Hello Community,
Is there any way to filter frames based on do1p marking on m-series routers ?
I need this to police vpls traffic in ingress.
I tried with the "user-vlan-1p-priority" command but it seems that it is not
supported on m120, m7i and m10i platforms...
term 1 {
from {
Hello ,
Could you please help me find any juniper document specifying what are hardware
and software requirements on M7i router to support combination of Layer 2 and
Layer 3 Classification on the same e GigaEthernet interface ..
I have an IQ PIC interface on wich i tried to configure dscp an
interface .
Krasi
On 3 May 2011 19:24, "meryem Z" wrote:
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
interface ge-1/2/8.250;
}
site S12-GPON-E {
site-identifier 5203;
multi-homing;
site-preference primary;
interface xe-2/1/0.250;
}
}
}
"
On Tu
Missing no-tunnel-services or vt interface .
Krasi
On 3 May 2011 19:24, "meryem Z" wrote:
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
: RE: [j-nsp] several vlans under one vpls routing instance
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 12:05:14 -0400
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of meryem Z
> > Sent: Tuesday,
hello,
I'm trying to configure serveral sub-interfaces under the same vpls routing
instance on junos 9.6 m7i router and 10.3 on M120. but still doesn't work.
with one sub-interface it works fine.
I found some juniper docs on this subject but it was related to mx-series..
my config is as follows
Hi community,
I configured ldp based vpls on a juniper m120 router to interoperate with a
huawei router.
so far ldp session is up , vpls connections are up, but vpls ping doesn't.
some outputs below.
Do you have any idea on what is going wrong here?
Thank you.
user@router> show route forward
Hello Community,
Does any one already tests Juniper BGP based VPLS interoperability with other
vendors? I have some trouble to make it work with huawei routers. BGP peering
is Up but no vpls connections.
please to communicate your configuration of both sides.
Thanks a lot.
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:18 +0300
> From: pek...@netcore.fi
> To: merye...@hotmail.com
> CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MTU issue between juniper routers
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, meryem Z wrote:
> > - MTU on Ge interface is configured to 4484 on
Hello Community,
I have the following issue with MTU between some P-PE routers:
- MTU on Ge interface is configured to 4484 on both ends of the links. but ping
(from P to PE ) greater than 1600 bytes fails.
- I checked interfaces configuration , and also did a "show interfaces" to
verify the e
07 -0600
> CC: sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> To: merye...@hotmail.com
>
> I'm not certain, but I think this will fix your issue...
>
> [edit routing-instances foo protocols vpls]
> user@R1# show
> no-control-word;
>
> --Stacy
>
> On Mar 18,
oun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of meryem Z
> > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 12:26 PM
> > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] disable status vector on juniper router>
> >
> > Hello Community,
> >
> > For compatibility reasons with huawe
Hello Community,
For compatibility reasons with huawei routers we need to disable the BGP status
vector (or bit vector) on juniper router. Is it possible ? and how ?
Thanks a lot.
___
juniper-nsp mailing l
Hello Community ,
on an M320 router running junos 9.6 I had a problem of BGP routes hidden due to
BGP loops. So i used the command "set routing-instances
protocols bgp local-as loops 2"
to allow loops.
but then i got the following error message :
'local-as'
Invalid loop count configured
er
Hello community,
Is secure ftp supported on juniper m-series routers running junos OS 9.0 ? what
are alternatives to secure ftp tranfers ?
Thank you.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.
#2 0x42681e88 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
> #3 0x01c00c64 in vlogging_event ()
> #4 0x01c00af4 in vlogging ()
> #5 0x01c00ce4 in logging ()
> #6 0x01ab9670 in pic_clean_init ()
> #7 0x01a16308 in mcontrol_check_backup_active ()
> #8 0x01a16e20 in msm_exec ()
>
re files
>
> You could use gdb. But the likelihood of any success without source code is
> slim.
>
> You're better off sending them to jtac.
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:36 AM, meryem Z wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello community,
> >
> > Is there any
Hello community,
Is there any tool to debug vmcore files generated on an m-series juniper router
?
Thanks.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/
Hello Community,
I have a problem with an m7i router with junos 10.0 installed. When issuing
somme commands like "show log messages", the router hangs and stop responding.
