We have a very small deployment of ASR920 running 16.12. Work well for us,
and we do some pretty kinky/exotic stuff: small scale BNG, Internet in VRF,
selective FIB, port-based DHCPv4/v6/PD, IP unnumbered, IPoDWDM...
If you can stomach the BU wars, UADP is a nice ASIC - I think the Cat9k has
legs,
NCS-5501 non-SE version is 48x 10G + 6x 100G
NCS-5502 is 48x 100G
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:21 PM Aaron wrote:
> I was thinking about the ptx1000 as a supercore fast mpls swapping p-box.
> I understand it can have (24) 100 gig !
>
> I've seen the PTX1000 referred to as a supercore router , and
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
> Alright so would you mind sharing the business drivers that would make
> you migrate your current production infrastructure to this new unproven
> possibly buggy LDPv6 and 4PE/4VPE setup please?
>
>
>
> adam
>
Businesses bigger than me th
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> > Of Tim Durack
> > Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00
> > IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic.
> >
>
> And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2015-02-19 11:06 -0500), Tim Durack wrote:
>
> > What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite
> like
> > to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget...
> >
> > (Okay, I'd like
I notice draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 was posted February 11, 2015.
What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite like
to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget...
(Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last
piece for me.)
--
Tim:>
_
Can one run full IGP+MP-BGP VPLS/L2VPN/L3VPN on the ex4300?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Ben Dale wrote:
>
> On 20 Feb 2014, at 6:00 pm, Per Granath wrote:
>
> > For the mixed VC, the options are EX42+EX4550 or EX43+QFX.
> >
> > For VC, the EX42 uses VCP-cables, while the EX43 uses QSFP-DA
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Keeping it really stupid is what we're after :-).
>
> Mark.
We run Internet in a VRF, but I have to agree with Mark's comments.
Unfortunately, there are lots of Engineers/Vendors/Security
Experts/Auditors who think that "making it really compl
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Ralph Smit wrote:
> We're looking for a high-density 10GbE switch and our shortlist consists of;
> the Arista 7124S, Brocade TurboIron 24X, HP 6600-24XG and the EX2500.
ProCurve make a decent switch. Software cli is inconsistent, and
somewhat limited. We manage to
Linux ethernet bonding/teaming does not need to be switch assisted. If you
configure one of the non-802.3ad modes (TLB etc) and put the two NICs on the
same broadcast domain, everything will work.
We use TLB mode, which gives 2x outbound, 1x inbound, due to the way arp
resolution works.
Tim:>
On
On Jan 31, 2008 9:59 AM, Nicolaj Kamensek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antonio Querubin schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Anybody know if Junipers are able to do ethernet aggregation with an HP
> > Procurve 4000M switch? The Procurve 4000M config menu provides 3
> > different aggregation types: Trunk, FEC,
I have to wonder if vendors are subsidizing line cards with GBIC/SFP sales.
Once one vendor does it, everybody else has to follow to stay "competitive."
Either that or it such a huge cash-cow they wont let it go.
I guess the compatible design of GBIC/SFPs benefits the vendor not the
end-user, as
On Jan 10, 2008 5:38 PM, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:03:40PM -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm just wondering when this will end. I've spoken with a few
> > different vendors about their plans for optics and they all say that "we
> > don't l
13 matches
Mail list logo
