[j-nsp] SRX VPN HA implementation

2010-05-16 Thread Techtalm
Hi, Did anyone has encountered the need to implement an IPSec HA solution using SRX? I have 2 SRX machines, one in the main office along with 2 ISP connections and a branch office with only 1 ISP connection, I need to configure HA solution, using IPSec. Any ideas? Tal M _

Re: [j-nsp] JunOS

2010-05-16 Thread Techtalm
The SRX is quite new in the market and for my opinion it's a great product with high capabilities although he has some mature problems. I have installed and configured quite a lot of these and they are working fine as long u know what to except! -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...

[j-nsp] SRX in HA with OSPF failover time

2010-03-11 Thread Techtalm
Hi All, I have configured 2x SRX-3600 in high availability mode in front 2x 6500, the HA mode is active/passive. OSPF is running and I have configured graceful restart on the SRX in order to make the transition between the active and the passive more smoothly. But still when I take down the a

Re: [j-nsp] IP-SLA feature alike

2010-02-02 Thread Techtalm
Thanks! I will check it out. From: harbor235 [mailto:harbor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:26 PM To: Techtalm Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] IP-SLA feature alike Real-Time Perfromance monitor; http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos

[j-nsp] IP-SLA feature alike

2010-02-02 Thread Techtalm
Hello, Is there any similar feature like Cisco's IP-SLA in JUNOS? Maybe some other way to make redundant router/gateway connected to two ISP's... Best Regards, Tal M ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailm

Re: [j-nsp] tftp server

2010-01-30 Thread Techtalm
Hi Mohamed, You can use TFTP the same way as FTP, Start the shell and run TFTP, use the put and get commands to download/upload files. Best Regards, Tal M -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of mohamed attia

[j-nsp] EX script for MAC/IF/IP

2009-12-31 Thread techtalm
Hi, Anyone know a script (similar to Cisco tclsh) for showing MAC/IP/Interface table on a switch? BR, Talm ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Strange Latency on EX-4248t virtual chassis

2009-11-16 Thread techtalm
Who is the RE and who is the Backup RE? Although SW 1 is connected directly to SW2 and SW3 it goes to one of them through all the other switches, I think it is SW3 which SW1 goes all the round. mtc -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@pu

[j-nsp] Verifying NAT translation

2009-10-23 Thread techtalm
Hi, I have configured an SRX machine with source NAT and destination NAT as followed: set security nat source pool WAN_Address address x.x.x.x/32 set security nat source rule-set interface-nat from zone trust set security nat source rule-set interface-nat to zone untrust set security nat so

Re: [j-nsp] group interface

2009-10-15 Thread techtalm
Any chance for apply-group should accomplish this? Is quite wired that Junos can handle this kind of operation. _ From: Malte von dem Hagen [mailto:m...@hosteurope.de] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:26 PM To: techt...@gmail.com Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp]

Re: [j-nsp] group interface

2009-10-15 Thread techtalm
To configure group of interfaces with the same setting in one command, for example: to set the speed of the interface to 100 on 8 interfaces. -Original Message- From: Patrik Olsson [mailto:d...@webkom.se] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:06 PM To: techt...@gmail.com Cc: juniper-nsp@pu

[j-nsp] group interface

2009-10-15 Thread techtalm
Hi, Which Junos command is parallel to IOS "interface range"? BR, MTC ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] EX3200 Interop with Cisco 4948

2009-10-12 Thread techtalm
Hi, I have recently installed an EX-3200 for one of our customers and connected it to a Cisco Catalyst 4948 switch. Both are 10/100/1000Mbps switches and are inter-connected with copper wire, based on the defaults they supposed to sync on 1G But for some reason they are sync on 100Mbps half?