On 1/18/13 4:19 AM, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:55:36PM +0100, Dennis Krul | Tilaa wrote:
> So that means thousands of MAC, ARP and v6 neighbour entries in the PFE
database (but nowhere near the supported limit of 16k entries).
16k doesn't seem realistic as s
Hi,
...on Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:55:36PM +0100, Dennis Krul | Tilaa wrote:
> So that means thousands of MAC, ARP and v6 neighbour entries in the PFE
> database (but nowhere near the supported limit of 16k entries).
16k doesn't seem realistic as soon as v6 is involved.
As far as I have heard
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:38 PM, David Siebörger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've experienced something at least slightly similar. We have VC pairs of
> EX4200s as campus distribution, acting as the default gateways for end-user
> subnets ranging from /27s to (in one case) a /21, also with OSPF + OSPFv3
> and
Hi,
I've experienced something at least slightly similar. We have VC pairs of
EX4200s as campus distribution, acting as the default gateways for end-user
subnets ranging from /27s to (in one case) a /21, also with OSPF + OSPFv3
and LAGs down to access switches.
The symptoms I've seen most often
On Jan 15, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Dennis Krul | Tilaa wrote:
>>> Can you tell the PR number you tried to avoid initially ?
>>
>> I wasn't trying to avoid it. I just thought it wouldn't be interesting,
>> because it's an internal PR. But here it i
On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Dennis Krul | Tilaa wrote:
>> Can you tell the PR number you tried to avoid initially ?
>
> I wasn't trying to avoid it. I just thought it wouldn't be interesting,
> because it's an internal PR. But here it is: PR843475
I suspect you may have answered a different qu
On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:49 AM, Tima Maryin wrote:
> On 14.01.2013 23:55, Dennis Krul | Tilaa wrote:
>
> skip
>
>
>> JTAC analysed our core dumps and told us this was a known issue (null
>> pointer exception). It would not be resolved in 10.4 but was resolved in
>> 11.2R5.5, the recommended JTA
On 14.01.2013 23:55, Dennis Krul | Tilaa wrote:
skip
JTAC analysed our core dumps and told us this was a known issue (null pointer
exception). It would not be resolved in 10.4 but was resolved in 11.2R5.5, the
recommended JTAC release for EX4200.
Last time i checked, recommended release w
Hello list,
We are experiencing PFE crashes (core dumps) on one of our EX4200 VC's.
It appears we've hit an unknown bug and we have been working with JTAC and
Juniper engineering to find the root cause of the issue, but so far without any
luck. (There is no public PR for this issue yet.)
I wa
9 matches
Mail list logo
