Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-26 Thread Peter Sievers via juniper-nsp
Hi, On 26.01.22 00:19, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote: Still don't see any incoming v6 VRRP from the other router. I also checked on a host on the VLAN and only see the v4 VRRP, not the v6. You may have hit the following PR. PR1449014 ([vMX] Different MAC address used for IPv6 in VRRP[3

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 Maximum Packet Rates

2021-05-20 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi Leon, both MX204 und MX10003/LC2103 use eagle forwarding ASIC, LC2103 Linecard has 3xASIC, MX204 has 1xASIC, WAN Output Rate for eagle pfe is for 100G Interface ~110 MPPS. Assumption is, that you got the traffic on the MX10003 over more than one PFE/ASIC incoming. BR, .peter On 20.05.21 11

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN with IRB and static routing

2018-04-19 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi Alex, Am 19.04.2018 um 14:48 schrieb Alex D.: If yes, try to deactivate CNH for family evpn ingress, I didn't configure chained-composite-nexthop explicitely, because it is activated by junos-defaults. How can i deactivate it in this case ? # set routing-option forwarding-table chained-co

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN with IRB and static routing

2018-04-19 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi Alex, Am 18.04.2018 um 23:50 schrieb Alex D.: Here's an example: VRRP master is attached at PE1. PE2 learns this VRRP IP via an EVPN type-2 route from PE1. Now, an IP packet for a DMZ host arrives at PE2 which has a static route pointing to the VRRP IP. PE2 doesn't label-switch the IP ipack

Re: [j-nsp] error: the ethernet-link-fault-management subsystem is not running on a EX2300

2017-03-03 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi, Am 01.03.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Valentini, Lucio: Any clue? EX2300 and EX3400 are not supporting LFM, CFM at FRS. .peter ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] MPC2E vs MPC2E NG

2015-10-13 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi, Am 13.10.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Adam Vitkovsky: Reading the SW features For example “Chained composite next hops” -these are there since ever so what’s changed And the rest of the stuff like ”Layer 3 VPN localization” (is going to be the same fun as SVD on XR) are all of those only avail

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

2014-07-01 Thread Peter Sievers
Sorry, fat Fingers. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

2014-07-01 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi, On 01.07.2014 08:29, Joerg Staedele wrote: > Hi there, > > it now happened the 2nd time that during a "request system snapshot" the > whole box (MX80 with JunOS 11.4R6) crashed and rebooted. The log showed: > > Jul 1 00:30:52 cr0 /kernel: umass0: at uhub0 port 3 (addr 2) disconnected > Ju

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

2014-07-01 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi, > it now happened the 2nd time that during a "request system snapshot" the > whole box (MX80 with JunOS 11.4R6) crashed and rebooted. The log showed: have a look at PR603468, Title: MX80: System crashed after using system snapshot multiple times resulting in DA0 corruption and stuck during

Re: [j-nsp] umass0 detached / MX80

2014-07-01 Thread Peter Sievers
Hi, On 01.07.2014 08:29, Joerg Staedele wrote: > Anyone else have seen this problem? I guess that I have to RMA the box :/ yes and no, you have to update the box. Have a look at PR603468, Title MX80: System crashed after using system snapshot multiple times resulting in DA0 corruption and stu