Richard,
I've filed PR 389794 to track this issue.
--Stacy
aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 25, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Ok, I just found a Juniper bug that is so strange I can't even bring
myself to open a case for it. Not only because I can just imagine
trying
to explai
Dave Diller wrote:
6 Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-42.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.234) 13.428 ms
Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-46.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.238) 15.618 ms
Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-42.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.234) 15.574 ms
Only thing in common here is the 62 first octet, though you can now see
t
6 Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-42.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.234) 13.428 ms
Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-46.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.238) 15.618 ms
Wimax-Cali-190-0-0-42.orbitel.net.co (62.154.16.234) 15.574 ms
Only thing in common here is the 62 first octet, though you can now
see
that its zeroing o
Thats a weird one alright.
Only one way to really figure out what happened.
Let there be diff... :-)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 07:09:08PM -0400, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> Yep that one pretty much takes the cake!
>
>
>
> On 9/25/08, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I just fou
Yep that one pretty much takes the cake!
On 9/25/08, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I just found a Juniper bug that is so strange I can't even bring
> myself to open a case for it. Not only because I can just imagine trying
> to explain it to JTAC, but because it is so fr
Ok, I just found a Juniper bug that is so strange I can't even bring
myself to open a case for it. Not only because I can just imagine trying
to explain it to JTAC, but because it is so freaking bizaare and funny
that I just have to share it with others. :)
It seems that in 9.1+ code there is a
6 matches
Mail list logo