Re: [j-nsp] SRX100H

Hi Mehul, JTAC has recommendations published on the Juniper site, login required. Check there for the latest information. HTH. On 2020-03-06 10:12, Mehul Gajjar wrote: Hello Techie, kindly advice stable version of Juniper SRX100H. Thank you, ___

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

Jason, For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204 for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks like break out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces. -- Stephen On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Hey there, I’m l

Re: [j-nsp] SRX performance

Hi Mike, The SRX240H2 would handle that, assuming the packets-per-second were reasonably in line with the traffic rates. Remember there will be a performance impact depending on what features you enable. HTH. -- Stephen On 2015-12-20 9:16 AM, harbor235 wrote: Can anyone share real world S

Re: [j-nsp] J-Flow problem

looked at accounting-options, but none of the syntax seems relevant.. any pointers? -- Stephen Stefan Fouant wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Stephen Fulton wrote: Stefan, Thanks for the tip. I do have NTP set up and running correctly. -- Stephen When you run a 'show services acc

Re: [j-nsp] J-Flow problem

On 4/18/09, Stephen Fulton wrote: Greetings, I recently upgraded a J-series 6350 from 8.4 to 9.2, and it appears that it is no longer exporting, or properly exporting, version 5 flows. I'm at a loss, since the documentation on Juniper's site is simply wrong for the J-series -- ie.

[j-nsp] J-Flow problem

Greetings, I recently upgraded a J-series 6350 from 8.4 to 9.2, and it appears that it is no longer exporting, or properly exporting, version 5 flows. I'm at a loss, since the documentation on Juniper's site is simply wrong for the J-series -- ie. commands listed do not exist. Here's a redac

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS cookbook thoughts?

Gordon Ewasiuk wrote: > It's a no-nonsense guide too. Assumes a level of expertise regarding > protocols and standards. You don't get chapters and chapters of > theory and background. Just lots of practical, hands-on JunOS > commands and recipes. Best book I've purchased this year. I co

Re: [j-nsp] Strange latency when using traceroute.

> > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fulton > Sent: Sunday, 1 July 2007 3:05 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Strange latency when using traceroute. > > Hi all, > >

[j-nsp] Strange latency when using traceroute.

Hi all, I've noticed that when traceroute passes through our J6350 (using 8.3R15), that the returned latency is considerably higher from the router. Pinging the router or devices past it are fine, but this is one of those things I know I'll be asked about, and I haven't been able to figure ou

[j-nsp] Problem exporting BGP routes.

Hi all, I'm having an issue exporting routes to iBGP peers. I am able to import routes from my iBGP peers fine, but not export. I have tried several variations on policy statements which effect exactly what is being exported, but without the intended result (exporting a full table). Below I

Re: [j-nsp] BGP routes not being imported.

Hi all, Thanks for all your responses! I discovered the issue was self-made.. I had defined "maximum-paths 1" under routing-options, in the mistaken belief that this acted like the Cisco syntax, which installs only one path. Once I removed that, I was able to import routes. Cheers! -- Steph

[j-nsp] BGP routes not being imported.

Hi all, We recently picked up a J6350, and I'm in the process of bringing it up in our lab. Currently I'm attempting to import a full table from a iBGP peer, and while the BGP session is established, and the peer (a Cisco) is sending all the routes, those routes are not appearing in the RIB.

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS Litterature

Aviva, I just wanted to say I picked up your book "JunOS Cookbook" as a primer into JunOS, and it has been extremely useful, and we ended up picking up a J6350 as a result. -- Stephen. Aviva Garrett wrote: > Hi Jad, > > You might want to try to certification study guides at > http://www.juni

Re: [j-nsp] How many vlans does the PE-1GE-SFP support?

Thanks Steinar. I've also found out that the PICs will support number from 1-4093, so that is one less concern to worry about. The bundle I'm looking at is an M7i with "5 GE ports" so I've assumed that it's really 4 PICs and one built-in GE for management purposes. -- Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTE

[j-nsp] How many vlans does the PE-1GE-SFP support?

I'm evaluating bring Juniper M7i's into our network, and there is currently an option of an M7i with 5 GE ports (4 + 1 mgmt). I've assumed the GE's are PE-1GE-SFP's. I've been unable to find out how many vlan's this type of pic supports, so if anyone can assist, thanks! ___

[j-nsp] J4350/6350 experiences?

Hi all, At the last NANOG, the folks from Juniper made quite an impression on myself & a few other independent ISP operators in Toronto, particularly with regard to the J4350/J6350 series. The general consensus is that it is designed to take on Cisco's 7206/NPE-G1 platform at half-the-price.