Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Truman Boyes
It is a fair question, and the blanket policy of not supporting any third party components makes sense for the company; this policy rarely presents an issue in the real world as long as the support issue is not related to the third party component. However, lets just take one example to sho

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:19:38PM +0100, Dermot Williams wrote: > My question is a more general one about whether or not Juniper reserve > the right to refuse to support a chassis that has had non-Juniper > components installed, whether that's DRAM, SFPs or compact-flash cards. > Obviously if a pr

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Dermot Williams
ts present - even if the actual problem isn't necessarily related to the component in question. Dermot -Original Message- From: Boyd, Benjamin R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2008 15:06 To: Dermot Williams Subject: RE: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7 They don't cover a

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Boyd, Benjamin R
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol >Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:37 AM >To: 'Jonathan Looney'; Matthias Gelbhardt >Cc: juniper-nsp >Subject: Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7 > >

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Looney > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:26 AM > To: Matthias Gelbhardt > Cc: juniper-nsp > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7 > > ... &g

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Jonathan Looney
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Matthias Gelbhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I think this clearly states, that the 256 MB of memory are not enough. So > we are now trying to upgrade it. I am surprised, that 60 routes are > obviously too much for this router. Will 786 MB do the trick also fo

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread sthaug
> The reason I wrote is, that we have a M7 with 256 MB DRAM. Yesterday I > configured three iBGP sessions and one eBGP session. In total I got > around 60 routes from which 26 were active. The receiving and > advertising process was finished also the best path determination. > After

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7 / crash of M7

2008-08-26 Thread Matthias Gelbhardt
Hi! The reason I wrote is, that we have a M7 with 256 MB DRAM. Yesterday I configured three iBGP sessions and one eBGP session. In total I got around 60 routes from which 26 were active. The receiving and advertising process was finished also the best path determination. After a f

Re: [j-nsp] DRAM for M7

2008-08-25 Thread John T. Yocum
Hi Matthias, JuniperClue has a list of modules that people have used, http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Route_Engine_DRAM_Compatibility#RE-5.0_Generic_DRAM --John Matthias Gelbhardt wrote: Hello! What kind of RAM modules can I use for the M7? Do I have to use Juniper RAM or can I use al

[j-nsp] DRAM for M7

2008-08-25 Thread Matthias Gelbhardt
Hello! What kind of RAM modules can I use for the M7? Do I have to use Juniper RAM or can I use alternate modules? Regards, Matthias ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp