 21.05.2014 23:20, schrieb Markus:
Hi list!
I'm trying to
upstream routers software does not yet
support 4-byte ASNs?
I'm also doing the same to various peers and there it works fine. I can
see the path "my-asn 22" in my peers looking glasses.
Thanks!
Markus
___
juniper-nsp m
ngine OK 44 degrees C / 111 degrees F
Routing Engine CPU OK 42 degrees C / 107 degrees F
Any experiences?
Thanks!
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
cate
Addresses, Flags: Is-Preferred Duplicate
Destination: fe80::/64, Local: fe80::8618:8801:5c06:1052
INET6 Address Flags: Duplicate
Thanks!
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
CF and HDD
automatically synchronous (copies it from CF to HDD), is that right?
If I never do "request system snapshot" and do not enable
mirror-flash-on-disk and one day my CF dies and the router reboots from
HDD, it will probably have a very old config, correct?
via routing protocol)
b) 1xMX240/480 with redundant SCB and RE
Pro: Easier to use redundant uplinks (LACP)
Con: Config error as well as chassis failure brings the whole PoP down
Any further arguments? Best practices? What did you deploy?
Best regards,
Markus
I don't seem to have anything configured related to that:
ad...@ffm01.rt> show configuration | grep arp
< empty >
Thank you!
Markus
Am 14.08.2012 21:37, schrieb JP Senior:
Hi, Markus.
I have experienced issues in previous deployments that have involved built-in
ARP policers.
Hit
an alternative dialup provider
everything is fine. Other sites on other boxes in the same LAN work just
fine though via the first provider. The problem comes and goes now.
Really puzzled!
Anyway, can't stop thinking about the ARP thing so I t
Dear list,
maybe I'm not good at searching today, but I can't find any info at
juniper.net and via Google on the difference between PE-1GE-SX and
PE-1GE-SX-B. Can anyone shed some light on this? :)
Thanks!
Markus
___
juniper-nsp ma
For what it's worth, I heard from someone that it also affected Foundry
and Microtik, and in one case, Cisco. All routers were running older
software releases and in the case of Microtik, upgrading to the latest
software fixed it.
Am 10.09.2011 06:56, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, M
ppens.
What can I do about this and what could be the cause? Help! :)
Thanks!
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
that just works. I'm offering money (PayPal, CC, wire) for
the person or company who is willing to do that.
You can get in touch with me off-list.
Thank you!
Markus
PS:
Item Version Part number Serial number Description
Chassis36947
hieve is to route a subnet of static IP addresses to the
endpoint of the tunnel behind a dynamic IP address.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Note that M160 PICs that were EOL when a new platform (M120..) was announced
are not supported by the new platform.
Example: fixed optics OC48 PIC
///Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
s and configured route advertisement)
with static routes, no warning appeared. I asked our sales, if this
means that no license is required but he negated that.
Regards
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nethe
et by Cisco."
Thanks,
///Markus Åberg
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: 24. syyskuuta 2009 8:46
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Miercom Competitive P
fault-route only when the full BGP feed session goes down?
What I want to achieve is that traffic to destinations which don't exist
in the global routing table won't get sent out to the upstream at all.
Can anyone point me to the right direction?
ing why the box didn't boot up fine after
we replaced the internal flash, and why /var could not be mounted. Maybe
it has something to do with 7.4 installed on the flash and 8.0 on the
new HDD? I'm a little lost here...
Thanks,
Markus
i make a tcpdump with the interface ds-6/3/0:1:1 and see on this
file the NTP packets?
Bye Markus
Paul Goyette schrieb:
> There are no traceoptions for ntp.
>
> However, you can use "monitor interface traffic" command
> to capture packets.
>
> Paul Goyette
> Ju
Hello NG,
i have configure NTP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] show
server 194.25.1.215;
source-address 62.225.19.80;
[edit system ntp]
How to set a traceoption or a debug to see the ntp packets?
Thanks for Help
Markus
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
35 matches
Mail list logo