What workaround is available? /Per
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] På vegne af Frank Blankman Sendt: 13. februar 2012 18:02 Til: David Temkin Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Emne: Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E We've seen PR718485 get hit on a 960 with SCB-E some 16x10G MPC and 11.4R1, though no recurring hits after applying the workaround. Running a config close to Dave's. Frank On Feb 13, 2012, at 3:26 PM, David Temkin wrote: > Not horrible, but similar results in a box with dual SCB-E and 2 16x10G MPCs: > > $ time snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c # x.x.x.x ifHCInOctets > /dev/null > > real 0m6.262s > user 0m0.028s > sys 0m0.018s > > So, it's usable - and I haven't hit any other showstopper bugs thus far - but > I'm running purely IP (two full tables + other associated peers). > > -Dave > > On 2/8/12 6:10 AM, david....@orange.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Same results on my side... >> >> Just a precision to be sure that there is no mis-understanding : it's not >> triggered by SCB-E, it is a software issue... But currently we only have >> this release to play with SCB-E :-) >> >> >> >> Regards >> David >> >> David Roy >> IP/MPLS Support engineer - Orange France >> Ph. +33 2 99 87 64 72 - Mob. +33 6 85 52 22 13 >> david....@orange.com >> >> JNCIE-M&T/SP #703 >> JNCIP-ENT >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net >> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Daniel Roesen >> Envoyé : mercredi 8 février 2012 07:44 >> À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Objet : Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E >> >> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +0000, OBrien, Will wrote: >>> Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh >>> MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running. >> Given that there is only one public JUNOS release which supports SCB-E, >> there aren't many options: 11.4R1 - and that one has unusable SNMP due to >> new PFE statistics request delays introduced (feature, not bug of >> course!): >> >> foo@lab-MX960> show snmp mib walk ifHCOutOctets | count >> Count: 413 lines >> >> $ time snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c removed x.x.x.x ifHCInOctets> /dev/null >> Timeout: No Response from x.x.x.x >> >> real 0m26.380s >> user 0m1.647s >> sys 0m0.133s >> >> PR/731833 - fix supposed to come in 11.4R3 slated for May. >> >> So as far as things stand, SCB-E not deployable before mid 2012 earliest if >> (and that's a big "if" when looking at 10.4 experience) 11.4R3 is going to >> be usable. >> >> Ah, and 11.4R1 floods your log with messages like: >> >> mcsn[91713]: %DAEMON-6: krt_decode_nexthop: Try freeing: nh-handle: 0x0 >> nh-index: 1049083 fwdtype: 3 >> >> No idea wether that's service affecting - we haven't observed any impact due >> to that yet. >> >> Best regards, >> Daniel >> >> -- >> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp