Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

2012-02-29 Thread Timh Bergström
We are running 10.4r7.5 with security on dual stack with static routing, dhcp (IPv4) and RA (IPv6) for the office, it Works ok, but had to upgrade the ram and cf. We are running j2320. We also have one j2320 running on 10.4R8-something for our IX peerings, both v4/v6. I've disabled all security

Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

2012-02-28 Thread 叶雨飞
I just tried 11.1 half year ago for a couple of times and it crashes badly either on boot or after a while, that basically gives my take on using bleeding edge version. I don't have access to the new release anyway. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:51 PM, James Jones wrote: > Do all versions of 11.x cra

Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

2012-02-28 Thread Chris Kawchuk
- 10.2R4.8 on J2320's 512M RAM; but in packet-mode (as I'm using it for an MPLS/CPE endpoint), which is the last version you can use without upgrading the CF/RAM. - 10.4R8.5 on J2320's 1Gb RAM, packet mode (same as above as MPLS CPE/endpoint) - I've had good luck with 10.4R8.5 so far though;

Re: [j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

2012-02-28 Thread 叶雨飞
any one? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Yucong Sun (叶雨飞) wrote: > Hi, > > I have two j2350, one with 9.3r4.4, and the other I am trying to find > a good version to upgrade to, with security features. So far I have > tried: > > 1) 10.1 - 10.2R4, those runs okay, but they only have half-ass ipv6

[j-nsp] Decent J-Series software version

2012-02-24 Thread 叶雨飞
Hi, I have two j2350, one with 9.3r4.4, and the other I am trying to find a good version to upgrade to, with security features. So far I have tried: 1) 10.1 - 10.2R4, those runs okay, but they only have half-ass ipv6 support. 2) 10.4R8, crash once a month or so, msut be manually rebooted, plus th