Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling

we've got around 20 racks of vc stuff nowadays. some in 4 switch, most in 2 switch, a mix of ex4200 and now ex4300, ranging from 11.4R2.14 to newer 13.2X51-D25.2. the trick for me has always been to get one working and configured as you like (including slice alternate), set auto-sw-update with the

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling

I have 4 VC stacks of 2x EX4200 in X ring, with no issues. I am running 11.4R1, 11.4R2, 11.4R5, (they have deployed overtime, and have not had a reason to schedule downtime yet). Some are auto-config, others are pre-provisioned. -Mike Gonnason On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Skeeve Stevens < s

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling

Awesome.. thanks. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitt

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling

I've never had any issues doing it either way. It'll auto-detect the topology, even if you have only a single link. What I have seen though is a bunch of units (at least a couple of months back) coming out of the factory booting form the backup image (like the build image was corrupt), so it m

[j-nsp] EX4200 VC Cabling

Hi all, We're doing a bunch of 2 x EX4200 in VC. Once we connect the VC cables, one of the Junos seems to be corrupted. We're currently using the ring X cabling.. but I have seen another option for a 2 member stack of | | Anyone got any thoughts? ***