Re: [j-nsp] BFD Session

If it's an intermittent issue with Ping reachability, then check out interface errors as well. On top of that find out if there are any memory errors (where data gets buffered) in the Syslog i.e. CRC failing.. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Jeff Haas wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 2017, at 3:05 AM, Mo

Re: [j-nsp] Measure transit traffic to specific destination

If you don't wanna pay then make use of a free collector (aka opensource) i.e. http://www.ntop.org/ (i have had and used this +1) Or more here: https://www.pcwdld.com/free-open-source-netflow-analyzers On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote: > > I’m sending IPFIX flows to Scr

Re: [j-nsp] how to get maximum interface unit value in JUNOS script

The maximum value is 4096 (0-4095), when you create more than 4095 logical units with VLAN encapsulation, the message "limit of 4096 vlans/dlcis exceeded" Here is Juniper reference: http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB28265&actp=search P.S: It may varies hardware to hardware

Re: [j-nsp] MPC4D-32*GE Major Alarms

Some of the alarms are transient (should generate Syslog trap though), and they generate a Chassis alarm upon occurrence (i.e. PFE<>Fabric plane took a hit of CRC errors and then got recovered through fabric healing). Sometimes Chassis does not clear alarm when the transient state gets cleared and

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 with 3 RE's?

.png.jpg Cheers, Masood On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > Then how do they have 3 RE's listed and house in the picture? Is the 3 RE > in the 3 SBC just in there, but would not be powered on or usable? > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:

Re: [j-nsp] Gracefully delete MPLS RSVP LSP

Raising LSP metric sounds good to me On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:00 PM, tim tiriche wrote: > Hello, > > i have 2 LSP to the same destination. > > 1st LSP name = R1-R2-a > 2nd LSP name = R1-R2-b > > I have link protection enabled. > > i want to delete the 1st LSP and wanted to know what is a grace

Re: [j-nsp] purpose of "commit check"?

Hi - "commit check" is just there to verify the syntax and integrity of the configuration, but do not activate it. Pretty self explanatory as you already explained it :-) On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Martin T wrote: > Hi, > > when I commit the candidate configuration in Junos, I tend to exec

Re: [j-nsp] OS upgrade

Here you have the official answer, pretty self explanatory: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.1/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/13.1/index.html?topic-78897.html On 10 Jun 2015 8:35 pm, "james list" wrote: > Hi > My question is more related to the official path...

Re: [j-nsp] Ingress QoS Marking Now Fully Supported on MX Routers - Junos 14.2R3.8 Release

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Scroll down to the 4th top-level bullet: > > "Support for packet marking schemes on a per-customer basis (MX Series > only)" > [Masood] I would say that this is incorrect and misleading. It should be MX Series T

Re: [j-nsp] Ingress QoS Marking Now Fully Supported on MX Routers - Junos 14.2R3.8 Release

Thanks for sharing, Mark! Are you sure that it supports all Trio-bsaed cards and afterwards... Juniper documentation confirm it for the Type-5 FPC (T4K) only though. On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > Hi all. > > Gosh, what a road this has been! > > Some of you may recall I sta

Re: [j-nsp] Distributed PPM and LACP always goes into Queue 3. host-outbound-traffic knob has no effect -- bug?

. Highly likely a bug then. On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Huan Pham wrote: > Thanks Masood, > > This seems to be version specific and it is a bug on 11.4R7.5 (on MX5 I > tested to be specific) > > On 12.3R8.7 I do not encounter this problem. The queue that (one hop) BFD

Re: [j-nsp] Distributed PPM and LACP always goes into Queue 3. host-outbound-traffic knob has no effect -- bug?

AFAIK host-outbound configuration or lo0 output filter will NOT influence the PFE generated traffic. Only the output interface filter can match the PFE generated traffic. Cheers, Masood On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Huan Pham wrote: > Hi list, > > I've tested in the lab an

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIS-SP study materials?

