On Tuesday, January 01, 2013 02:58:54 PM Phil Bedard wrote:
> I agree it is not quite the same. The hierarchical FIB
> and next-hop indirection so the number of prefixes is
> independent of the reconvergence time has been in Junos
> for a long time. That is like the PIC part.
http://www.juniper.n
Disclaimer, I work for cisco and was involved in the idea, design and
implementation of BGP PIC Edge, though here I speak only for myself
and not my employer.
>From the "Example: Configuring MPLS Egress Protection for Layer 3
VPN Services" of
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.2/inform
r.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP PIC Edge on MX platforms
Disclaimer, I work for cisco and was involved in the idea, design and
implementation of BGP PIC Edge, though here I speak only for myself
and not my employer.
>From the "Example: Configuring MPLS Egress Protection for Layer 3
VPN Servi
11.4R3 I believe. Juniper calls it MPLS Egress Protection for L3VPN
Phil
On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Robert Hass wrote:
> Hi
> Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg.
> JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x)
>
> Rob
> ___
> juniper-ns
uh, what?
On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Robert Hass
wrote:
> Hi
> Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg.
> JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x)
>
> Rob
> ___
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.
Hi
Is BGP PIC Edge functionality supported on current MX platforms ? (eg.
JunOS 11.4R6 or 12.x)
Rob
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
6 matches
Mail list logo