prefix rejected
kind regards,
-andy
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:20 PM Alexander Arseniev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does this help?
>
>
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/16.1/m-mx-t-series-toc.html
> <https://ww
k
this would suffice: "^1234+ .{0,2}"
I think with cisco you can do this with backreferences, but Junos doesn't
seem to support those.
TIA,
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
rror: ConnectError(host: ip.address, msg:
Unexpected session close
IN_BUFFER: `
error: unknown command: xml-mode
error: permission denied: netconf
`)
TIA!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
-primary-and-preferred-addresses-and-interfaces.html
Hope that helps,
Andy
Andy Koch
Hoyos Consulting LLC
ofc: +1 608 616 9950
an...@hoyosconsulting.com
http://www.hoyosconsulting.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
switch. Do you have a link to the EoS/EoL notices?
Thanks,
Andy
Andy Koch
Hoyos Consulting LLC
ofc: +1 608 616 9950
an...@hoyosconsulting.com
http://www.hoyosconsulting.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Hi Ross,
I essentially use the example straight from here:
http://forums.juniper.net/t5/Day-One-Books/Day-One-Book-Securing-the-Routin
g-Engine-on-M-MX-and-T-Series/ba-p/92276 and they work great.
HTH,
-andy
On 7/27/15, 2:45 PM, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Ross Halliday"
wrote:
onger than
15m (we let it go to 50m before we ended it).
We'll continue to test and monitor and I'll report back here if we have
issues. thanks to everyone for their help!
-andy
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Andy Litzinger <
andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Majdi
x.x.x.x/32;
}
}
}
thanks,
-andy
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:36:20AM -0700, Andy Litzinger wrote:
> > We're configuring a new sip setup with a phone vendor. The provider
> pbx
> > sits ins
to contact the remote sip gateway
Is my sip alg truly disabled? If so, any ideas why calls might be dropping
at the 15m mark? The phone doesn't actually disconnect, but the call stops
working.
many thanks,
-andy
Here's some relevant config snippets:
srx01> show security alg status
The flow configuration is working as posted- i was testing this in a
legacy setup and forgot there was another firewall in the path between my
mx80s and my flow collector.
thanks all for the help!
-andy
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Andy Litzinger <
andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com>
information
TFEB Slot: 0
Flow Packets: 5806, Flow Bytes: 3942763
Active Flows: 2, Total Flows: 3907
Flows Exported: 3458, Flow Packets Exported: 3454
Flows Inactive Timed Out: 3206, Flows Active Timed Out: 699
regards,
-andy
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Scott Granados
Yes I do. Sounds like I need to pole a hole?
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
>
> Do you have a firewall in your loopback?
>
> --
> Eduardo
>
> Em quarta-feira, 14 de janeiro de 2015, Andy Litzinger <
> andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com>
flow inline-jflow
Flow information
TFEB Slot: 0
Flow Packets: 1445, Flow Bytes: 1419455
Active Flows: 22, Total Flows: 935
Flows Exported: 764, Flow Packets Exported: 752
Flows Inactive Timed Out: 623, Flows Active Timed Out: 290
regards,
-andy
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:16 AM,
acl- basically widening it on the cisco side
to include every IP subnet ('any'). Not sure if that's allowed.
Either way it looks like i've got some good options to try.
Thank you!
-andy
On 10/15/14 3:50 PM, "Ben Dale" wrote:
>I've certainly had no iss
#x27;ve got two
subnets. I would happily use a simple policy on the ASA side like 'permit
ip any ' if i was confident I wasn't
going to have squirrely issues with connectivity.
What do you think?
-andy
On 10/15/14 3:22 PM, "Ben Dale" wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>I ha
t zone to untrust zone NAT when going to corp-hq IP space?
or is there another clever solution?
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
+1 regarding input on VCF
Does anyone have any practical experience with a VCF either mixed-mode or
not? We're evaluating it as a replacement for legacy 6509s. Cisco is
pitching a Nexus 6004 + FEX solution.
regards,
-andy
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger <
redundancy group) you'll
> be golden.
>
>
>
> On 6 May 2014, at 10:44 am, Morgan McLean wrote:
>
> > Andy,
> >
> > Assuming you have your own IP space, you put a public address on the
> > loopback. Whichever member is active for lo0 will handle the IPSEC if
?
thanks!
-andy
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Use your loopback and put that in a reth.
