[j-nsp] BFD issue on OSFP between ASR9001 and MX80

Hello all, hoping for some info. I am seeing an issue with BFD between an MX80 and a Cisco ASR9001. Long story short is I am seeing a bfd issue caused by adaptive mode on the Juniper. Setup isASR<--o-->EX4200<--o-->EX4500<--o-->MX80 | |vc| |vc|

[j-nsp] MX960 question on bridge domain MTU and regex expression.

Greetings all, Two questions.any input is greatly appreciated - 1. According to Juniper MX series book, "a bridge domain will look at all of the IFL's in the bridge domain that specifies the routing-interface of the irb." I've had two separate incidences where a physically down interf

Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 port mirroring on MX960

biah Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 3:18 PM To: Terry Jones Cc: Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Layer 2 port mirroring on MX960 Hi, as per the Juniper documentation, Note: Under the [edit forwarding-options port-mirroring instance pm-instance-name] hierarchy level, the protocol family statement

[j-nsp] Layer 2 port mirroring on MX960

Greetings All, I am trying to get a port mirror working with no success. I want to port-mirror ge-1/0/0 interfaces that is interface-type access. When I configure the forwarding-options, there is no longer a bridge option.only ccc, inet and vpls. Even though not showing, when I configure '

Re: [j-nsp] Information for expected fragmentation behavior on IPsec tunnel

riday, August 10, 2012 1:59 PM To: Terry Jones Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Information for expected fragmentation behavior on IPsec tunnel It should be dependent on the "df-bit" setting on the VPN. I don't remember which behavior is default, but setting it to

[j-nsp] Information for expected fragmentation behavior on IPsec tunnel

Greetings All, Could someone please point me in the direction of some good information for a current setup I have and would like to know what the expected behavior is. I have a site-to-site VPN setup between two SRX's. I'm in a development lab that has a static NAT out to the internet throu

Re: [j-nsp] VLAN-CCC over GRE extended to GE interface

te it. Thanks much! From: Keegan Holley [mailto:keegan.hol...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 4:25 PM To: Jack Bates Cc: Terry Jones; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VLAN-CCC over GRE extended to GE interface +1 GRE between loopbacks. Why not just use

[j-nsp] VLAN-CCC over GRE extended to GE interface

Hey Folks, Hoping for a little helpŠor confirmation of setup. I don't have time to lab up and need to make sure the setup will do as I need it to. The goal is to mirror traffic from a Brocade switch at one site over a layer 2 circuit back to another site. At each site, there is a Juniper router,