On 11/May/15 12:07, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
>
> Speaking about EX4550
>
> I think they are OK for basic routing.
> In my use case (l3vpn, and customers demarcation) results are mixed.
> They worked, they are stable but :
>
> Remaining problems are :
> - l2vpn mess (I ve found a working confi
Le 11/05/15 11:49, Mark Tinka a écrit :
Juniper have never really had a proper router that comes in a switch
form-factor. We are evaluating the ACX5000 platform for this, and it
looks very promising; but its use of off-the-shelf silicon is getting in
the way. The EX (certainly the 1U switches
On 11/May/15 11:38, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
>
> That was the plan yes. If I had correclty evaluate/made more test, I
> have done this differently, and just use EX for what they are made
> (switching).
I know this does not help you now, but in general, switches are very bad
at being routers.
* Raphael Mazelier
> Have you notive/hit some performance problems with this config ?
No.
Tore
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Le 11/05/15 11:31, Mark Tinka a écrit :
On 11/May/15 11:11, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
We have seen this on our EX4550 switches.
The uplink toward the upstream routers is an 802.1Q LAG, where the aeX
interface graphs actual traffic, but the aeX.Y interface just graphs
control traffic.
Yes
Le 11/05/15 11:27, Tore Anderson a écrit :
It's quite annoying indeed.
I wonder if someone ever faced this problem, and if there is some king
of workarround. The goal is to monitoring traffic, and billing.
The way I do it is to create input and output firewall filters for each
configured fa
On 11/May/15 11:11, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
> I've just realized there is another pretting annoying problem with EX
> series. It seems that is was not possible to count passing in
> subinterface (or vlan interface) on EX.
>
> Quoting the documentation :
>
> "Note: For logical interfaces on EX S
* Raphael Mazelier
> I've just realized there is another pretting annoying problem with EX
> series. It seems that is was not possible to count passing in
> subinterface (or vlan interface) on EX.
It's quite annoying indeed.
> I wonder if someone ever faced this problem, and if there is some
I've just realized there is another pretting annoying problem with EX
series. It seems that is was not possible to count passing in
subinterface (or vlan interface) on EX.
Quoting the documentation :
"Note: For logical interfaces on EX Series switches, the traffic
statistics fields in show
9 matches
Mail list logo