I highly recommend Juniper day one books: http://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/jnbooks/day-one/ In addition to that "Network Mergers And Migrations" book by Gonzalo and Jan All the best! Cheers, Masood On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Pyxis LX wrote: > Hi, all. > > I

Re: [j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6

Can you provide a "show route hidden extensive" through pastebin.com or something like that... Your pasting is not easily readable and that makes it hard to help.. Cheers, Masood On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Jonathan Call wrote: > I apologize. The email looked fine when I got

Re: [j-nsp] ARP on unnumbered interfaces

-guidelines/interfaces-configuring-an-unnumbered-interface.html Cheers, Masood On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Mihai wrote: > Hello, > > After the migration of a large network from a Cisco 7600 to a MX104 a lot > of users started to have random problems with their connection. > The

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 Sampling - High CPU

d-64bit or 32bit? Cheers, Masood On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Jordan Whited wrote: > I don't have any issues when sampling is disabled. > > No improvement from what I can tell between 12.3R8.7 and 14.1R3.5. Still > seeing active-paths in the RIB advertised to other neighbors

Re: [j-nsp] MX480 SCB firmware issue

It could also be a hardware issue in either the referenced scb0 or back connector. Have you tried the following: Re-seat the scb in its slot, and then check for bent pins at this time (you can use a flashlight) Swap the scb0 with a spare (Or borrow one from another slot 1, 2) Cheers, Masood On

Re: [j-nsp] Verifying Juniper ECMP

See inline, prefixed [Masood] ... On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:09 AM, John Neiberger wrote: > ​Another question: if a link in a ECMP "bundle" goes down and then comes > back up later, do things end up hashed and balanced the same way they were > prior to the link going dow

Re: [j-nsp] Moving routes between VRF and inet.0

inet.0 inet.0 ]; # Primary table floating.inet.0 import-policy pol-accept; } } Cheers, Masood On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Tom Eichhorn wrote: > Dear all, > > I am currently fighting a bit with rib-groups, and I hope someone > could point me in the right directio

Re: [j-nsp] WARNING: THIS DEVICE HAS BOOTED FROM THE BACKUP JUNOS IMAGE

over can be done when needed. The following URL will point you how to recover from this sort of condition. Just start from "Step-by-step recovery procedure for this situation:" http://goo.gl/BoUUlA Cheers, Masood On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, >

Re: [j-nsp] RE accessories

+1 Is it charging the router or doing something to make it error/bug free :) Thanks BR// Masood > Dear Juniper, > > I will deploy one of these on every router until all my cases are > resolved. :) > > http://cluepon.net/ras/juniper-accessory.wmv > > Love, > ras >

Re: [j-nsp] problem with ospf between linux/quagga and JunOS via GRE interface

check de MTU On 20-Nov-2010, at 3:53 PM, Sergey wrote: > On Saturday 20 November 2010, you wrote: > >>> I attempted to remove "point-to-point". No effect.:-( >> >> You possibly need it on the interface - but you ALSO need it under >> protocols > > It has no effect. And I can not understand w

Re: [j-nsp] problem with ospf between linux/quagga and JunOS via GRE interface

check de MTU On 20-Nov-2010, at 3:53 PM, Sergey wrote: > On Saturday 20 November 2010, you wrote: > >>> I attempted to remove "point-to-point". No effect.:-( >> >> You possibly need it on the interface - but you ALSO need it under >> protocols > > It has no effect. And I can not understand w

Re: [j-nsp] GRE Tunnel bet JUNIPER and CISCO

tunnelX ip tcp adjust-mss 1436 On juniper side you can add the following knobs under the gr interface conf gr-x/x/x { unit x { clear-dont-fragment-bit reassemble-packets tunnel { path-mtu-discovery Thanks BR// Masood > People, > > We are trying to close a GRE tunnel betwee

Re: [j-nsp] Family "Any"

here you go ... http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/policy-configuring-firewall-filters.html BR// Masood > Dear Team, > > Can any one guide me the purpose of family "any" under [edit firewall] >

Re: [j-nsp] Urgent

Here you go... http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swconfig-system-basics/configuring-a-dhcp-server.html From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of chandrasekaran iyer Sent: Thu 12/17/2009 6:39 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net S

Re: [j-nsp] ad1 msg on Juniper M series

TENSION-Not:) The write cache is disabled by default. If you're a Unix guy then mpt manpage holds more information. Just keep in mind that turning the disk's write cache on puts your data at risk. :-( Regards, Masood From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.

