Re: [j-nsp] Basic doubt on unit

2010-01-25 Thread Brandon Bennett
What are you doubting? That you have to do it? That it's absolutely necessary? That Cisco is better in it's implementation that allows ip addresses in the main interfaces config? The idea is not to think about it as a "subinterface" but to think of it of where the layer 3 configuration is at.

Re: [j-nsp] Basic doubt on unit

2010-01-25 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:03:58 +0530 > From: Taqdir Singh > Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > > Hi All, > > I am new to juniper.l could you please share why junos is made such like > we must define unit (subinterface) for any configuration like ip etc ? Because Juniper is a mod

[j-nsp] Basic doubt on unit

2010-01-25 Thread Taqdir Singh
Hi All, I am new to juniper.l could you please share why junos is made such like we must define unit (subinterface) for any configuration like ip etc ? -- Taqdir Singh Network Engineering (+91) 991-170-9496 | (+91) 801-041-5988 One who asks is a fool for a moment, one who doesn't ask remains