Thanks a lot Mark and Richard
very clarifying !
BR
Alexi
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:18:01AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > Not quite - what I did say was:
> >
> > "We're aggregating 3x Gig-E links between both devices, and
>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:18:01AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Not quite - what I did say was:
>
> "We're aggregating 3x Gig-E links between both devices, and
>it's working fairly well. Traffic distribution from the
>M7i to the 6500 is 1:1:1, while traffic
>d
On Thursday 14 January 2010 12:45:01 pm alexi wrote:
> Hello Mark:
Hi Alex.
Sorry for the late response, been rather backed up here :-).
> in the example you mention you said that your bundle is
> using 3xGE and you have a pretty fair load balance
1:1:1...
Not quite - what I did say was:
2:04 AM, Stefan Fouant <
> > sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> > > > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of alexi
> > > >
t; > -Original Message-
> > > > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> > > > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of alexi
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:45 PM
> > > > To: mti...@globaltransit.net
> > > &g
January 13, 2010 11:45 PM
> > > To: mti...@globaltransit.net
> > > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question
> > >
> > > Hello Mark:
> > >
> > > I am coming back to this question , i would apreciate you
> > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question
> >
> > Hello Mark:
> >
> > I am coming back to this question , i would apreciate your help again
> > ...
> >
> > in the example you mention you said that your bundle is us
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of alexi
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:45 PM
> To: mti...@globaltransit.net
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-
Hello Mark:
I am coming back to this question , i would apreciate your help again ...
in the example you mention you said that your bundle is using 3xGE and you
have a pretty fair load balance 1:1:1
do you know if there is any requirement about having pair numbers or power
of 2 amount of links in
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 12:25:20 am alexi wrote:
> Great , thanks Mark ...
>
> what JUNOS are you using ? , I´ve heard that it has some
> issues with load balancing in 8.0
We're running the evil 9.3R2.8 on this box, but will be
moving it to 9.5R4 in January 2010.
Cheers,
Mark.
signature.
Great , thanks Mark ...
what JUNOS are you using ? , I´ve heard that it has some issues with load
balancing in 8.0
Thanks again
Alexi
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday 30 October 2009 01:19:27 am alexi wrote:
>
> > I´ve been reading that the load balancing in the bu
On Friday 30 October 2009 01:19:27 am alexi wrote:
> I´ve been reading that the load balancing in the bundle
> (balancing between physical interfaces in the same
> bundle) may be achieved using different criterias like
> source or destination IP ... but it seems is a global
> configurarion and do
On Friday 30 October 2009 01:19:27 am alexi wrote:
> I´ve been reading that the load balancing in the bundle
> (balancing between physical interfaces in the same
> bundle) may be achieved using different criterias like
> source or destination IP ... but it seems is a global
> configurarion and do
ate it..
>
> Paul
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mti...@globaltransit.net]
> Sent: October 25, 2009 1:02 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Cc: Paul Stewart
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question
>
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:23:
Paul Stewart
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad Question
On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:23:51 pm Paul Stewart wrote:
> Just a quick question regarding 802.3ad...
Not to be pedantic, but turns out it's now 802.1AX :-).
> Is there a limit on number of members in the LAG bundle?
I notice your re
On Sunday 25 October 2009 10:23:51 pm Paul Stewart wrote:
> Just a quick question regarding 802.3ad...
Not to be pedantic, but turns out it's now 802.1AX :-).
> Is there a limit on number of members in the LAG bundle?
I notice your reference was to a Juniper ERX platform. I
can't tell you much
Hi folks..
Just a quick question regarding 802.3ad
working on some potential ideas
for an upcoming project.So Ive been reading through
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose90/swconfig-physical/html
/ethernet-config14.html
Is there a limit on number of members in the LA
17 matches
Mail list logo