Re: [j-nsp] Recover/Reset Passwd on juniper netscreen

can without making any change and then reset and reconfigure from scratch when you absolutely need to make a change. Kind Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of George Sent: Saturday, October

Re: [j-nsp] Block traceroute and Allow Ping

the Linux implementation uses UDP, unless you apply the "-I" option, in which case it will use ICMP. Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Truman Boyes Sent: Wed 9/30/2009 10:34 To: Iftikhar A

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 and Broadcom NICs on Linux Server

what kind of routing issue this is? -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Shane Ronan Sent: Sat 9/26/2009 23:54 To: juniper-nsp Subject: [j-nsp] EX4200 and Broadcom NICs on Linux Server Has any else experienced routing issues with Broadcom NICS on a L

Re: [j-nsp] E120 Configure single domain to authenticate from adifferent RADIUS

is more scalable and reliable than having a separate server for a specific domain. And this way server farm can act as both a primary and backup at the same time. Regards, Masood From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Jason Alex Sent: Wed 8

Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?

much more..Unfortunately, life is not so easy :) Regards, Masood From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Derick Winkworth Sent: Sun 8/9/2009 8:06 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls? MPLS does not "

Re: [j-nsp] tacplus on EX3200

can use local-user-name attribute for a specific user as well. service = junos-exec { local-user-name = allow-commands = "" allow-configuration = "" deny-commands = "" deny-configuration = "" } Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/

Re: [j-nsp] License configuration for M-series

the configured package. Regards, Masood > Hi > > Recently I have installed Multi Service PIC on M-series Router (M40e). I > also got license for MLPPP with MS PIC. > > Show chassis hardware (Output) > > FPC 4REV 04 710-011725 KG2692M40e

Re: [j-nsp] router protect policy

It seems "source-prefix-list" is being ignored by EX-3200. If "source-prefix-list: statement being ignored; would you use source-address (for the time being) :) Regards, Masood > I'm trying to form a router protect policy on an EX3200 that is being used > as a laye

Re: [j-nsp] ex4200 throughput trouble on 10GE interface

? Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > I've disabled flow control when thoroughput fall occured again. That > didn't > help, but I investigated new information. On cisco side I have noticed > oversize errors on 10G interface, about 2000 per second. After juniper

Re: [j-nsp] Restore M7 to initial state

mas...@voyager# load factory-default You might also need to delete configuration archives nd logs. Have a look @ /config /var/db/config /var  Regards, Masood > It is possible to restore an M7i to 'brand new' state ? > (Like ios write erase and reload) > > Thank

Re: [j-nsp] re-write rules - query

> show configuration class-of-service interfaces ge-2/0/0 { unit * {   rewrite-rules {     dscp dscp-rewrite;     exp exp-rewrite;     }     } } Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > Dmitry, Thanks for the clarification. In a specific ex

[j-nsp] JUNOS IS-IS QoS

classification criteria (dscp=48/exp=6) used to classify routing traffic such as BGP/OSPF/LDP etc. So does it mean that ISIS traffic is always treated as BE. Is there anything else that is hardcoded for ISIS QoS? Regards, Masood ___ juniper-nsp mailing

Re: [j-nsp] NetScreen ScreenOS and the use of /31s

yeah, it does. Regards, Masood > Did the Google search but have not found the answer yet. Does anyone > know /if/ ScreenOS supports the use of /31s for PtP interfaces? > > -- > -Mike Mainer > > ___ > juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP static bindings on J2320

that said, did you know that Juniper JTAC is the only way to resolve this issue :) Regards, Masood > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 06:08:03PM +0500, mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote: >> the services router supports dhcp client requests received on fast >> ethernet interfaces only. dhcp is n

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS RSVP

information-products/topic-collections/swconfig-bgp-mpls/ldp-over-rsvp-te.html Regards, Masood > Currently we have a small network of 3 Cisco 7206 routers running MPLS > using > LDP as the distribution protocol and we are replacing them with Juniper > MXseries routers. In designing

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP static bindings on J2320

-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/14116 Regards, Masood > Hello, > > I'm using J2320 (JunOS 9.5R1.8) as a router in office network with ~10 > VLANs. > DHCP works good on it but there is confusing issue with DHCP static > bindings. > I've configured binding

