Re: [j-nsp] Any takers on 10.4R5.5 yet ?

2011-06-29 Thread David Ball
Minor update on the 10.4R5.5 codethings were looking OK until I tried some failure scenarios. Haven't nailed it down yet, but it looks as though LDP when running in a logical-system (not sure if logical-system is part of the problem) reconverges rather slowly, even if/when LFA is in use. It

Re: [j-nsp] Any takers on 10.4R5.5 yet ?

2011-06-27 Thread Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
We're running R5.5 for a couple of our MX480s undergoing testing as BRAS. Ran the code to resolve an issue where PPPoE states are stucked at Terminating only to run to an issue where PPPoE state unable to move beyond Init in this release. Go figure. Last we heard from our SEs, the 10.4 release

Re: [j-nsp] Any takers on 10.4R5.5 yet ?

2011-06-27 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:05:48AM -0600, David Ball wrote: > I know it's unreasonable to have people continually posting to the > list asking about which code is best, but I know many were waiting for > a stable 10.4 revision (due in part to its' EEOL nature) but last I > heard, 10.4R2 (or was i

Re: [j-nsp] Any takers on 10.4R5.5 yet ?

2011-06-27 Thread Joel Jaeggli
we're running it on trio only mx960s in production. it's got a few issues at least one our outstanding one's (frame-relay encapsulation lti interfaces not working) is fixed in 11 but I don't think we're willing to make that jump yet outside the lab. On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:05 AM, David Ball wrot

[j-nsp] Any takers on 10.4R5.5 yet ?

2011-06-27 Thread David Ball
I'm about to stand this up on some MX80s in the lab but wondered if any bleeding-edgers out there have already ruled it out on the platform, and if so, why. Certainly mileage will vary depending on what you're doing with it, but I'm asking in general (we're dual-stacked QoS-enabled MPLS with all