>
> Thanks,
> Morgan
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Andy Litzinger <
> andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Two rela
X cluster to an AWS VPC? Any
tips or tricks you care to share?
regards,
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
grade OpenSSL to 1.0.1g, and PR 981148 has been submitted for IVE OS to
disable TLS heartbeat.
SSL VPN (IVEOS) 7.3, 7.2, and 7.1 are not vulnerable"
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 3:41 PM, "Andy Litzinger"
> wrote:
>
> I opened a JTAC case for the same issue. JTAC said their
I opened a JTAC case for the same issue. JTAC said their security team is
aware of the CVE and they are waiting for fix/recommendation.
-andy
On 4/8/14 2:51 PM, "David B Funk" wrote:
>We have a SA4500 SSL VPN box with the JTAC recommended 7.4R8.0 release.
>Testing by tool
act anything in this
case?
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
expect the probe that relied on the
route with the higher local pref via MX80-A would fail from MX80-B if my
current theory of stale routes is correct.
-andy
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> That would be one hell of a coincidence to have the same bug acros
Hi Adam,
how can i tell if fast external failover is enabled? I haven't had any
luck finding the command or the Junos documentation. Same question for
Next-Hop Address Trac(k)ing
thanks!
-andy
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Vitkovský Adam wrote:
> You can verify whether
ppens
at BGP session initiation.
is it fair to say that if you are directly connected to your neighbor and
that interface goes down that the expected behavior of GR is it should
abort and routes from that neighbor should immediately be removed?
-andy
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Andy Litz
Hi John,
you might be spot on- graceful restart is configured for this peer and it
does look like my side is respecting it:
> show bgp neighbor
Options:
I'll let you know what I find out
-andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:10 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
> I've only seen somethin
A logs BGP neighbor state change to Established - rpd[1344]:
RPD_BGP_NEIGHBOR_STATE_CHANGED: BGP peer x.x.x.x (External AS Y)
changed state from OpenConfirm to Established (event RecvKeepAlive)
-andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Payam Chychi wrote:
> Are you sure? Ive never seen
nance- for
example during times when i've deactivated the neighbor config. Am I
correct in thinking this is because in this scenario even though the RE is
taking awhile to remove the routes from the FIB the actual next hop router
is still available and thus the routes are still valid?
-andy
holdtime,
but that appears to be set for 30 seconds.
I see that cisco has a feature called 'fast-external-fallover' that
bypasses the hold-down timer. Is there an equivalent in JunOS? what is
the Juniper best practice to handle link failure between eBGP neighbors?
than
, but you need to
size it appropriately to allow the multicast required in your network
(including things like VRRP).
HTH,
-andy
From: juniper-nsp [juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] on behalf of Chris
Evans [chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
an update- we finally moved our SRX fab links off of the EX switch and the CPU
load on the EX did not change.
-andy
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Andy Litzinger
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 7:51 A
Hi Muhammad,
yes, JTAC agrees with you :). We installed the NPCs using the KB procedure
today and had no issues.
thanks!
-andy
From: Muhammad Atif Jauhar [mailto:atif.jau...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:54 AM
To: Andy Litzinger
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j
ow this guide:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB26674 which seems
overly complicated and possibly not applicable. It seems to deal with the case
of wanting to move a live SPC from one slot to another. They say it applies to
an NPC- but I'm not moving a live NPC, I'm i
into your OS's
trusted certificate store.
hth,
-andy
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of EZ Joe
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:46 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] S
I believe it was "set vlans disable-Mac-learning
Xe-2 is not the backup RE. 1 & 3 are the primary and backups respectively.
-andy
On Oct 4, 2013, at 6:59 PM, "Phil Fagan"
mailto:philfa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What was the syntax to kill the learning? This is indeed
. so I disabled it and
let it run for 1 minute (via commit confirm 1). The entries dropped out of the
mac-learning-log, but it didn’t have any noticeable impact on my CPU.
the mac enumeration still seems like a weird deal though. I’ll report back
anything JTAC uncovers.
-andy
From: Phil Fagan
01> show configuration interfaces fab1
fabric-options {
member-interfaces {
xe-9/0/1;
}
}
srx01> show configuration interfaces xe-1/0/1
srx01> show configuration interfaces xe-9/0/1
srx01>
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
ast heartbeat only goes to other servers that subscribe to the same
multicast address- not send it to every server in the vlan. does my config
seem like a valid way to do this? I don't need to route the multicast across
subnets.
thanks!
-andy
here are the relevant config snippets and the i
Any explanation ?
Andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
force me to remember the
weird workaround to get things back online. Also, although I don't know how
reproducible this is for others, it seems like I may have hit a bug somewhere.
-andy
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
ggregation-group-configuring-cli.html
-andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Per Westerlund [mailto:p...@westerlund.se]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:07 PM
> To: Andy Litzinger
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] trouble setting up link agg between c
is just the state I
left it in during troubleshooting. you'll note that the second interface, 8/2,
is also actually shutdown in the config I posted. I have tried setting both to
active and both to passive with no luck.
-andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Per Westerlund [mailto:p...@we
t trunk allowed vlan x,y
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
spanning-tree portfast edge trunk
end
the 6509-B config is identical
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
I think your source ip range netmask should be /0, not /32. I.e: 0.0.0.0/0
On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:19 AM, "Brijesh Patel" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> EX4500 firewall filter configuration :
>
>
>
> Connectivity : F5 Load balancer <- Ex4500 <-- Internet
>
>
>
> I want to configure ex
ons. Has anyone done it?
-andy
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of Andy Litzinger
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 4:29 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Share static routes between ro
Filter Based Forwarding, but I'd like to
avoid that if possible; it just doesn't seem as clean.
thanks in advance!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
uld I fork over the money to use optics?
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
it working well? any
caveats?
we've also considered collapsing the edge too, but the cost of say an MX-480
with similar port count is about twice that of an MX-80 + QFX/EX
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.ne
ICU sounds interesting. Any idea why it's not supported on the 550? or is that
just documentation lag?
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Haynes [mailto:chay...@centracomm.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 3:08 PM
> To: Andy Litzinger; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>
to:xmi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:11 AM
> To: Andy Litzinger
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX upgrade procedure -ready for enterprise?
>
> I would never, ever follow that KB. It's just asking for a major outage..
>
> With that
ions. It seems a complicated procedure fraught with
peril. Anyone out there have any thoughts (positive/negative) on their
experience on upgrading an SRX cluster with minimal downtime?
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.
Hi all,
we're looking at an SRX 550 and have been posed with the choice between using
the "cloud" based anti-virus or the on-device. Are there any compelling
reasons to pick one over the other?
thanks!
-andy
___
juniper-nsp maili
eyes checked.
As far as I'm aware mx80 doesn't support tuneable optics you have to buy the
right dwdm channel.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Direct: 020 7531 5656
Mobile: 07813 975459
Reception: 0800 2888 680
Web: www.inetc.co.uk
Email: a...@inetc.co.uk
Sent from my
net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Cheers,
Andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Keith,
I have operated MX-480 networks installed with DPC's and within the last
year have deployed MX-480's with MPC's/MIC's and haven't experienced the
hardware issues you have run into. Based on my experiences with Juniper
hardware, I would say you've just had u
I assume if it is in the logs as a trap, that a trap was indeed sent.
Since the trap should have originated from the RE, you should be able to
see it leave the router with 'monitor traffic interface ' on
the interface that is the best route back to your NMS.
Cheers,
Andy
-Origin
We have 5x MX80-48T that all do this so I am interested in the answer too...
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 020 7531 5655
Mobile: 07813 975 459
Fax: 01538 382596
Web: www.inetc.co.uk
Email: a...@inetc.co.uk
___
juniper-nsp
the ifAlias would be populated.
Cheers,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Serge Vautour
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:43 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ifAlias on sub-interfaces
We are using bfd on mx80 with 300ms timers and no problems. Only 2 or 3
sessions per box however.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 0870 803 1868
Mobile: 07813 975459
Fax: 0870 803 1781
Web: www.inetc.co.uk
Email: a...@inetc.co.uk
On 3 Mar 2011, at 17:53, David Ball
Is ok to disagree as your captures below prove your point and that you
are correct.
Apologies for the misinfo
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Smith W. Stacy [mailto:st...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:02 PM
To: Andy Vance
Cc: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j
le to test quickly, I'm going from memory, I
could be wrong...
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Smith W. Stacy [mailto:st...@netfigure.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:36 AM
To: Andy Vance
Cc: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Aggregate Routes Revisited
I don&#x
eived?