Re: [j-nsp] DMVPN on Juniper

?? Regards, Masood > Hi Masood, > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:53 PM, wrote: >> I am not sure if this is right for you :) >> >> http://kb.juniper.net/kb/documents/public/junos_es/JUNOS_ES_Multipoint_VPN_with_NHTB.pdf > > Thanks for replying! This configuration

Re: [j-nsp] DMVPN on Juniper

I am not sure if this is right for you :) http://kb.juniper.net/kb/documents/public/junos_es/JUNOS_ES_Multipoint_VPN_with_NHTB.pdf Regards, Masood > [apologies if you receive this on-list twice.] > > Hi all, > > Can anyone tell me what the equivalent functionality to DMVPN is in

Re: [j-nsp] How to upgrade junos 5.0.0r8.1

Are you using both of the firewalls as n active/active or active/passive; if yes thn you can try upgrading one of them while the other will take care of your production services. Regards, Masood > Hi there, > > I have two juniper netscreens one is Firmware 5.0.0r8.1 . Now I have > e

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper (M20) - GRe Tunnel - Cisco(7206)

e a simple clear-text password with no encryption. You can enable debug on Cisco box and see if you can catch the key; do the same thing on Juniper box (traceoption is your friend there) Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:junipe

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0

sorry! i ve not seen ur subz interfaces earlier... my bad :) Regards, Masood > > > Masood, > > Do you think its possible to configure anything other than unit 0 > without vlan-tagging? I hope that answers your question. > >> ge-1/1/0.1 upup inet

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0

Your configuration is missing "vlan-tagging" Is behaviour remains the same if you add "vlan-tagging" under interface configuration. Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > > Hi > > AFAIK, basically a unit 32767 is created implicitly when "vlan-t

Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0

Cisco kit is 1 to 4094 with VLAN 1 being the default VLAN. I suspect VLAN 1 might be what you are talking about when they refer to VLAN 0. However, to muddy the water, Cisco's documentation for the 3750 reveals that there IS a VLAN 0 - but only when you're using VOIP Regards, Masood

Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7

with a crypto package or not. If not then you have to get JUNOS domestic release Regards, Masood > Hi Guys > > while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am > getting the following error. > > > r...@bom-sc20# commit synchronize > re0: > [edit sy

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

With the current hardware/software arch, I'm afraid you can't do that (I'm not sure though). Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Li Zhu Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 1

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS EXP bit marking question

the rewrite-rule will take effect on both tags and all the labels in label stack. Regards, Masood > All, > > There is a network like CE --- PE --- P. The PE is M320. Traffic is from > CE > to P. The traffic out of CE is native IP, after it reaches and gets out PE > (then t

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP UDP encapsulation

juniper rsvp msgs are sent as raw IP datagrams (protcol 46), if i'm not wrong same goes for cisco. normally udp encapsulation is needed for routers that cannot do raw network i/o. BR// Masood Senior Network Operations Engineer Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ -Original Message-

Re: [j-nsp] Path MTU Discovery - MPLS VPN

path mtu check requires at least one IP address must be associated with each vrf. If an IP address is not associated with the routing instance, icmp reply messages cannot be sent. BR// Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > Hi, > > I've been trying to get Path MTU Discovery

Re: [j-nsp] Path MTU Discovery - MPLS VPN

statement under chassis. [edit chassis] vrf-mtu-check; BR// Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > Thanks Masood, I have an FE associated with the VRF on the CE/PE router > with a /26 assigned and so I assume I meet that requirement? > > Should path MTU check work within the MPLS c

Re: [j-nsp] Ex Series Bandwidth Policer

cific; term 1 { then policer 10m; } Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > Here is what i came up with, but it didnt seem to work. I just want to > rate-limit ALL traffic to 10 meg, so i assume using the source address of > 0.0.0.0/0 is correct. > > I had t

Re: [j-nsp] ISIS general questions

s only the ISIS adjacency that is torne down. BFD becomes complex when you use this along with GRES, it can be harmful too, since a GRES event without BFD enabled would not otherwise cause the router to be removed from the routing topology and associated routing updates to be generated. Regards, M

Re: [j-nsp] Ex Series Bandwidth Policer

ctly on an interface and use filter-specific under [edit firewall family family-name filter filter-name] Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brendan Man

Re: [j-nsp] BGP load-balancing

You don't need to configure per packet-load balance during the JNCIP-M lab. All you have to do is multipath.. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aamir Saleem Sent: Tuesday, March 24,

Re: [j-nsp] L2TPv3

king it possible to tunnel MPLS over networks that do not have MPLS enabled on their core routers. The following URL will confirm this. http://tinyurl.com/cb3dte Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] ispf support on Juniper routers

ddown Time to hold down before running an SPF (2000..2 milliseconds) rapid-runs Number of maximum rapid SPF runs before holddown (1..5) {master}[edit] Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.ne

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP issue...

