Re: [j-nsp] Junos route based vpn with Cisco

ou son > représentant, toute étude, diffusion, transmission ou copie de ce courriel en > tout ou en partie, est strictement interdite et peut être illégale. Tous les > messages peuvent être surveillés, selon les lois et règlements applicables et > les politiques de protection de notre entre

Re: [j-nsp] SRX to SRX VPN

com > +92-301-8247638 > Skype: fahad-ibm > http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Morten Isaksen wrote: >> >> I had the same problem (between a SRX and a Cisco box). >> >> It is most likely a mismatch between remote-ne

Re: [j-nsp] SRX to SRX VPN

_ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Morten Isaksen ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Basic VLAN setup on a J2320

                   destination-address any; >                    application any; >                } >                then { >                    permit; >                } >            } >        } > > > > > > On 2010-04-08, at 9:26 AM, Morten Isaksen wrote: > &g

Re: [j-nsp] Basic VLAN setup on a J2320

hr...@clgr01-fw03> show vlans > Name           Tag     Interfaces > default        1 >                       None > vlan-10        10 >                       ge-0/0/0.0* > vlan-99        99 >                       ge-0/0/0.0* > > chr...@clgr01-fw03> > > > > > - Chris. > &

Re: [j-nsp] Basic VLAN setup on a J2320

JunOS assumes that you have some trunk ports... somewhere... (as you have > declared under the [interfaces ge-0/0/3] stanza) for these VLANs if there's > no "untagged ports" associated with them. > > Regards, > > - Chris. > > > > > On 2010-04-08, at 4:05 AM,

[j-nsp] Basic VLAN setup on a J2320

; no-syn-check-in-tunnel; no-sequence-check; } } } vlans { bgp { vlan-id 12; interface { ge-0/0/3.0; } l3-interface vlan.12; } } -- Morten Isaksen ___ juniper-nsp mailing

Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

This looks a lot like the setup I am builing. I think you convinced me to go with the J2320. What version of the OS are you running? Any problems with ipv6 on the router? /Morten On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Niels Raijer wrote: > Op 18 feb 2010, om 10:52 heeft Morten Isaksen het volge

Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

License for J-Series», which > almost equals the list price of the smallest J2320.  I'm not sure what > exactly would make a BGP setup advanced enough to require this license, > though. Route reflector support. -- Morten Isaksen ___

Re: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

uniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Morten Isaksen > Sent: February-18-10 4:37 AM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router > > Hi! > > I need a BGP router that can handle 2 transits with full routetable > and 100-200 Mbit throughpu

[j-nsp] J2320 as BGP router

? -- Morten Isaksen ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp