Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2013-03-31 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday, January 01, 2013 02:58:54 PM Phil Bedard wrote: > I agree it is not quite the same. The hierarchical FIB > and next-hop indirection so the number of prefixes is > independent of the reconvergence time has been in Junos > for a long time. That is like the PIC part. http://www.juniper.n

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2013-01-01 Thread Jesper Skriver
Disclaimer, I work for cisco and was involved in the idea, design and implementation of BGP PIC Edge, though here I speak only for myself and not my employer. >From the "Example: Configuring MPLS Egress Protection for Layer 3 VPN Services" of http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/inform

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2013-01-01 Thread Phil Bedard
r.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms Disclaimer, I work for cisco and was involved in the idea, design and implementation of BGP PIC Edge, though here I speak only for myself and not my employer. >From the "Example: Configuring MPLS Egress Protection for Layer 3 VPN Servi

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Bedard
11.4R3 I believe. Juniper calls it MPLS Egress Protection for L3VPN Phil On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg. > JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x) > > Rob > ___ > juniper-ns

Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2012-12-31 Thread OBrien, Will
uh, what? On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg. > JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x) > > Rob > ___ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.

[j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms

2012-12-31 Thread Robert Hass
Hi Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg. JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x) Rob ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp