Re: [j-nsp] 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs SR optics

2016-09-27 Thread joel jaeggli
On 9/27/16 8:12 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: >> Fredrik Korsbäck >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:58 PM >> >> On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> What is the current stand in this matter? >>> Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative? >>> As it looks l

Re: [j-nsp] 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs SR optics

2016-09-27 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> Fredrik Korsbäck > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:58 PM > > On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > What is the current stand in this matter? > > Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative? > > As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dea

Re: [j-nsp] 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs SR optics

2016-09-27 Thread Fredrik Korsbäck
On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Hi folks, > > What is the current stand in this matter? > Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative? > As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dead/legacy? > -cause it doesn’t seem to be such a problem to find 3rd party 10

[j-nsp] 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs SR optics

2016-09-27 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Hi folks, What is the current stand in this matter? Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative? As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dead/legacy? -cause it doesn’t seem to be such a problem to find 3rd party 100G QSFP-SR4 –though not sure about the compatibility