This is what it should be like r...@testcommunity HTH Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nilesh Khambal Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:53 AM To: Derick Winkworth Cc: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] bgp maxas-limit - JUNOS equivalent ???

I agreed with something Jared said. You never know whom you are going to connect next to (Cisco :)). Save yourself n Save Others Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch Sent

Re: [j-nsp] snmp oid for polling DCU

This will take you on a snmp journey . ja...@r1# run show snmp mib walk 1 Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of shariq qamar Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 6:46 PM To: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP interface index change after upgrade to 9.2

It's a simple UNIX file 'dcd.snmp_ix' ("I believe Juniper guys don't change format/syntax of the file with each upgrade."), if you back /var/db/dcd.snmp_ix while upgrading your JUNOS software and then later restore it. ja...@r1> file list /var/db/dcd.snmp_ix

Re: [j-nsp] transfer between 2 ns2000's is slow

I would suggest check CRC and duplex mismatch twice :) if everything goes fine then you better play with the following TCP tweaks.. flow no-tcp-seq-check flow tcp-syn-check flow tcp-syn-bit-check Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] NSM

Check if you can find something similar while sitting at your J series :) set system services outbound-ssh client nsm Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of SunnyDay Sent: Wednesday

Re: [j-nsp] Installing backup default-route from upstream by BGP condition?

I have replied to a Juniper forum topic on same issue. Please find the link below.. http://tinyurl.com/ba4r7p Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Markus Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 3

Re: [j-nsp] E320 question

Yea sure, but you need to keep an eye on redundant RSP, LM and interface related configuration .e.g. less or more number of physical interfaces, LM or RSP. Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] cisco equilent com in juniper : under bgp configuration mode

This has already been discussed on list... the following URL will take you to the QPPB/DCU http://markmail.org/message/et4gc4ysscxio7ra -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Wednesday, Febr

Re: [j-nsp] Mpls Ldp

Label advertisement mode: downstream unsolicited Juniper: Label distribution control mode: ordered (not sure) Label retention mode: liberal Label advertisement mode: downstream unsolicited Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] M120/M320 Cacti Templates

http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=11320&highlight=juniper -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: [j-nsp] M1

[j-nsp] JUNOS funny or bad poetry :)

JUNOS guys promise they would not make it boring! If you don't want to configure something on JUNOS, spend some time with JUNOS haiku. http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/archive/2009/01/07/juniper-junos-funny-poetry.as px ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy

What's wrong in using two terms J Regards, Masood From: Ahmad Alhady [mailto:ahmad.alh...@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 10:23 PM To: Masood Ahmad Shah; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy but in 2 different

Re: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy

; route-filter 10.0.6.0/24 orlonger; } then accept; } Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmad Alhady Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 9:52 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] EX Series Experiences

http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/archive/2008/12/26/juniper-switches.aspx Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brendan Mannella Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 5:10 AM To: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] cisco "network" command equivalent

nterface se-0/0/0.0; } } Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maurice Gil Cruz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:05 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] cisco "network" command equivalent Hi

Re: [j-nsp] JR "Global static route" configuration

). In Juniper world Qualified Next Hops is the way to go. For example, routing-options { static { route 1.1.1.1/32 { next-hop 2.2.2.2; qualified-next-hop 3.3.3.3 { preference 5; } } } } Regards, Masood -Original

Re: [j-nsp] Unequal-Cost Load Balancing for OSPF

load balancing on two unequal links, which will result in wasted bandwidth at best and a bottleneck at worst. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farhan Jaffer Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:59 PM To: Iftikhar Ahmed

Re: [j-nsp] bgp as-path

neighbor remove-private-as Removes private AS numbers in updates sent to external peers. Private AS numbers are only in the range 64,512-65,535. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SunnyDay Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008

