>> Because it's expensive compared to possible alternatives outside
>> J-Land, including, but not limited to, Force-10.
>
> force10's cost advantage is chipped away at by the OP's IPv6 requirement.
Yes, IPv6 and MPLS are not currently supported (and they might be or
not, in the future) by Force-10
> Basically, can someone give me reasons apart from "we don't need SONET
> or any other WAN interfaces, and it's cheaper per port", why should we
> NOT choose an MX box? Are there any gotchas waiting in the wings for
> someone who's used to the full flavored goodness that is the M/T
> series?
Bec
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Eric Van Tol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm experiencing a strange RX issue on a link and I need some more ideas on
> where to look. Two routers, an M7i and M20, are connected back-to-back,
> sort-of (there's optical gear between them, obviously), ov
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Derick Winkworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fiddling with the MX for a POC-like session, I found a couple of things
> others may find interesting...
>
> 1) On etherchannel bundles, traffic is distributed per destination-mac, per
> source-mac, or both. Unfortunat
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Brandon Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On the 7600 and the ASR1000, is that hardware accelerated NAT a
>> default option, or are those add-on features?
>
> On both the 7600 and the ASR it is in the base images and ready to
> just configure. Crazy for Cisco, I
Can I expand the question to what L2 and L3 VPNs methods are supported
on all J-series from J2320 to J3650 ?
Rubens
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to enable encapsulation vlan-vpls in J6350, but it is not
> supported on that platform. I
>> I'm sizing a J-2320, and noticed the following RAM and flash defaults:
>>
>> ? 256 MB DRAM default, expandable to 1 GB DRAM
>> ? 256 MB compact flash default, upgradeable to 1 G
>
> Juniper is nowadays shipping J2320-SC with 512M DRAM by default because
> of JUNOS 9.1 requiring more than the old
Hi...
I'm sizing a J-2320, and noticed the following RAM and flash defaults:
• 256 MB DRAM default, expandable to 1 GB DRAM
• 256 MB compact flash default, upgradeable to 1 G
What is possible and not with such a configuration, like installing
recent JunOS versions, FIB size, RIB size, L2 and L3
The funniest thing is this report being about a C product that
probably has the worst track-record I've seen in a carrier networking
product, the C10k.
Thanks for the good laughs.
Rubens
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Masood Ahmad Shah
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US
Hi,
Does anyone has experience with MPLS-TE interoperability between IOS
(specifically ME6500, but it's probably like any other 12.2SX IOS) and
JUNOS (recent/stable/good-for-service-providers version) ?
I was wondering about 2 cenarios in particular:
1) JUNOS as head-end or tail-end, but not midd
nored: unsupported platform (ex4200-24t)
> ##
>
> So I'd say that is a no... might just be a currently unsupported thing
> though.
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruben
I'm considering Juniper EX series for a new Metro Ethernet project,
but the specs on the site haven't answered some doubts.
- Does the EX has some "VRF-Lite" capability, i.e., multiple routing
tables, attachment of interfaces and protocol instances to different
contexts ? No MPLS involved, just pl
> Again - Juniper's main focus for this switch is the enterprise. They're
> trying to get some of that sweet, sweet Cisco territory that they've
> been so hungry for since purchasing Netscreen. Depending on the
> popularity of these switches, I wouldn't be surprised if they made a
> more formal e
Besides the 12k routes limits, the 28k MAC addresses limit is not a
hard one but somewhat less than a comparable ME6500 unit, which
supports 256k routes and 64/96k MACs.
If the Juniper EX software releases bring some Carrier Ethernet
features, the box could be a strong competitor on the Metro Ethe
On 11/1/07, Nicolaj Kamensek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Kawchuk schrieb:
>
> Chris,
>
> > You are correct. cFEB can be either 128 or 256. Again, since the cFEB
> > has all the actual forwarding routes for the router's ASIC's, you mya be
> > able to get away with only 128M for now, but again
ngineering, Service Providers
> Juniper Networks Inc., Canada
> local: +1 (403) 470-8174
> toll-free: +1 (866) 470-8174
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
> Jr.
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 9:27 A
Hi.
M7i routers can be ordered with 256 or 512 MB RAM system board memory;
any guidelines on what usage scenarios would make 512MB desirable or
even mandatory ?
Our need is a Internet router with 3 full-routing transit feeds and a
bunch of peering connections that made us specify more memory for
Although Giuliano asked how many channels can be bundled using MLPPP,
I think that the question can be answered also by using parallel IP
paths.
On M-series routers running on IP2, JunOS supports 16 equal cost
paths, isn't it ? How many equal cost paths does J-series routers
support ? Can the equa
18 matches
Mail list logo