Cheers,
Andy Vance, IP Engineer
360networks
2101 4th Ave., Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98121
253.307.7546 (c)
andy.va...@360networks.com
www.360networks.com
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.2/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-services/topic-29823.html
Don't let that M7i hear you call her old, you might hurt her feelings.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 020 7531 5655
Mobile: 07813 975 459
Fax: 01538 38
ad: No, BPS
overload: No
Thank you to everyone for the assistance.
-Andy
On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:08 AM, Doan Nguyen wrote:
Starting JUNOS a requirement for cflowd to work is to configure
NTP as Stefan pointed out a few emails earlier.
--- On Wed, 8/18/10, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I tried both layer-3 and layer-2-3 with no effect.
I also manually took the PIC offline and brought it back up.
-Andy
On Aug 18, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Nathan Sipes wrote:
Did you set the services for the card under the chassis section..
fpc 1 {
pic 2 {
adaptive-services
lay=46.515, rootdispersion=14.961, peer=43788,
refid=204.152.184.72,
reftime=d016a4a1.c6f63e1b Wed, Aug 18 2010 13:27:45.777, poll=6,
clock=d016a4d5.07841ed1 Wed, Aug 18 2010 13:28:37.029, state=4,
offset=-0.073, frequency=62.639, jitter=2.050, stability=0.004
-Andy
On Aug 18, 2010
I'm trying to enable flow accounting on one of our M7is. JunOS
version is 9.1R8. No matter what I do, I can't get a flow to export.
I'd appreciate any input to obvious errors, or tips on other things to
try. I've also tried removing sampling from the interface and doing
it with a firewa
juniper does support LDP for [H-]VPLS, although they don't shout about
it. I have done interop testing between juni mx's & tellabs 8800's & it
works fine
~andy
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun.
main on for packets destined
*to* the router, e.g. bgp sessions. Ergo the memory-pit transcends reboots.
Best wishes
Andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
350/6350 for, precisely because of the added
complexity and total resource of that this flow-mode presents.
> I have no issue with flow features being added, looks great for branch office
> use.
This trade wont come back until there is a rebuild of JUNOS sans enhanced
service
We currently have all of our M20's on 8.5S4 and have had no issues whatsoever,
we upgraded from 7.5-daily. 8.5S4 is an extended release and if you're not
chasing features, I'd look into utilizing it.
Cheers,
Andy Vance
Sr. Network Engineer
Speakeasy
Direct > 206.971.5144 .
standing too, I achieve the mac limit with
"ethernet-switching-options secure-access-port interface blah mac-limit 1
action shutdown". A mac acl can be used as you describe too.
Ideally, I would like this mac-limit feature for trunk ports too.
Andy
___
Andy Davidson wrote:
On 30 Jan 2010, at 15:41, Kevin Wormington wrote:
陈江 wrote:
RE400 is a standard PC running on Intel Celeron400 and 82443BX mainboard. Your
could check SPEC of Intel 82443BX how much DRAM it supported. And I don't think
there is any limitation in JUNOS.
I took a
ve configurations ? :-)
I would be interested to hear empirical evidence that 2x512GB certainly would
work, or certainly would not work.
Best wishes,
Andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
used in the upgrade.
5. The upgrade will take place for both routing-engines whilst in service.
Cheers
--
andya...@shady.org
---
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down
to their level, then beat you with experie
David Coulson wrote:
Is there an alternative method of doing this without having consistent
VLAN IDs?
On 3/12/2010 9:44 AM, Andy Harding wrote:
The VLAN numbers at both ends of the l2circuit need to be the same for
it to work.
This is a very poorly documented limitation of the l2circuit
pture traffic on the l2circuit to see what is going on?
The VLAN numbers at both ends of the l2circuit need to be the same for
it to work.
This is a very poorly documented limitation of the l2circuit feature.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 020 7531 5655
Mobile: 07813
olicy-statement VRFX_IMPORT {
term import {
from {
protocol bgp;
community VRFX;
}
then accept;
}
term reject {
then reject;
}
}
Cheers,
Andy Vance
Sr. Network Engineer
Speakeasy
Direct
re
functionality than
the OEM'd model and support will be direct as opposed to going to Customer ->
JTAC -> BNT -> JTAC -> CUSTOMER.
--
andya...@shady.org
---
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down
to their level, then beat
Direct routes are to the prefixes assigned to interfaces on the router, local
routes are for the /32 interface addresses on those directly connected
interfaces.
Cheers,
Andy Vance
Sr. Network Engineer
Speakeasy
Direct > 206.971.5144 * Fax > 206.728.1500
Email > ava...@hq.speakeasy.n
Without config snapshots of the VRF, the import policy and the export policy,
it is difficult to say why you see this behavior, I have some ideas but I don't
want to guess. Can you provide config snapshots? I don't want to assume and
head down some road that may not be relevant.
Ch
than this, you should find it quite a straightforward process -
Support on Juniper is more uniformly good than on many other technology
families, and for this we should be grateful to Juniper.
Best wishes
Andy Davidson // www.netsumo.com
___
junipe
;
}
term out {
from protocol [ direct static ];
then {
community add vpn-andy-router1;
accept;
}
}
term reject {
then reject;
Cheers,
Andy Vance
Sr. Network Engineer
Speakeasy
Direct
Does anyone happen to have the 7.4R2.6 jinstall for the J-series laying around?
I need a copy and have yet to find one.
Cheers,
Andy Vance
Sr. Network Engineer
Speakeasy
Direct > 206.971.5144 * Fax > 206.728.1500
Email > ava...@hq.speakeasy.net<mailto:ava...@hq.speakeasy
-(more)--- pause - does this mean it's fixed in this version ?
Andy
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
internal config as 32Mx8bit which is incompatible with the
> Intel BX440 chipset used in the RE. It's quite likely that only 50% of
> the RAM would show up or not work at all.
I take your's worked fine? Was this a RE-400 (m7i)?
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Ph
s the part we normally buy however Crucial no longer list it on
their site and the above link doesn't seem to want to ship to the UK...
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 020 7531 5655
Mobile: 07813 975 459
Fax: 01538 382596
Web: www.inetc.co.uk
Email: a...@i
mmend a supplier (prefer in the UK)?
Thanks.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
None that I'm aware of, can you shoot a show hard and a show ver from that
chassis with the card in? We have GE cards in slot 0 but I don't recall any
card type limitation.
Cheers,
Andy Vance
Sr. Network Engineer
Speakeasy
Direct > 206.971.5144 * Fax > 206.728.1
]
family inet
there is also:
[edit forwarding options hash key]
family multiservice
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos95/swconfig-layer-2/id-load-link-sec.html
This is used to layer-2 links can also "look at" the layer-3 and layer-4
information.
Cheers,
-Andy
On F
I've seen this in the past with media converters and was able to work around it
using
gigether-options {
no-auto-negotiation;
Hope that helps,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Richard,
Appears these are the releases that it has been fixed in.
8-1-4p0-4, 8-2-4p0-7, 9-0-2p0-1, 9-1-2p0-1, 9-2-1p0-1, 9-3-0p0-1, 10-0-0
This caused us problems this evening as well and some issues we continue to
work on with JTAC at this time.
Andy
-Original Message-
From
ithout problems but I
don't have the part # to hand.
In fact, the stuff we ordered came with an identical sticker /
appearance to the original Juniper RAM...
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 0870 803 1868
Mobile: 07813 975
To enable ECMP load balancing:
routing-options {
forwarding-table {
export load-balancing-policy;
}
}
policy-options {
policy-statement load-balancing-policy {
then {
load-balance per-packet;
}
}
On Jan 28, 2008 8:54 AM, Sven Juergensen (KielNET)
<[EMA
[edit]
show | compare
On Dec 27, 2007 2:06 PM, Wayne Lansdowne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I apologize..my first posting attempt did not come through correctly.
>
> I'm new to the Juniper routers having previously worked with Riverstone.
> Within the Riverstone CLI I had the abil
aceoptions flag packets
file show /var/log/rsvp.log
Hope this helps.
-Andy
On Nov 13, 2007 1:49 PM, Imran Moin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a situation where I need to remove Fast Reroute through the RSVP
> signalled MPLS backbone. However, before doin
e will be 2 different, equal paths from Router A to Router C.
At this point, you follow Chris' config to do the load balancing and your
good to go.
You're on the right track when you the talk about using 2x GRE tunnels, but
do this with MPLS instead.
I can still send you the config exa
w paths.
In the end, you will have 2 equals paths going in 1 direction, and a single
path in the other. If you need to move more traffic, then simply add a 3rd,
4th, etc LSP.
Please let me know if you need further explanation/configuration samples.
-Andy
On 11/8/07, Hamid Ahmed <[EMAIL PR
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