Re: [j-nsp] Metro Ethernet CPE

PPPoE over ATM encapsulation. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GIULIANO (UOL) Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:38 PM To: FAHAD ALI KHAN Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Metro Ethernet CPE J-Series can help you. J

Re: [j-nsp] M-Series Authentication via Tacacs and authorization via local class

When you are using RADIUS or TACACS+ authentication, you can create single accounts (for authorization purposes) that are shared by a set of users. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos57/swconfig57-getting-st arted/html/sys-mgmt-authentication4.html#1039222 HTH Regards, Masood

Re: [j-nsp] dhcp-relay on MX

instance of the server to forward if different, include the routing-instance statement. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:01 PM To: Nicolaj Kamensek Cc: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF inside VRF - Cisco Juniper Interoperability

;OSPF route type extended community attribute", You can try this too. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Junaid Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:44 AM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] OSPF inside VRF - Cisco Juniper Intero

Re: [j-nsp] Strange RX issue w/ GE PIC

There can be multiple reasons for these input errors. Policed Discards Frames that the incoming packet match code discarded because they were not recognized or of interest. Usually, this field reports protocols that the JUNOS software does not handle, such as CDP. L3 incompletes This counter is

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

Yea you can have established LSP without LDP. Guess how :) What if you are running both LDP and RSVP... ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Junaid Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:35 PM To: Farhan Jaffer Cc: Juniper Puck Subject: Re: [j-n

Re: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel

-list if you are using... Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Farhan Jaffer Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 7:06 PM To: Juniper Puck Subject: [j-nsp] LDP Session over GRE Tunnel Hi, I am testing connectivity over GRE tunnel, IBGP

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

will already have one with lower administrative distance. I strongly suggest you change your application interface which should not permit 0.0.0.0 and such things entering to database while configuring user profile. Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

Re: [j-nsp] Restricting RADIUS Routes for E120

Yea you can set the route preferences ( In Cisco world administrative distance ). For this you need to find the route preference radius attribute ... here is the list of supported radius attributes... http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/erx50x/swconfig-broadband/html/ radius-attributes.h

[j-nsp] egress PE disappear explicit-null

I came up with an issue, Juniper M Series router is inability to pop explicit-null and decreasing IP TTL at the same time, making egress PE disappear from traceroute, when using core-hiding and explicit-null. Is there any workaround. ___ juniper-nsp mai

Re: [j-nsp] Originate a default route

-originate; Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Adams Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:55 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Originate a default route I'm trying to originate a default route on a

[j-nsp] PPPoE tunnel and Firewall

I’m really getting confused while adding firewall for DSL subscribers. I want to protect my PPPoE subscriber from malicious traffic. Adding a firewall between DSLAMs and BRAS is kinda confused for me. The final topology is going to be like CPEß-->DSLAMß---àFirewallß--BRAS

Re: [j-nsp] generic ospf question

at we configure areas :) Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ying Zhang Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:52 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] generic ospf question Hi list, Just wondering, if an area is con

Re: [j-nsp] Load balance with 2 adsl pics

-policy/htm l/policy-actions-config11.html Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah BLOG: http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 2:10 PM To: Juniper-Nsp Subject: [j-nsp] Load balance with 2 adsl pics

Re: [j-nsp] Full routing table feed on M7i and M10i

The full BGP table of the internet is big. The BGP table is held in memory. If you use 1GB of RAM or more, you can store 3 full BGP table. M7i and M10i both comes with fast CPU, You will not have to worry about processing, it's juniper :) Regards, Masood -Original Message- From: [

Re: [j-nsp] list admin garbage - unimportant you can delete me

Many thanks for running one of the leading mailing lists. Keep it up.. you are great Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah BLOG: http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:40 PM To: Masood Ahmad Shah Cc: '

Re: [j-nsp] test - ignore

Pass :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Erasmus Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:10 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] test - ignore test to mailing list - ignore please ___

[j-nsp] Track-IP functionality in Junos

I am looking for a track-ip functionality in Junos, which will be able to retire a route based on IP reachability (ping or something like this) Is this anything we can do? Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Is this true

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps133/prod_system_test_report 0900aecd801b9424.html :) Regards, Masood ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

  1   2   >