On 9/27/16 8:12 AM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
>> Fredrik Korsbäck
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:58 PM
>>
>> On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> What is the current stand in this matter?
>>> Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative?
>>> As it looks l
> Fredrik Korsbäck
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:58 PM
>
> On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > What is the current stand in this matter?
> > Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative?
> > As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dea
On 27/09/16 16:47, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> What is the current stand in this matter?
> Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative?
> As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dead/legacy?
> -cause it doesn’t seem to be such a problem to find 3rd party 10
Hi folks,
What is the current stand in this matter?
Are 3rd party juniper compatible CFPs a viable alternative?
As it looks like no one is making CFP-SR10s, -are these dead/legacy?
-cause it doesn’t seem to be such a problem to find 3rd party 100G QSFP-SR4
–though not sure about the compatibility
4 matches
Mail list logo