Well, i do have Atoms running here with 32bit and PAE and 8 GB of ram.
Even the rather slow N270 does support this. The Intel board D525MW
(which includes a soldered D525 Atom) officially (intel website)
supports only 4GB but will run fine with 8 GB.
Of course there might be older Atoms that do no
On 8/25/11 17:56 , Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) wrote:
> Thats not completely accurate, for example the Intel Atom D525 does run
> 64bit code.
there are a number of atoms the support 64bit, I think that the
observation I was making was that there are atoms that don't support
PAE, by virtue of not s
Thats not completely accurate, for example the Intel Atom D525 does run
64bit code.
> There are plenty of machines that do. virtually every intel system since
> the pentium pro (except the atom) has the hardware if not the bios
> support for doing so, that's not germain to the question of whethe
On 8/24/11 06:25 , Keegan Holley wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, Keegan Holley said:
>>> Interestingly enough my SE told us this is possible at lease on our Mx480
>>> and MX960 boxes. Our lab boxes are otherwise engaged at
Hi Keegan,
> They are saying that the new 16G RE's can handle 250M routes. How is this
> possible if none of the daemons are 64bit?
The only real practical scaling use case I am aware of in the range of
5M routes today is for vpnv4 route reflectors.
Another possible scaling point would be perha
On 8/24/11 11:18 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> 2011/8/25 Daniel Roesen
>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:52:54PM -0400, Keegan Holley wrote:
>>> They are saying that the new 16G RE's can handle 250M routes. How is
>> this
>>> possible if none of the daemons are 64bit?
>> Multiple logical-system instan
> >
> > -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
> > Von: Thomas Eichhorn
> > Datum: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:27:14 +0100
> > An: Keegan Holley
> > Cc:
> > Betreff: Re: [j-nsp] 32-Bit JunOS on the 64-Bit Routing Engines
> >
> > Yeah, that is clear - my origin
2011/8/25 Daniel Roesen
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:52:54PM -0400, Keegan Holley wrote:
> > They are saying that the new 16G RE's can handle 250M routes. How is
> this
> > possible if none of the daemons are 64bit?
>
> Multiple logical-system instances (== multiple rpd processes)? :-)
>
lol.
On 08/24/2011 10:28 AM, Johannes Resch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24.08.2011 09:12, Thomas Eichhorn wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just discussed the following with my SE:
>>
>> I wanted to get new 64Bit REs with some new gear,
>> but run the 32-Bit JunOS on them - he denied that
>> this is possible.
>>
>> I t
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:52:54PM -0400, Keegan Holley wrote:
> They are saying that the new 16G RE's can handle 250M routes. How is this
> possible if none of the daemons are 64bit?
Multiple logical-system instances (== multiple rpd processes)? :-)
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber
are saying that the new 16G RE's can handle 250M routes. How is this
possible if none of the daemons are 64bit?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
> > Von: Thomas Eichhorn
> > Datum: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:27:14 +0100
> &
ssues
that just affect one piece of sw and not the other.
hope that helps
/hannes
>
>
> -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
> Von: Thomas Eichhorn
> Datum: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:27:14 +0100
> An: Keegan Holley
> Cc:
> Betreff: Re: [j-nsp] 32-Bit JunOS on the 64-
Once upon a time, Keegan Holley said:
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Well, that isn't entirely true. Intel added the Physical Address
> > Extension to the Pentium Pro many years ago (and virtually everything
> > claiming to be i686 compatible has PAE). PAE allows the OS k
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Keegan Holley said:
>> Interestingly enough my SE told us this is possible at lease on our Mx480
>> and MX960 boxes. Our lab boxes are otherwise engaged at the moment so we
>> havent tested. One note reg
Once upon a time, Keegan Holley said:
> Interestingly enough my SE told us this is possible at lease on our Mx480 and
> MX960 boxes. Our lab boxes are otherwise engaged at the moment so we havent
> tested. One note regarding general computing though. The processor can only
> address 4G (3.8 or
Hi Thomas,
I agree with your reasoning - it is very practical :)
However I am not sure what you exactly call by "software". AFAIK the BSD
kernel has been 64 bit enabled and capable years ago so from that point
of view this is mature.
For a change various processes for example RPD last time I che
Yeah, that is clear - my original point is:
I do not trust the 64bit software - I have more faith in the 32bit software.
As per now, it has equal cost to order an MX960 with 32b-4G-RE or
64b-16G-RE.
So of course I would order the bigger RE but only if I can use the
the matured software...
To
Interestingly enough my SE told us this is possible at lease on our Mx480 and
MX960 boxes. Our lab boxes are otherwise engaged at the moment so we havent
tested. One note regarding general computing though. The processor can only
address 4G (3.8 or so actually) of ram with a 32 bit word size.
Hi,
On 24.08.2011 09:12, Thomas Eichhorn wrote:
Hi all,
I just discussed the following with my SE:
I wanted to get new 64Bit REs with some new gear,
but run the 32-Bit JunOS on them - he denied that
this is possible.
I tried to research that, but have not yet found
something in the docs - doe
Hi all,
I just discussed the following with my SE:
I wanted to get new 64Bit REs with some new gear,
but run the 32-Bit JunOS on them - he denied that
this is possible.
I tried to research that, but have not yet found
something in the docs - does anybody here have some clue
about that?
As the
20 matches
Mail list logo