I checked cpu (~20%)and memory (~50%)load and it seems normal.
Have you ever met this kind of problem ? is it a bug in the O
in the Release notes. Feel free to put
> whatever pIC you want in any slot; or change how Juniper sent them to you
> in-chassis.
>
> - Chris.
>
>
> On 2011-01-12, at 8:27 PM, meryem Z wrote:
>
> > I didn't fin
Hello Community,
When a juniper router is delivered , PICs are usually already installed.
I need to know for an M10i router for example, what is the default hardware
layout (slots used by default for each type of PICs) ? I didn't find any
recommandation about slots to be used for each type of
hello ,
I guess You can see stats about dropped packets with the "show interface
ge-0/0/0 extensive" command ..
u...@host> show interfaces ge-2/3/0 extensive
Physical interface: ge-2/3/0, Enabled, Physical link is Up
Interface index: 20, SNMP ifIndex: 16
Link-level type: Ethernet, MTU
hi all ,
is it possible to configure on SSG-500 two VIPs pointing to the same private ip
addresse for the same port number??
example : VIP1 : all dns request towards 84.23.34.2 nat it to 10.4.55.5
VIP2 : all dns request towards 84.23.34.3 nat it to 10.4.55.5
Thanks
Regards
Hi ,
here is a starting point :
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-routing/creating-routing-table-groups.html#id-10439786
Meryem.
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:02:47 -0400
> From: dwater2...@gmail.com
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] rib group
>
hello Community,
Can anyone suggest a Cos model related to L2VPNs ? Also what are the
limitations for this type of VPNs?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
_
Hotmail : une messagerie perfo
merye...@hotmail.com; david@orange-ftgroup.com;
> juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>
> Meryem:
>
> Maybe try a firewall filter with a counter on the egress interface?
> Something like:
>
> from forwarding-class
> from loss-priority high
> then count fc-blah_lp-h
net
>
> Meryem:
>
> Maybe try a firewall filter with a counter on the egress interface?
> Something like:
>
> from forwarding-class
> from loss-priority high
> then count fc-blah_lp-high
> then accept
>
> --Addy.
>
>
> On 3/11/10, meryem Z wrote:
>
> Orange France - RBCI IP Technical Assistance Center
> Tel. +33(0)299876472
> Mob. +33(0)685522213
> Email. david@orange-ftgroup.com
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether
hello Community,
I configured a forwarding class with high priority loss. Now I need to verify
that the traffic sent under this forwarding class ( using a traffic generator)
has a high priority loss. The "show interface queue " doesn't show this
information. is there any other way to do it ?
Thank you.
_
Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante de
Microsoft
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_
Hello Community,
For testing purposes I need to force the traffic to take a the secondary LSP
between two routers instead of the direct path. I need to do this only for one
routing instance.
It is possible to do this ? and How?
Thanks a lot.
Meryem.
th percentage defined in a scheduler will be
> calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate.
>
> Thanks,
> Raghu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behal
offered traffic load is
> greater than the shaping rate. ie. If you have a 5Mbps scheduler and you
> offer 5.01Mbps you will see queuing...
>
>
> On 22/02/2010, at 8:51 AM, meryem Z wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello community,
> >
> > i need to verify Cos sch
Hello community,
i need to verify Cos scheduler on my logical interface. to do this i need to
simulate Congestion conditions.
The question is : how to congestion a logical sub-interface without impacting
the physical interface. is it possible to set a bandwidth limit for the
sub-interface?
Hello Community,
Is it possible on juniper router to verify/monior the loss-priority of ingress
or egress realtime traffic ?
Thank you.
_
Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec une protec
gt;
>
> On 16/02/2010, at 10:14 PM, meryem Z wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello ,
> >
> > I have an M7i router with junos 9.6 R3 .
> >
> > Below it's hardware config :
> >
> > Hardware inventory:
> > Item Version
Hello ,
I have an M7i router with junos 9.6 R3 .
Below it's hardware config :
Hardware inventory:
Item Version Part number Serial number Description
ChassisA6156 M7i
Midplane REV 05 710-008761 CY8948M7i Midpla
38 matches
Mail list logo
