Re: [j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

2023-12-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan via juniper-nsp
OK, Seems I understood it. Look like igp shortcut for keeping rsvp signaling going. That's why routes in inet.0 Thanks everyone for useful comments. On Mon, 11 Dec 2023, 21:57 Misak Khachatryan via juniper-nsp, mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>> wrote: The most annoying thing i

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

2023-12-11 Thread Misak Khachatryan via juniper-nsp
ch as rejection by bgp import policy. Better IMHO to focus instead [or additionally] on " show route resolution unresolved " -Michael > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp > mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>> > On Behalf Of > Misak Khachatryan

[j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

2023-12-11 Thread Misak Khachatryan via juniper-nsp
Hello, Recently I implemented RSVP in my network, nothing so fancy - automesh and autobandwidth with node-link protection. By doing final review i saw output of show route summary: inet.0: 296 destinations, 298 routes (275 active, 0 holddown, 21 hidden) Direct: 6 routes,