Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
March 2013 10:16 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 thanks. i don't think lacp is required for bundle links to work. i had done bundle links between cisco to cisco, juniper to juniper without lacp. i tried to avoid confusion of lacp between two switches before i know for sure two sides of

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Payam Chychi
Ive seen this happen with bad sfp as well as not setting mode to active Try setting up a simple ptp to remove portchan setting out of the equation, if that works and shows up/up on both ends, try setting to mode active on the portchan settings If ur ptp doesn't work... Try diff port, negotiati

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Bill Blackford
bsd [mailto:snort...@yahoo.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:12 AM > To: Eric Krichbaum; 'Jonathan Lassoff' > Cc: 'juniper-nsp' > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 > > > > well, i deliberately not to activate lacp at this moment. just want to see

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Eric Krichbaum
snort bsd [mailto:snort...@yahoo.com.au] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:12 AM To: Eric Krichbaum; 'Jonathan Lassoff' Cc: 'juniper-nsp' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 well, i deliberately not to activate lacp at this moment. just want to see physical links up... _

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Eric Krichbaum
That's correct but in this case one is LACP (802.3ad) and one is not so it won't bring up the links at all. Eric From: snort bsd [mailto:snort...@yahoo.com.au] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:17 AM To: Jonathan Lassoff; Eric Krichbaum Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 375

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
_dave From: Jonathan Lassoff To: Eric Krichbaum Cc: snort bsd ; juniper-nsp Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013 10:15 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: > More likely, it's the forced "on" mode which disa

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
well, i deliberately not to activate lacp at this moment. just want to see physical links up... _dave From: Eric Krichbaum To: 'Jonathan Lassoff' ; 'snort bsd' Cc: 'juniper-nsp' Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013 9:36 PM Subj

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread snort bsd
well, both ends are copper links, but links on 3750 are f10/100 and that of juniper are 10/100/1000. _dave From: Jonathan Lassoff To: snort bsd Cc: juniper-nsp Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 It's strange

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Mark Menzies
We had issues before with LAGs between cisco and SRX. The links were showing as up and then intermittently went down. We fixed it by setting the LACP periodic interval to slow and it corrected it all. Seems that cisco defaults to slow and Juniper to fast. Just a mismatch in LACP packets. HTH

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Bjørn Tore
Might it be that the EX can't link to FE, but only to GE? I know the -F only takes gig, unless you use a certain SFP. Bjørn Tore @ mobil Den 13. mars 2013 kl. 23:40 skrev snort bsd : > hi all: > > i have a cisco 3750 fastethernet switch connecting to a juniper 4200, with > portchannel on cisc

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-14 Thread Bjørn Tore
Is this an Bjørn Tore @ mobil Den 13. mars 2013 kl. 23:40 skrev snort bsd : > hi all: > > i have a cisco 3750 fastethernet switch connecting to a juniper 4200, with > portchannel on cisco side and aggregated interface juniper side. the cisco > side shows as "connected" but juniper side remai

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-13 Thread Eric Krichbaum
-Original Message- From: Jonathan Lassoff [mailto:j...@thejof.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:16 PM To: Eric Krichbaum Cc: snort bsd; juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: > More likely, it's the forced &

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-13 Thread Eric Krichbaum
bsd Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 It's strange that one end shows the interface as up, but the other does not. Is it possible that you're using SFPs that only do 1000base-T? What if you take the individual ports out of the ae / etherchannel and just go point-to-point,

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-13 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Eric Krichbaum wrote: > More likely, it's the forced "on" mode which disables LACP. Try it with > mode active. Will JunOS show the ae as down, then? [channel-group N mode on] with IOS just enables portchanneling unconditionally. Wouldn't that, in conjunction wit

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-13 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
It's strange that one end shows the interface as up, but the other does not. Is it possible that you're using SFPs that only do 1000base-T? What if you take the individual ports out of the ae / etherchannel and just go point-to-point, does the link show as up then? Maybe try cabling up to the ma

[j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

2013-03-13 Thread snort bsd
hi all: i have a cisco 3750 fastethernet switch connecting to a juniper 4200, with portchannel on cisco side and aggregated interface juniper side. the cisco side shows as "connected" but juniper side remain down. could anyone give me some ideas? no lacp activated on both side. for cisco: cis