Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

2015-04-23 Thread Vijesh Chandran
: Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:54 PM To: Vijesh Chandran Cc: Olivier Benghozi; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question You are correct -- I misread the documentation. I think this will achieve you goal -- Though it would be simpler to write a filter with 2

Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

2015-04-23 Thread Vijesh Chandran
ly filter? -Vijesh From: Damien DeVille Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:17 PM To: Vijesh Chandran Cc: Olivier Benghozi; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question Actually, my example is incorrect. Filter f1 should read as follows: ddeville@testlab-rtr#

Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

2015-04-23 Thread Vijesh Chandran
ption-multiple-listed-overview.html <http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/firewall-filter-option-multiple-listed-overview.html> ). Olivier > Le 23 avr. 2015 à 17:18, Vijesh Chandran a écrit : > > Hi all, > I am wondering if we have a solution to th

Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

2015-04-23 Thread Vijesh Chandran
No subsequent term will be considered if a packet matches a term condition. Thats the problem here. Combining both may not work here I would think. From: Alexander Arseniev Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 9:56 AM To: Vijesh Chandran; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

2015-04-23 Thread Vijesh Chandran
Hi all, I am wondering if we have a solution to this issue. I need two firewall attached to an interface as input-list. e.g.: f1 and f2. Input-list [f1 f2] f1 to match a condition (all tcp port 80) and accept and count that packet. f2 to classify those packets based on code points and pus

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OID for last signalled LSP bandwidth

2015-03-16 Thread Vijesh Chandran
om the LSP but it's not >reliable, there are points where the value will reset to 0 and you don't >really know when it's going to be. Another way to get the data is via >Junosscript. You can use this call: > >$jnx->get_mpls_lsp_information(ingress => "1"

[j-nsp] SNMP OID for last signalled LSP bandwidth

2015-03-15 Thread Vijesh Chandran
Is my following assumptions correct? Below red colored one is the last signaled/reserved bandwidth for a given LSP (this one). What would be the SNMP OID to get this value if yes. LSP is configured as autobandwidth. User@router>show mpls lsp name FROM-USNYC3-BBISP-GW2-TO-USSJC2-BB-PE1-VRF-1 de

Re: [j-nsp] Request for help: Firewall config to match fragmented ipv6 packet

2015-03-14 Thread Vijesh Chandran
-for-ipv6-traffic.html > > >On 3/14/15 19:55, Tim Jackson wrote: >> ... V6 fragments don't exist. >> On Mar 14, 2015 7:36 PM, "Vijesh Chandran" wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>>Is it possible to match a fragmented ipv6 traffic using juniper fw

Re: [j-nsp] Request for help: Firewall config to match fragmented ipv6 packet

2015-03-14 Thread Vijesh Chandran
rch 14, 2015 at 7:55 PM To: Vijesh Chandran mailto:vij...@juniper.net>> Cc: jnsp mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Request for help: Firewall config to match fragmented ipv6 packet ... V6 fragments don't exist. On Mar 14, 2015 7:36 PM, "Vijesh Chandran

[j-nsp] Request for help: Firewall config to match fragmented ipv6 packet

2015-03-14 Thread Vijesh Chandran
Hello, Is it possible to match a fragmented ipv6 traffic using juniper fw term? Please help if someone knows this. -Thanks, Vijesh ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp