: Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:54 PM
To: Vijesh Chandran
Cc: Olivier Benghozi; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question
You are correct -- I misread the documentation. I think this will achieve you
goal -- Though it would be simpler to write a filter with 2
ly filter?
-Vijesh
From: Damien DeVille
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:17 PM
To: Vijesh Chandran
Cc: Olivier Benghozi; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question
Actually, my example is incorrect. Filter f1 should read as follows:
ddeville@testlab-rtr#
ption-multiple-listed-overview.html
<http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/firewall-filter-option-multiple-listed-overview.html>
).
Olivier
> Le 23 avr. 2015 à 17:18, Vijesh Chandran a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
> I am wondering if we have a solution to th
No subsequent term will be considered if a packet matches a term condition.
Thats the problem here.
Combining both may not work here I would think.
From: Alexander Arseniev
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 9:56 AM
To: Vijesh Chandran; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi all,
I am wondering if we have a solution to this issue.
I need two firewall attached to an interface as input-list. e.g.: f1 and f2.
Input-list [f1 f2]
f1 to match a condition (all tcp port 80) and accept and count that packet.
f2 to classify those packets based on code points and pus
om the LSP but it's not
>reliable, there are points where the value will reset to 0 and you don't
>really know when it's going to be. Another way to get the data is via
>Junosscript. You can use this call:
>
>$jnx->get_mpls_lsp_information(ingress => "1"
Is my following assumptions correct?
Below red colored one is the last signaled/reserved bandwidth for a given LSP
(this one). What would be the SNMP OID to get this value if yes.
LSP is configured as autobandwidth.
User@router>show mpls lsp name FROM-USNYC3-BBISP-GW2-TO-USSJC2-BB-PE1-VRF-1
de
-for-ipv6-traffic.html
>
>
>On 3/14/15 19:55, Tim Jackson wrote:
>> ... V6 fragments don't exist.
>> On Mar 14, 2015 7:36 PM, "Vijesh Chandran" wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>Is it possible to match a fragmented ipv6 traffic using juniper fw
rch 14, 2015 at 7:55 PM
To: Vijesh Chandran mailto:vij...@juniper.net>>
Cc: jnsp mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Request for help: Firewall config to match fragmented ipv6
packet
... V6 fragments don't exist.
On Mar 14, 2015 7:36 PM, "Vijesh Chandran
Hello,
Is it possible to match a fragmented ipv6 traffic using juniper fw term?
Please help if someone knows this.
-Thanks,
Vijesh
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
10 matches
Mail list logo